Kinesin-based transport is important for synaptogenesis, neuroplasticity, and maintaining synaptic function. In an anatomical screen of neurodevelopmental mutants, we identified the exchange of a conserved residue (R561H) in the forkhead-associated domain of the kinesin-3 family member Unc-104/KIF1A as the genetic cause for defects in synaptic terminal- and dendrite morphogenesis. Previous structure-based analysis suggested that the corresponding residue in KIF1A might be involved in stabilizing the activated state of kinesin-3 dimers. Herein we provide the first in vivo evidence for the functional importance of R561. The R561H allele (unc-104(bris)) is not embryonic lethal, which allowed us to investigate consequences of disturbed Unc-104 function on postembryonic synapse development and larval behavior. We demonstrate that Unc-104 regulates the reliable apposition of active zones and postsynaptic densities, possibly by controlling site-specific delivery of its cargo. Next, we identified a role for Unc-104 in restraining neuromuscular junction growth and coordinating dendrite branch morphogenesis, suggesting that Unc-104 is also involved in dendritic transport. Mutations in KIF1A/unc-104 have been associated with hereditary spastic paraplegia and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 2. However, we did not observe synapse retraction or dystonic posterior paralysis. Overall, our study demonstrates the specificity of defects caused by selective impairments of distinct molecular motors and highlights the critical importance of Unc-104 for the maturation of neuronal structures during embryonic development, larval synaptic terminal outgrowth, and dendrite morphogenesis.
Kinesin-based transport is important for synaptogenesis, neuroplasticity, and maintaining synaptic function. In an anatomical screen of neurodevelopmental mutants, we identified the exchange of a conserved residue (R561H) in the forkhead-associated domain of the kinesin-3 family member Unc-104/KIF1A as the genetic cause for defects in synaptic terminal- and dendrite morphogenesis. Previous structure-based analysis suggested that the corresponding residue in KIF1A might be involved in stabilizing the activated state of kinesin-3 dimers. Herein we provide the first in vivo evidence for the functional importance of R561. The R561H allele (unc-104(bris)) is not embryonic lethal, which allowed us to investigate consequences of disturbed Unc-104 function on postembryonic synapse development and larval behavior. We demonstrate that Unc-104 regulates the reliable apposition of active zones and postsynaptic densities, possibly by controlling site-specific delivery of its cargo. Next, we identified a role for Unc-104 in restraining neuromuscular junction growth and coordinating dendrite branch morphogenesis, suggesting that Unc-104 is also involved in dendritic transport. Mutations in KIF1A/unc-104 have been associated with hereditary spastic paraplegia and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 2. However, we did not observe synapse retraction or dystonic posterior paralysis. Overall, our study demonstrates the specificity of defects caused by selective impairments of distinct molecular motors and highlights the critical importance of Unc-104 for the maturation of neuronal structures during embryonic development, larval synaptic terminal outgrowth, and dendrite morphogenesis.
SYNAPSE formation and maturation depend on kinesin-based fast anterograde transport (Hirokawa ; Kondo ; van den Berg and Hoogenraad 2012). Key synaptic components such as synaptic vesicle precursors (Hall and Hedgecock 1991), mitochondria (Nangaku ), piccolo-bassoon transport vesicles (Cai ), and RNA–protein complexes (Ohashi ) are transported by members of the kinesin-1 or kinesin-3 families (for review see Hirokawa and Noda 2008). To date, only a limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying cargo specificity and the dynamic regulation of cargo–motor complexes has emerged. In particular, factors that mediate motor activation and cargo binding and release remain to be elucidated (for review see Verhey and Hammond 2009; Verhey ).In an anatomical screen examining mutants that might be involved in synaptogenesis, we identified a weak hypomorphic mutation (R561H) in the kinesin-3 family member Unc-104. KIF1A/unc-104 has been implicated in hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) (Erlich ; Klebe ) and hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 2 (Riviere ). The R561H allele (unc-104) is not embryonic lethal allowing for detailed larval behavioral analysis. No synapse retraction or dystonic posterior paralysis, as described for the HSP type 10Drosophila model, in which kinesin-1-based axonal transport is disturbed (Fuger ), were observed. Rather, the observed defects were mostly neurodevelopmental.The affected arginine residue (R561) localizes to the β11-loop of the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of Unc-104. Structure-based analysis suggests that interaction of the corresponding residue (R583) in humanKIF1A with the E499 residue located in the β1/β2-loop might stabilize kinesin-3 dimers (Huo ). The functional relevance of the interaction has not yet been elucidated. Here, we employed larvae as a model to investigate the functional importance of Unc-104 during larval development and to characterize the effects of disrupting the proposed electrostatic interaction between the β11- and the β1/β2-loop in vivo.We show that R561 is important for kinesin-3 function and provide evidence that Unc-104 critically restricts neuromuscular junction (NMJ) growth during larval development. Moreover, Unc-104 is essential for the reliable apposition of active zones (AZs) and postsynaptic densities (PSDs) and controls dendrite branch morphogenesis. In addition to previously described roles (Pack-Chung ; Barkus ), these novel functions demonstrate that Unc-104 orchestrates synapse formation and maturation at the NMJ during embryonic and larval development and also regulates dendrite morphogenesis.
Materials and Methods
Fly stocks
Flies were raised on standard medium at 25° unless otherwise noted. The following fly strains were used in this study: (Thibault ), Df(2R)Exel 7145 (O’Farrell ), Df(2R)Exel 6064 (Parks ), Df(2R)ED 3181, elav, D42-Gal4, and UAS-actin. UAS-unc-104 was obtained from Thomas Schwarz (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA). Transgenic RNAi stocks were obtained from the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (Dietzl ). UAS-Brp and UAS-Brp-RNAi stocks were obtained from Stephan Sigrist (Freie Universität Berlin, Germany).Fly strains were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center unless otherwise noted.
Immunohistochemistry
For preparation of larval fillets, third instar larvae were dissected essentially as previously described (Qin ). In brief, larvae were gently stretched and immobilized on a dissection plate with the dorsal midline of the larvae facing upward. Insect pins were positioned at the anterior and posterior end of the larvae. After applying a drop of ice-cold hemolymph-like saline solution, the larvae were cut open along the dorsal midline. The epidermis was stretched and fixed using insect pins. Internal organs were removed using forceps. Care was taken to avoid damaging the body wall muscles and the central nervous system. Next, larvae were fixed (4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline, PBS), blocked (PBS, 5% normal goat serum, 0.05% Triton X-100), and stained with primary (4°, overnight) and secondary (2 h at room temperature) antibodies essentially as previously described (Qin ).The peptide (PRRSLDKSLDRTPKS) was used to generate and affinity purify the rabbit anti-GluRIII antibody. The purified antibody was used at a 1:1000 dilution. The following primary antibodies, obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, were used at the concentrations indicated: Bruchpilot (nc82) 1:100 and Dlg (4F3) 1:50. VGlut (1:1000) was obtained from Hermann Aberle (Mahr and Aberle 2006), and Unc-104/Imac (1:1000) from Thomas Schwarz (Pack-Chung ). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-Cy3 (1:500) and HRP-Cy5 (1:500) were obtained from Dianova. The fluorescence-labeled secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen, Molecular Probes, or from Fluka/Sigma.
Embryo collection and fixation
Embryos were collected on apple juice plates at 25°. At 16.5 h after egg laying (AEL), embryos were prepared for confocal microscopy as previously described (Mahr and Aberle 2006).
Analysis of sensory neurons
To analyze the dendritic branches in body-wall sensory neurons, larvae were killed by immersing them for 2–4 s in 65° water. Next, larvae were mounted in a chamber originally designed for in vivo imaging and imaged within 15 min on a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope. Details on the construction of the chamber and larvae mounting have been previously described (Fuger ; Zhang ).
Imaging and analysis
Whole larvae or larval fillets were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope, equipped with 405, 440, 488, 514, 561, and 633 laser lines and a ConfoCor 3 scanhead using a 40× Plan-Apochromat 1.3 N.A. or a 63× Plan-Apochromat 1.4 N.A. objective. Unless otherwise specified, the images were obtained using photomultiplier tube (PMT) detection. If fluorescence intensity was low, the sample was imaged using avalanche photodiode (APD) detection. Unless otherwise specified, the voxel dimensions (x/y/z) for NMJs were 100 × 100 × 500 nm and for ventral nerve cords, 300 × 300 × 1000 nm.Embryonic or larval sensory neurons were recorded with the following voxel sizes: embryonic sensory neurons shown in Figure 3, A, A′, B, and B′: 346 × 346 × 750 nm; embryonic sensory neurons shown in Figure 3, A′′, A′′′, B′′, B′′′: 100 × 100 × 500 nm; and larval sensory neurons: 520 × 520 × 750 nm. Images were scaled by a factor of 2, and Gaussian blur filtering was applied (pixel radius = 2). Gamma values were adjusted for illustrational purposes to 0.75. For qualitative comparison of morphology, each genotype was imaged at the maximum level of brightness while avoiding saturation. For quantitative comparisons of intensities, common settings were chosen to avoid oversaturation in any of the genotypes. Image processing was performed using ImageJ v. 1.40g.
Figure 3
Dendrite morphology is unchanged in unc-104− embryos at 16.5 h AEL. (A and B) Confocal images of sensory neurons in embryos that express UAS-actin panneuronally (elav-Gal4/+;;UAS-actin [control] and unc-104/−;UAS-actin [unc-104/−]). (A and B) No morphological alterations were observed in unc-104/− embryos. (A′ and B′) The axonal or dendritic morphology of bipolar (arrowheads) or dendritic arborization neurons (A′′,A′′′,B′′, and B′′′; arrows) is indistinguishable between unc-104− and control embryos. Bars: A, 20 µm; A′ and A′′, 10 µm; A′′′, 1 µm.
The length of NMJs is the sum of the length of all branches. NMJ area was determined by measuring the HRP-positive area. The HRP signal was first rescaled by a factor of 2 and then filtered (Gaussian blur, pixel radius: 2) and z projected (maximum intensity projection). Next, a dynamic threshold was applied to the HRP signal to create a mask that defines the NMJ size. This dynamic threshold is constant within a given genotype, but might differ between genotypes. It was set to 40% of the mean HRP intensity measured in a given genotype. Bouton numbers were counted manually.NMJ size and bouton number were normalized to the square of the muscle length, and NMJ length was normalized to the muscle length. Only muscles within the size range: 180–350 µm were included in the normalization. Nonnormalized NMJ length and size, as well as boutons per NMJ and muscle length are shown for comparison in Supporting Information, Figure S1, A–D.
Locomotion analysis
All solutions used to wash larvae were at room temperature. Behavioral assays were performed at 25° at 70% humidity.For qualitative analysis of larval behavior, single larvae were placed on a thin slice of apple juice agar. Dystonic posterior paralysis behavior was scored visually. The animals were recorded at a frame rate of 30 fps for 5 min using a DCM510 camera (ScopeTek, P. R. China) integrated in a custom-built stereomicroscope. Videos were converted using Prism Video Converter, v. 1.61 (NCH Software, Canberra, Australia) and further processed using VirtualDub 1.9.10 and ImageJ v. 1.40g. Size is the main determinant of larval locomotion speed (Fuger ). We thus analyzed size-matched, rather than stage- or age-matched larvae that might be slower due to delayed development and smaller size.For quantitative analysis, up to 200 larvae were recovered from food, dispersed in 15% sucrose solution, rinsed with tapwater, and stored on a temperature- and humidity-controlled agar plate for 45 min. Next, the larvae were recorded on a 15 × 15 cm agar plate for 10 min. Locomotion speed and size of larvae were analyzed with the custom-built software Animaltracer (Fuger ). Larvae that touched each other were excluded from analysis. Larvae whose velocity was <10% of average velocity of the respective genotype were excluded from analysis. This selection criterion prevented the erroneous inclusion of dead larvae or debris in the dataset. Average locomotion speed was separately calculated for each size group. A minimum of six experiments per genotype were analyzed. For all further statistical analysis, “n” was defined as the number of experiments.
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests were performed with PAST software (http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/index.html) unless otherwise noted. Sample errors are given as standard deviation (SD) and standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical tests used in this study are documented in Table S1. The following alpha levels were used for all tests: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Genetic screen
To score for defects in synapse formation and maintenance, immunostainings of type I boutons of Drosophila larvae were analyzed. At the investigated NMJ (NMJ 4, segment A3) typically >95% of all PSDs are apposed by mature AZs. We used the cytomatrix of the AZ protein Bruchpilot (Brp) (Kittel ) and the glutamate receptor subunit III (GluRIII) (Marrus ) as molecular marker for AZs and PSDs, respectively. Mutant strains in which a significant number of unapposed PSDs or AZs were detected upon visual inspection were isolated for further analysis.
Mapping of bristly
To map the gene mutation, the original stock was outcrossed to a control Drosophila strain (white) for three generations. Next, we identified three overlapping deficiencies (Thibault ; Ryder ) (Df(2R): Exel 7145, Exel 6064, and ED 3181) that failed to complement the locus. These deficiencies overlap at position (2R) 12.618.999–12.714.156 of the Drosophila genome. The same area was identified utilizing recombination-based mapping with molecularly defined P-element insertions (Zhai ). Next, we tested mutations that affect candidate genes in the identified region.
Results
bristly is an allele of the neuronal kinesin-3 family member unc-104/KIF1A
Although cytoskeletal structure, membrane protein sorting, and protein targeting mechanisms can be distinct between dendrites and axons, there are a considerable number of proteins important for both axonal and dendritic morphogenesis (Gao ). We therefore decided to systematically screen mutants with abnormal dendrite morphogenesis for defects in synapse formation and maintenance. We selected () larvae, in which 17% of all PSDs at NMJs 4 are not apposed by a Brp-positive AZ for further characterization (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Bristly (bris) mutants are characterized by defects in synaptogenesis and dendritic filopodia formation. (A) Confocal immunofluorescence images showing several synaptic boutons at NMJ 4 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae. Wild-type and bris larvae were stained for glutamate receptor III (GluRIII, green) and Bruchpilot (Brp, gray and magenta). Many PSDs are unapposed by a presynaptic Brp puncta (arrowheads) in bris larvae. Bar, 1 µm. (B) While dendritic branching of the neuron ddaA (cell body, blue arrowhead) is unaffected, greatly increased filopodia formation at distal secondary branches is detected in bris third-instar larvae. Bar, 20 µm. *For visualization of secondary branches, brightness and contrast were adjusted in both enlargements. Bar, 10 µm.
Bristly (bris) mutants are characterized by defects in synaptogenesis and dendritic filopodia formation. (A) Confocal immunofluorescence images showing several synaptic boutons at NMJ 4 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae. Wild-type and bris larvae were stained for glutamate receptor III (GluRIII, green) and Bruchpilot (Brp, gray and magenta). Many PSDs are unapposed by a presynaptic Brp puncta (arrowheads) in bris larvae. Bar, 1 µm. (B) While dendritic branching of the neuron ddaA (cell body, blue arrowhead) is unaffected, greatly increased filopodia formation at distal secondary branches is detected in bris third-instar larvae. Bar, 20 µm. *For visualization of secondary branches, brightness and contrast were adjusted in both enlargements. Bar, 10 µm.was originally isolated due to enhanced filopodia formation at the tip of the neuron ddaA (Figure 1B and Medina ) but did not show obvious defects in dendritic branching (Figure 1B and Medina ). The XP insertion in the kinesin-3 failed to complement the mutation (Figure 2A, red arrowhead). Sequencing revealed five predicted amino acid changes compared to the referral sequence (Entrez Gene ID: 36876, FBgn0034155): R561H, V722L, D1073E, V1170M, and A1450V (Figure 2B). In contrast to the other four amino acid substitutions, the R561H mutation is absent in the parental strain used to perform the mutagenesis. Except for R561H, the other amino acid substitutions are predicted conservative substitutions. Hence, we concluded that four of the discrepancies from the database sequence (V722L, D1073E, V1170M, and A1450V) are naturally occurring polymorphisms (Figure 2B), while R561H is responsible for the observed phenotype. The original sequences are available in File S1. R561 is a highly conserved residue in the FHA domain (Figure 2, C and D), which is considered potentially important for dimerization and activation of kinesin-3 motors (Huo ).
Figure 2
bristly is an allele of the neuronal kinesin-3 family member unc-104/KIF1A. (A) Schematic of the unc-104 gene locus. Numbers indicate the chromosomal base pair position. Three overlapping deficiencies denoted as black boxes (from top to bottom Df(2R): Exel7145, Exel 6064, ED 3181) failed to complement the bris locus. The three deficiencies overlap at position (2R) 12.618.999–12.714.156 (orange) of the Drosophila genome. The XP insertion unc-104 (red arrowhead) failed to complement bris. Unc-104 is denoted as a green box; other genes in the identified region are shown in blue or pink. (B) Five alterations from the unc-104 reference sequence deposited at Flybase (Entrez GeneID: 36876, FBgn0034155) could be identified. Four of these mutations (V722L, D1073E, V1170M, and A1450V) represent likely polymorphisms because they were present in the parental strain used to perform the mutagenesis (left panel, unc-104 and right panel, parental strain). The original sequencing reads are shown. Arrow indicates the sequenced DNA strand. (C) Predicted domain structure of unc-104 and locations of selected mutations. R561H localizes to a conserved residue in the FHA domain of unc-104. Motor domain, purple; coiled coil-rich region, gray; FHA domain, orange; liprin binding domain (LBD), green; and PH domain, blue. (D) Alignment of Unc-104 in various species [Drosophila melanogaster (D.m.), Tribolium castaneum (T.c.), Caenorhabditis elegans (C. e.), Danio rerio (D.r.), and Homo sapiens (H.s.)]. The mutated R561 residue (red arrowhead) is conserved across all species examined. (E) Unc-104 abundance is not significantly reduced in ventral nerve cords of unc-104 larvae. (F) Percentage of PSDs unapposed by Brp were quantified in NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes: elav-Gal4/+;;UAS-unc-104 (control), unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (unc-104−), and elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (rescue). The standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown as a box, the standard deviation (SD) as a black line. ***P < 0.001. (G) Synaptic boutons at NMJ 4 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae stained for GluRIII (green) and Brp (gray and magenta). Panneuronal expression of unc-104 rescues defects in the apposition of AZs and PSDs. Arrowheads point at PSDs unapposed by a Brp-positive AZ. Bar, 1 µm.
bristly is an allele of the neuronal kinesin-3 family member unc-104/KIF1A. (A) Schematic of the unc-104 gene locus. Numbers indicate the chromosomal base pair position. Three overlapping deficiencies denoted as black boxes (from top to bottom Df(2R): Exel7145, Exel 6064, ED 3181) failed to complement the bris locus. The three deficiencies overlap at position (2R) 12.618.999–12.714.156 (orange) of the Drosophila genome. The XP insertion unc-104 (red arrowhead) failed to complement bris. Unc-104 is denoted as a green box; other genes in the identified region are shown in blue or pink. (B) Five alterations from the unc-104 reference sequence deposited at Flybase (Entrez GeneID: 36876, FBgn0034155) could be identified. Four of these mutations (V722L, D1073E, V1170M, and A1450V) represent likely polymorphisms because they were present in the parental strain used to perform the mutagenesis (left panel, unc-104 and right panel, parental strain). The original sequencing reads are shown. Arrow indicates the sequenced DNA strand. (C) Predicted domain structure of unc-104 and locations of selected mutations. R561H localizes to a conserved residue in the FHA domain of unc-104. Motor domain, purple; coiled coil-rich region, gray; FHA domain, orange; liprin binding domain (LBD), green; and PH domain, blue. (D) Alignment of Unc-104 in various species [Drosophila melanogaster (D.m.), Tribolium castaneum (T.c.), Caenorhabditis elegans (C. e.), Danio rerio (D.r.), and Homo sapiens (H.s.)]. The mutated R561 residue (red arrowhead) is conserved across all species examined. (E) Unc-104 abundance is not significantly reduced in ventral nerve cords of unc-104 larvae. (F) Percentage of PSDs unapposed by Brp were quantified in NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes: elav-Gal4/+;;UAS-unc-104 (control), unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (unc-104−), and elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (rescue). The standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown as a box, the standard deviation (SD) as a black line. ***P < 0.001. (G) Synaptic boutons at NMJ 4 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae stained for GluRIII (green) and Brp (gray and magenta). Panneuronal expression of unc-104 rescues defects in the apposition of AZs and PSDs. Arrowheads point at PSDs unapposed by a Brp-positive AZ. Bar, 1 µm.Previously described null mutants (/Df(2R)DAlk21) are embryonic lethal (Pack-Chung ); however, homozygous unc-104 larvae or transheterozygous (unc-104 and unc-104) larvae die in the third instar larval stage. This new hypomorphic mutation therefore provides a powerful tool to investigate later neuronal processes that might depend on Unc-104/KIF1A. R561H does not adversely affect the stability of Unc-104bris as quantified by immunostaining in ventral nerve cords (Figure 2E). Panneuronal expression of an mCherry-tagged cDNA construct is sufficient to rescue transheterozygous unc-104 larvae (from now on referred to as: unc-104/−) to full viability. Panneuronal expression of unc-104 using elav-Gal4 is also sufficient to rescue defects in the reliable apposition of AZs and PSDs in unc-104/− larvae (Figure 2, F and G). We thus concluded that observed phenotypes are specifically caused by the loss of Unc-104 function.
Dendrite morphogenesis
We next sought to address the cellular basis for the observed dendritic morphology alterations. Dendritic morphology is continuously refined by multiple interrelated pathways controlling outgrowth, branching, guidance, and pruning (Corty ). For simplicity, we only differentiated between initial neurite outgrowth in the developing embryo and dendrite maturation, which includes morphological changes during later outgrowth, branching, guidance, and pruning.expression is first detectable in stage 11 embryos (Pack-Chung ). At 14 h AEL, homozygous null mutant embryos displayed abnormal axonal growth cone morphology (Pack-Chung ). We scored defects in initial sensory neurite outgrowth in midstage 16 embryos (16.5 h AEL), in which unc-104 has been expressed for roughly 10 h to allow for the manifestation of defects. Sensory neurons were visualized by panneuronal expression of UAS-actin. No gross morphological alterations of the peripheral sensory neuron system were observed in unc-104/− embryos (Figure 3, A and B). Dorsal dendrite extension was nearly completed at 16.5 h AEL both in unc-104/− and control embryos. No obvious alterations in axonal or dendritic morphology of bipolar neurons (Figure 3, A′ and B′; arrowheads) or dendritic arborization neurons (Figure 3, A′′, A′′′, B′′, and B′′′; arrows) were observed. Hence, we concluded that the morphological defects observed in L3 larvae (Figure 1B and Medina ) were caused by impairments in dendrite maturation.Dendrite morphology is unchanged in unc-104− embryos at 16.5 h AEL. (A and B) Confocal images of sensory neurons in embryos that express UAS-actin panneuronally (elav-Gal4/+;;UAS-actin [control] and unc-104/−;UAS-actin [unc-104/−]). (A and B) No morphological alterations were observed in unc-104/− embryos. (A′ and B′) The axonal or dendritic morphology of bipolar (arrowheads) or dendritic arborization neurons (A′′,A′′′,B′′, and B′′′; arrows) is indistinguishable between unc-104− and control embryos. Bars: A, 20 µm; A′ and A′′, 10 µm; A′′′, 1 µm.
unc-104 larvae are characterized by impaired larval locomotion
Mutations in the human homolog KIF1A cause HSP (Erlich ; Klebe ) or hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 2 (Riviere ). We sought to use unc-104 larvae as a model for the cellular consequences of a moderate loss of function that might be relevant in the context of HSP.HSP is characterized by progressive spasticity and paralysis of the lower extremities. The selective vulnerability of long motoneuron-axons in the corticospinal tract is an important cellular hallmark of HSP. For HSP type 10 (HSP10) caused by autosomal dominant mutations in KIF5A/khc, this axon length-dependent vulnerability of motoneurons could be replicated in Drosophila larvae by ectopic expression of mutant khc in the wild-type background (HSP10-model larvae) (Fuger ). A selective vulnerability of posterior segments was evident by exacerbated morphological defects at synaptic terminals and dystonic posterior paralysis (tail-flip phenotype) (Fuger ).Neither homozygous unc-104 larvae nor transheterozygous unc-104/− larvae displayed dystonic posterior paralysis, indicating that these larvae suffered from impairments distinct from those caused by impaired Khc function (Hurd and Saxton 1996; Fuger ).HSP10 model larvae displayed a size-dependent reduction in larval locomotion speed that is most pronounced in large larvae (Fuger ). Semiautomated analysis using the custom-built algorithm Animaltracer (Fuger ) revealed that both small and large homozygous unc-104 larvae are slower than control larvae, whereby the degree of impairment in larval locomotion relative to control larvae is independent of larval size (for larval length 1–2.5 mm, wt: 0.42 ± 0.03 mm/s, n = 6; unc-104: 0.19 ± 0.01 mm/s, n = 7 and for larval length 2.5–4 mm, wt: 0.61 ± 0.05 mm/s, n = 6; unc-104: 0.24 ± 0.02 mm/s, n = 8). The genetically more impaired transheterozygous unc-104/− larvae were almost paralyzed (Figure 4A) and displayed a body posture defect (Figure 4B).
Figure 4
Impaired larval locomotor activity in unc-104 larvae. (A) unc-104 larvae are slower than wild-type larvae. unc-104− larvae are largely immobile and die in the late third instar stage. (B) Larvae in the act of crawling. No dystonic posterior paralysis is observed. unc-104− larvae display a body posture defect that can be rescued by panneuronal expression of unc-104. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. ***P < 0.001.
Impaired larval locomotor activity in unc-104 larvae. (A) unc-104 larvae are slower than wild-type larvae. unc-104− larvae are largely immobile and die in the late third instar stage. (B) Larvae in the act of crawling. No dystonic posterior paralysis is observed. unc-104− larvae display a body posture defect that can be rescued by panneuronal expression of unc-104. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. ***P < 0.001.Comparative behavioral analysis revealed that impairments in anterograde molecular motor function caused by either ectopic overexpression of dominant-negative khc constructs or the hypomorphic unc-104 allele led to distinct behavioral defects. Those caused by the unc-104 allele were likely neurodevelopmental and not neurodegenerative in nature, possibly due to the impaired maturation of a subset of synapses.
Synaptic terminals in unc-104 larvae are not subject to neurodegeneration
KIF1A has been shown to be important for hippocampal synaptogenesis and synaptic bouton formation (Hirokawa ). During Drosophila synaptogenesis, Brp is reliably recruited to nascent AZs within a few hours following new PSD formation (Rasse ). This matching of PSDs and AZs is disturbed in unc-104/− larvae. Defects in apposition might occur due to (i) presynaptic nerve retraction, (ii) rate limiting abundance of Brp, (iii) delivery of Brp to extrasynaptic sites, or (iv) disturbances in the molecular mechanism that allocate AZ components such that all synapses receive at least the minimal amount necessary to assemble a fully functional AZ.First, we sought to address whether defects in the apposition of pre- and postsynaptic components are the result of degenerative processes. Distal NMJ regions are preferentially affected by degenerative processes than proximal regions (Sherwood ). In unc-104 larvae, however, unapposed PSDs were distributed in a “salt-and-pepper” pattern throughout the NMJ without obvious regional preference (Figure 5A, arrowheads), indicating that synaptic defects are likely caused by impaired synaptogenesis at the level of individual synapses.
Figure 5
No synapse retraction observed in unc-104 larvae. (A) Proximal and distal synaptic boutons at NMJ 4 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae stained for GluRIII (green) and Brp (gray and magenta). Unapposed PSDs (arrowheads) localize to proximal and distal boutons in unc-104 larvae. Bar, 1 µm. (B–E) NMJ 4, segment A2 or A3 of mid-third instar Drosophila wild-type (B and D) and unc-104 (C and E) larvae were stained for the membrane marker HRP (B and C; magenta), the postsynaptic scaffolding protein Discs-large (Dlg) (B–E, green), and the vesicular glutamate transporter (VGlut) (D and E, gray and magenta). The presence of organized postsynaptic Dlg staining unapposed by presynaptic structures is indicative of synapse retraction, which typically occurs at distal boutons (arrowheads). No synapse retraction was observed in unc-104 larvae. Bars, 10 μm and 2 µm (magnified panel).
No synapse retraction observed in unc-104 larvae. (A) Proximal and distal synaptic boutons at NMJ 4 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae stained for GluRIII (green) and Brp (gray and magenta). Unapposed PSDs (arrowheads) localize to proximal and distal boutons in unc-104 larvae. Bar, 1 µm. (B–E) NMJ 4, segment A2 or A3 of mid-third instar Drosophila wild-type (B and D) and unc-104 (C and E) larvae were stained for the membrane marker HRP (B and C; magenta), the postsynaptic scaffolding protein Discs-large (Dlg) (B–E, green), and the vesicular glutamate transporter (VGlut) (D and E, gray and magenta). The presence of organized postsynaptic Dlg staining unapposed by presynaptic structures is indicative of synapse retraction, which typically occurs at distal boutons (arrowheads). No synapse retraction was observed in unc-104 larvae. Bars, 10 μm and 2 µm (magnified panel).Postsynaptic membranes at the Drosophila NMJ are a complex series of membrane folds (subsynaptic reticulum, SSR) that develop only gradually upon presynaptic innervation and remain stable for hours after presynaptic retraction. Thus, terminal boutons positive for SSR marker but negative for the presynaptic membranes or synaptic vesicles (SV) are indicative of synapse retraction (Eaton ). We visualized the presynaptic membrane, SSR, and SV with antibodies directed against HRP, the postsynaptic Discs-large protein (Dlg), and the vesicular glutamate transporter VGlut, respectively (Mahr and Aberle 2006). No signs of synapse retraction were observed in unc-104 larvae (Figure 5, B–E). Immunostaining analyses suggested delayed SSR development, as more synaptic boutons positive for HRP and VGlut but negative for Dlg (Figure 5, C and E; arrowheads) were observed in homozygous unc-104 larvae (WT: 0.15 ± 0.08, n = 10; unc-104: 0.85 ± 0.08, n = 10; P < 0.001, Student’s two-tailed t-test).Second, the reliable apposition of PSDs and AZs might be disturbed by a rate-limited supply of Brp. The loss of Unc-104 function has been shown to affect cargo transport as quantified by cargo redistribution in the ventral nerve cord (Pack-Chung ; Barkus ). In control larvae, Unc-104 cargos are scant in the cortex and enriched in the neuropil. As previously reported for null embryos (Pack-Chung ), this distribution is reversed in unc-104− larvae (Figure 6A). Furthermore, Brp density and the amount of Brp per NMJ in unc-104− larvae were reduced by 70 and 74%, respectively (Figure 6, B–D). Panneuronal expression of unc-104 was sufficient to rescue impairments in Brp transport (Figure 6, A–D).
Figure 6
Axonal transport of Brp is impaired in unc-104− larvae. (A and A′) Ventral nerve cords of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae were stained for Brp, which is concentrated in the neuropil region (green N) of wild-type larvae, but is found in the cortex of unc-104− larvae (green C). (A′) Panneuronal expression of Unc-104mCherry (rescue) restores Brp neuropil localization in unc-104− larvae. Bar, 20 µm. (B) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes: elav-Gal4/+;;UAS-unc-104 (control), unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (unc-104−), or elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-unc-104y/+ (rescue) were stained for Brp. Bar, 10 µm. (C) Brp density and (D) Brp abundance per NMJ are reduced in unc-104− larvae compared to control larvae and unc-104− larvae expressing unc-104. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Axonal transport of Brp is impaired in unc-104− larvae. (A and A′) Ventral nerve cords of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae were stained for Brp, which is concentrated in the neuropil region (green N) of wild-type larvae, but is found in the cortex of unc-104− larvae (green C). (A′) Panneuronal expression of Unc-104mCherry (rescue) restores Brp neuropil localization in unc-104− larvae. Bar, 20 µm. (B) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes: elav-Gal4/+;;UAS-unc-104 (control), unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (unc-104−), or elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-unc-104y/+ (rescue) were stained for Brp. Bar, 10 µm. (C) Brp density and (D) Brp abundance per NMJ are reduced in unc-104− larvae compared to control larvae and unc-104− larvae expressing unc-104. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.As insufficient supply of Brp is a potential cause of the observed defects in the apposition of AZ and PSDs at unc-104 mutant synaptic terminals, we next rescued overall Brp abundance at NMJs (Figure 7, A and B) by panneuronal overexpression of Brp. Although Brp overexpression was sufficient to restore the overall abundance of Brp at the NMJ and the normal size of individual Brp punctae (Figure 7, A and C), the percentage of presynaptically unapposed PSDs was still four times higher in Brp-overexpressing unc-104/− larvae compared to control larvae (Figure 7, A and D). Brp punctae are generally apposed by PSDs (Figure 7A), suggesting that the molecular mechanisms that prevent AZ formation in the perisynaptic regions of the NMJ are intact in unc-104− larvae. However, PSDs are not reliably apposed by Brp punctae (Figure 7A, arrowheads), indicating that Unc-104 might orchestrate the site-specific delivery of AZ components to defined synapses, thereby ensuring the proper allocation of Brp to all AZs.
Figure 7
Brp overexpression does not rescue the AZ and PSD apposition defect in unc-104/− larvae. (A) Confocal images of neuromuscular synapses immunostained with Brp (magenta and gray) and GluRIIC (green) in larvae of the following genotypes: elav-Gal4/+;; (control), elav-Gal4/+;unc-104− (unc-104−), and elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-Brp/+ (unc-104−,Brp↑). Arrows indicate PSDs unapposed by presynaptic Brp punctae. No Brp punctae without an apposed PSD were detected. Bar, 1 µm. Quantification of the abundance of Brp per NMJ (B), Brp quantity at a single puncta (C), and the percentage of PSDs unapposed by Brp (D). Experiments were performed at 29 °. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Brp overexpression does not rescue the AZ and PSD apposition defect in unc-104/− larvae. (A) Confocal images of neuromuscular synapses immunostained with Brp (magenta and gray) and GluRIIC (green) in larvae of the following genotypes: elav-Gal4/+;; (control), elav-Gal4/+;unc-104− (unc-104−), and elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-Brp/+ (unc-104−,Brp↑). Arrows indicate PSDs unapposed by presynaptic Brp punctae. No Brp punctae without an apposed PSD were detected. Bar, 1 µm. Quantification of the abundance of Brp per NMJ (B), Brp quantity at a single puncta (C), and the percentage of PSDs unapposed by Brp (D). Experiments were performed at 29 °. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Unc-104 is essential to restrict NMJ growth
Impairments in kinesin-1- and kinesin-3-based anterograde transport cause a reduction in NMJ size and a decrease in the number of synaptic boutons (Hurd and Saxton 1996; Barkus ; Fuger ). However, loss of the HSP-associated genes atlastin, spastin, and spichthyin induce NMJ overgrowth (Bayat ).To test whether impaired Unc-104 function leads to morphological changes at the synaptic terminal the following parameters were determined: NMJ length, NMJ size, PSDs per NMJ, boutons per NMJ, bouton size, and number of synapses per bouton. NMJ size is determined by the area of HRP staining. NMJ length is a measure of synaptic terminal outgrowth, while NMJ size and the number of PSDs per NMJ are a measure of both outgrowth and functional maturation. NMJs of unc-104/− larvae were longer but not larger than NMJs in control larvae (Figure 8, A–C). The number of receptor fields per NMJ was decreased in unc-104/− larvae (control: 277 ± 23, n = 9; unc-104/−: 137 ± 8, n = 9; rescue: 226 ± 34, n = 9; control/unc-104/−; P < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis H-test). NMJs of mutant larvae consist of more but smaller synaptic boutons that contain fewer glutamate receptor fields than control boutons, suggesting that terminal outgrowth was not matched by proper functionalization (Figure 8, A and D–G).
Figure 8
Altered NMJ morphology in unc-104− larvae. (A) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila wild-type, unc-104, unc-104, and unc-104− larvae were stained with antibodies against HRP (A and E), GluRIII (E and L), and Brp (L). Bars: A, 10 µm and E and L, 1 µm. NMJ length (B), NMJ size (C), bouton number (D), bouton size (F), and PSD per boutons (G) were determined. The same genotypes were stained with Brp (H). Brp density (I), Brp per NMJ (J), and percentage of PSDs unapposed by Brp (K) were quantified. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (L) PSDs unapposed by a presynaptic Brp puncta (arrowheads) were detected in unc-104 and unc-104− larvae.
Altered NMJ morphology in unc-104− larvae. (A) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila wild-type, unc-104, unc-104, and unc-104− larvae were stained with antibodies against HRP (A and E), GluRIII (E and L), and Brp (L). Bars: A, 10 µm and E and L, 1 µm. NMJ length (B), NMJ size (C), bouton number (D), bouton size (F), and PSD per boutons (G) were determined. The same genotypes were stained with Brp (H). Brp density (I), Brp per NMJ (J), and percentage of PSDs unapposed by Brp (K) were quantified. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (L) PSDs unapposed by a presynaptic Brp puncta (arrowheads) were detected in unc-104 and unc-104− larvae.The overgrowth of unc-104/− NMJs was unexpected because previously described null and hypomorphic alleles cause defects in bouton formation and decreased number of boutons per NMJ, respectively (Pack-Chung ; Barkus ). We thus sought to (i) further investigate the nature of the putatively hypomorphic unc-104 mutation and (ii) verify that defects are solely caused by a presynaptic loss of Unc-104 function.The phenotype of hypomorphic alleles is less severe when homozygous than transheterozygous to a null allele or a deletion. unc-104/− larvae have stronger impairments in larval locomotion than homozygous unc-104 larvae. Generally, morphological defects were more pronounced in the former (Figure 8, A, B, D, E, and G–L); however, this difference was only statistically significant for Brp density (Figure 8I). Defects in bouton size do not follow this general trend (Figure 8F). Despite a smaller bouton size and less PSDs per bouton, no NMJ morphogenesis defects were observed in heterozygous unc-104 larvae (Figure 8, E–G).RNAi-mediated knockdown of Unc-104 in neurons (elav-Gal4, D42-Gal4) but not in muscles (Mhc-Gal4, 24B-Gal4) is sufficient to induce lethality (data not shown). No Unc-104 signal was detectable in nonneuronal tissue (Pack-Chung ). Panneuronal expression of unc-104 in the mutant background was sufficient to rescue defects in NMJ morphogenesis (Figure 9, A–G). Postsynaptic expression of unc-104 did not rescue neuromuscular morphological defects (Figure 10, A–C).
Figure 9
Panneuronal expression of unc-104 rescues NMJ morphology defects in unc-104− larvae. (A) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes elav-Gal4/+;;UAS-unc-104 (control), unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (unc-104−), and elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (rescue) were stained with antibodies against HRP (A and E) and GluRIII (E). Enlargements of A are shown in the lower panel. Bars: A, 10 µm and E, 1 µm. NMJ length (B), NMJ size (C), bouton number (D), bouton size (F), and PSDs per boutons (G) were determined. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 10
Postsynaptic expression of unc-104 does not rescue morphological defects in unc-104− larvae. (A–C) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes: wild-type, unc-104−, and unc-104−;24B-Gal4/UAS-unc-104 (postsynaptic rescue) were stained for the membrane marker HRP. No rescue was detectable following postsynaptic expression of unc-104. Enlargements are shown in the lower panel. Bar, 10 µm.
Panneuronal expression of unc-104 rescues NMJ morphology defects in unc-104− larvae. (A) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes elav-Gal4/+;;UAS-unc-104 (control), unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (unc-104−), and elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-unc-104 (rescue) were stained with antibodies against HRP (A and E) and GluRIII (E). Enlargements of A are shown in the lower panel. Bars: A, 10 µm and E, 1 µm. NMJ length (B), NMJ size (C), bouton number (D), bouton size (F), and PSDs per boutons (G) were determined. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.Postsynaptic expression of unc-104 does not rescue morphological defects in unc-104− larvae. (A–C) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes: wild-type, unc-104−, and unc-104−;24B-Gal4/UAS-unc-104 (postsynaptic rescue) were stained for the membrane marker HRP. No rescue was detectable following postsynaptic expression of unc-104. Enlargements are shown in the lower panel. Bar, 10 µm.Overall, the morphological and behavioral analyses suggest that (i) unc-104 is a hypomorphic allele and (ii) defects are solely caused by loss of neuronal Unc-104 function.
NMJ overgrowth is independent of presynaptic Brp abundance
NMJ overgrowth in unc-104 mutants, as quantified by NMJ length and the number of synaptic boutons, might be attributable to the loss of a specific function of Unc-104. Alternatively, defects in AZ assembly and maturation of synapses caused by the loss of Brp from some synapses might induce compensatory NMJ overgrowth.We favor the former possibility for the following reasons: first, reduction in synaptic Brp levels alone, using transgenic RNAi, do not cause changes in overall NMJ size (Wagh ). Second, Brp clusters calcium channels at AZs (Kittel ). Reduced expression of the voltage-dependent calcium channel subunit cacophony (cac) or a point mutation (cacNT27) that disrupts calcium entry and subsequent vesicle fusion limits NMJ growth rather than promoting NMJ overgrowth (Rieckhof ).If NMJ overgrowth is triggered as a compensatory response to the reduced level of synaptic Brp, further reduction or overexpression of Brp should exacerbate or rescue existing defects, respectively. To evaluate this hypothesis, we utilized previously validated UAS-Brp and Brp-RNAi constructs (Wagh ). NMJ overgrowth was neither suppressed by the overexpression of Brp nor exacerbated by further reduction of Brp using RNAi (Figure 11, A–F). Defects in the enlargement and maturation of boutons persisted both after decreasing and increasing Brp abundance (Figure 11, E and F). We thus conclude that neither the overgrowth of NMJs nor the defects in bouton enlargement are secondary to reduced Brp abundance at the NMJ or its loss from a subset of AZs. Rather, they constitute novel functions of the Unc-104 FHA domain in limiting NMJ length and coordinating bouton enlargement.
Figure 11
Altering Brp abundance does not overtly alter NMJ morphology. (A–F) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes: elav-Gal4/+;unc-104− (unc-104−), elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−,UAS-Brp-RNAi/+ (Brp↓), and elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-Brp/+ (Brp↑) were stained for the membrane marker HRP (A). The following characteristics of NMJs were determined: NMJ length (B), NMJ size (C), bouton number (D), bouton size (E), and PSDs per bouton (F). Bar, 10 µm. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line.
Altering Brp abundance does not overtly alter NMJ morphology. (A–F) NMJ 4, segment A2 of mid-third instar Drosophila larvae of the following genotypes: elav-Gal4/+;unc-104− (unc-104−), elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−,UAS-Brp-RNAi/+ (Brp↓), and elav-Gal4/+;unc-104−;UAS-Brp/+ (Brp↑) were stained for the membrane marker HRP (A). The following characteristics of NMJs were determined: NMJ length (B), NMJ size (C), bouton number (D), bouton size (E), and PSDs per bouton (F). Bar, 10 µm. The SEM is shown as a box, the SD as a black line.
Discussion
Sensory neurons that normally bear actin-rich filopodia display increased filopodial density in unc-104 mutants with no obvious defects in dendritic branching (observed herein and previously Medina ). Interestingly, alterations in the structure of actin-rich dendritic spines were among the first neuroanatomical changes associated with mental retardation (Marin-Padilla 1972). More than 100 genes that coordinate dendrite arborization have been identified to date. Among these genes are two molecular motors: KIF5 (Hoogenraad ) and dynein (Zhou ). Our results suggest that Unc-104-based dendritic transport is important for maintaining correct dendrite morphology. Because no defects in dendrites were detected 16.5 h AEL, we concluded that impaired Unc-104 function during later outgrowth, branching, guidance, and pruning leads to the defects in larval dendrite morphology described here. Sensory neuron dendritic arbor morphology has been suggested to affect the ability of cells to perceive and transmit external stimuli (Hall and Treinin 2011). The resulting association between form and function might explain the divergence of dendritic morphologies. For example, class I, II, and III multidendritic sensory neurons, which respond to touch and serve as proprioceptors to coordinate larval contraction wave propagation, differ morphologically from class IV multidendritic neurons that sense noxious stimuli, such as heat, high-threshold mechanical stimuli, parasitoid wasps, and noxious light (Hall and Treinin 2011; Tsubouchi ). unc-104 larvae are characterized by enhanced filopodia formation. As the number of dendritic sensory filopodia can correlate with the strength of the gentle touch response in class III multidendritic neurons (Tsubouchi ), a detailed investigation of the behavioral responses to external stimuli in unc-104 larvae might enhance our understanding of the molecular pathways underlying sensory neuron dendrite structure and function.
Synapse apposition
unc-104 larvae are characterized by impairments in the reliable apposition of AZs and PSDs as quantified by staining for Brp (Wagh ) and glutamate receptors. Brp clusters calcium channels at AZs and stabilizes T-bars, which are electron-dense presynaptic structures that have been shown to facilitate synaptic release (Kittel ). In wild-type larvae, primarily very young (<3 h), immature synapses are Brp negative (Rasse ). Because Brp-negative synapses have a low vesicle release probability, the accumulation of Brp at nascent AZs is an important step during synapse maturation (Rasse ; Kittel ; Schmid ). The high percentage of Brp-negative synapses in the unc-104 mutant suggests that synapse maturation is impaired either by rate-limiting axonal transport of Brp, defective delivery of Brp to AZs, or the inability to stabilize synaptic Brp. Restoration of Brp abundance at NMJs in unc-104 larvae ameliorates but does not rescue defects in the apposition of AZs and PSDs. We thus propose that the R561H mutation in Unc-104’s FHA domain might disrupt a previously unknown function of Unc-104 in orchestrating the site-specific delivery of Brp to defined synapses.The specificity of defects caused by the R561H mutation is further supported by the analysis of unc-104 mutant embryos. The total amount of Brp per NMJ at 21 h AEL was more severely reduced than in unc-104 larvae (Pack-Chung ). Nonetheless, no defects in the apposition of AZ and PSDs were reported; most PSDs were apposed by a weak Brp-positive signal (Pack-Chung ).The precise coordination of synaptic cargo delivery to defined synapses is important to functionalize and facilitate these synapses (for review see Vitureira ; Clarke ). Intact Unc-104/KIF1A-based cargo trafficking might, reminiscent of kinesin-1-based long-range transport (Puthanveettil ), be important for the late phase of long-term potentiation (Bliss and Lomo 1973), which is highly relevant in the context of learning and memory. Indeed, environmental enrichment has been shown to be sufficient to induce brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-dependent up-regulation of KIF1A (Kondo ). The resulting hippocampal synaptogenesis and learning enhancement is absent in transheterozygous Bdnf+/− and Kif1a+/− mutant mice, highlighting that Unc-104/KIF1A is essential for experience-dependent neuroplasticity (Kondo ).We propose that the presynaptic mechanism underlying neuroplasticity depends on both Unc-104-based long-range axonal transport and the site-specific delivery of synaptic cargo to defined synapses. Both processes might be perturbed by mutation of the R561 residue that localizes to the β11-loop of the FHA domain. The corresponding residue (R583) in KIF1A has been suggested to further stabilize kinesin-3 dimers by electrostatic interaction with the E499 residue (Huo ). Further investigation of the effects of R561H on the activation and deactivation of Unc-104 upon cargo loading and release might provide novel insights into the biomechanics of kinesin-3-based cargo trafficking.
Molecular pathways underlying structural defects at NMJs
The herein described overgrowth of NMJs in unc-104 larvae was surprising as both impairments in kinesin-1- and kinesin-3-based anterograde transport were reported to result in reductions in both NMJ size and synaptic bouton number (Hurd and Saxton 1996; Barkus ; Fuger ). Conversely, phenotypic comparison with other HSP-associated genes revealed that the NMJ overgrowth is a common phenotype in HSP fly models. Null alleles in atlastin, spastin, and spichthyin result in synaptic bouton number increases of 17, 60, and 100% respectively (Bayat ).Interestingly, in unc-104− larvae, NMJ overgrowth and defects in bouton enlargement and maturation seem to be independent of Unc-104’s role in fast axonal transport of AZ components and might thus represent novel functions of Unc-104.Defects in bidirectional communication between muscles and motoneurons might induce NMJ overgrowth. The absence of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-signaling suppressors, such as daughters against decapentaplegic and the HSP-related gene spichthyin, causes NMJ overgrowth (Sweeney and Davis 2002; Wang ). Thus, the NMJ overgrowth observed in unc-104 larvae is consistent with potential overactivation of BMP signaling. Due to the importance of BMP signaling in synapse stabilization (Eaton and Davis 2005), its overactivation might prevent the elimination of functionally impaired synaptic terminals in unc-104 mutant larvae.
Conclusions
Our identification of a novel allele highlights the importance of kinesin activity during later stages of neuronal development. The results described here shed light on three previously unknown roles of Unc-104. First, it is important for maintaining correct dendritic morphology. Second, Unc-104 is required for the reliable apposition of AZs and glutamate receptor fields. Third, Unc-104 is important to limit NMJ outgrowth as measured by NMJ length and bouton number.Alterations in dendritic and synaptic terminal maturation are independently associated with mental retardation and neurodegeneration. The fact that a single amino acid substitution of arginine for histidine in the FHA domain of Unc-104 is sufficient to perturb all these processes presents an ideal tool to decipher the biophysical underpinnings of neurodevelopmental disorders.Further study is needed to decipher the exact role of Unc-104 in orchestrating synaptic terminal outgrowth and functional maturation. Studies of the FHA domain in a biochemical setting may provide novel insights into (i) the biomechanics of kinesin-3-based cargo trafficking, (ii) Unc-104’s roles in synapse development and synaptic plasticity, and (iii) the molecular mechanism underlying HSP and neurodevelopmental diseases in which synapses might fail to mature.
Authors: Gang Qin; Tobias Schwarz; Robert J Kittel; Andreas Schmid; Tobias M Rasse; Dennis Kappei; Evgeni Ponimaskin; Manfred Heckmann; Stephan J Sigrist Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2005-03-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Casper C Hoogenraad; Aaron D Milstein; Iryna M Ethell; Mark Henkemeyer; Morgan Sheng Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Andreas Schmid; Stefan Hallermann; Robert J Kittel; Omid Khorramshahi; Andreas M J Frölich; Christine Quentin; Tobias M Rasse; Sara Mertel; Manfred Heckmann; Stephan J Sigrist Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2008-05-11 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Annette L Parks; Kevin R Cook; Marcia Belvin; Nicholas A Dompe; Robert Fawcett; Kari Huppert; Lory R Tan; Christopher G Winter; Kevin P Bogart; Jennifer E Deal; Megan E Deal-Herr; Deanna Grant; Marie Marcinko; Wesley Y Miyazaki; Stephanie Robertson; Kenneth J Shaw; Mariano Tabios; Valentina Vysotskaia; Lora Zhao; Rachel S Andrade; Kyle A Edgar; Elizabeth Howie; Keith Killpack; Brett Milash; Amanda Norton; Doua Thao; Kellie Whittaker; Millicent A Winner; Lori Friedman; Jonathan Margolis; Matthew A Singer; Casey Kopczynski; Daniel Curtis; Thomas C Kaufman; Gregory D Plowman; Geoffrey Duyk; Helen L Francis-Lang Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2004-02-22 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Anna Phan; Connon I Thomas; Molee Chakraborty; Jacob A Berry; Naomi Kamasawa; Ronald L Davis Journal: Neuron Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Jiaxing Li; Yao V Zhang; Elham Asghari Adib; Doychin T Stanchev; Xin Xiong; Susan Klinedinst; Pushpanjali Soppina; Thomas Robert Jahn; Richard I Hume; Tobias M Rasse; Catherine A Collins Journal: Elife Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Jun-Yi Zhu; Natalia Vereshchagina; Vrinda Sreekumar; Lena F Burbulla; Ana C Costa; Katharina J Daub; Dirk Woitalla; L Miguel Martins; Rejko Krüger; Tobias M Rasse Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jian Cao; Julie Ni; Wenxiu Ma; Vanessa Shiu; Luis A Milla; Sangbin Park; Maria L Spletter; Sheng Tang; Jun Zhang; Xing Wei; Seung K Kim; Matthew P Scott Journal: Genetics Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.562