Literature DB >> 23770769

Does workplace health promotion in Denmark reach relevant target groups?

Marie Birk Jørgensen1, Ebbe Villadsen2, Hermann Burr3, Ole Steen Mortensen4, Andreas Holtermann2.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate whether Workplace Health Promotion (WHP) is available for workers with poor health status (overweight, musculoskeletal disorders, sickness absence and poor self-rated health) or health behaviour (smoking, poor diet and sedentarism) and whether they participate in WHP. In total, 9835 workers responded to questions regarding availability to 6 different types of WHP through The Danish Work Environment Cohort Study in 2010. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, gender and industry were performed to calculate odds ratios for availability and participation of WHP among groups with different health behaviours and health status. In general, poor health behaviours were associated with reduced availability of and participation in WHP. In contrast, poor health status was generally associated with higher availability of WHP and increased participation. However, poor self-rated health was associated with lower availability of several types of WHP and reduced participation. In general, workers with health challenges that are visible to others had WHP available, whereas workers with less visible health challenges had WHP less frequently available. Health challenges visible to others were associated with higher participation in WHP, whereas poor health behaviour and reduced self-rated health were associated with reduced participation in WHP programmes.
© The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  non-communicable diseases; participation; worksite

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770769     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dat041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  8 in total

1.  Patterns and predictors of workplace health promotion: cross-sectional findings from a company survey in Germany.

Authors:  David Beck; Uwe Lenhardt; Britta Schmitt; Sabine Sommer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Barriers and facilitators for participation in health promotion programs among employees: a six-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Anne Rongen; Suzan J W Robroek; Wouter van Ginkel; Dennis Lindeboom; Bibiëlle Altink; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  How needs and preferences of employees influence participation in health promotion programs: a six-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Anne Rongen; Suzan J W Robroek; Wouter van Ginkel; Dennis Lindeboom; Martin Pet; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Does employee participation in workplace health promotion depend on the working environment? A cross-sectional study of Danish workers.

Authors:  Marie Birk Jørgensen; Ebbe Villadsen; Hermann Burr; Laura Punnett; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Worksite health promotion and social inequalities in health.

Authors:  Anne C van der Put; Jornt J Mandemakers; John B F de Wit; Tanja van der Lippe
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2020-01-17

6.  Can childcare work be designed to promote moderate and vigorous physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and health? Study protocol for the Goldilocks-childcare randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark Lidegaard; Anders Fritz Lerche; Pernille Kold Munch; Kathrine Greby Schmidt; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Leon Straker; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Can Childcare Work Be Designed to Promote High Intensity Physical Activity for Improved Fitness and Health? A Proof of Concept Study of the Goldilocks Principle.

Authors:  Anders Fritz Lerche; Maja Vilhelmsen; Kathrine Greby Schmidt; Rasmus Kildedal; Natja Launbo; Pernille Kold Munch; Mark Lidegaard; Sandra Schade Jacobsen; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Leon Straker; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  How much do we know about the effectiveness of warm-up intervention on work related musculoskeletal disorders, physical and psychosocial functions: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas Larinier; Romain Balaguier; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.