Literature DB >> 23770568

Carbon catabolite repression of the maltose transporter revealed by X-ray crystallography.

Shanshuang Chen1, Michael L Oldham, Amy L Davidson, Jue Chen.   

Abstract

Efficient carbon utilization is critical to the survival of microorganisms in competitive environments. To optimize energy usage, bacteria have developed an integrated control system to preferentially uptake carbohydrates that support rapid growth. The availability of a preferred carbon source, such as glucose, represses the synthesis and activities of proteins necessary for the transport and metabolism of secondary carbon sources. This regulatory phenomenon is defined as carbon catabolite repression. In enteric bacteria, the key player of carbon catabolite repression is a component of the glucose-specific phosphotransferase system, enzyme IIA (EIIA(Glc)). It is known that unphosphorylated EIIA(Glc) binds to and inhibits a variety of transporters when glucose is available. However, understanding the underlying molecular mechanism has been hindered by the complete absence of structures for any EIIA(Glc)-transporter complexes. Here we present the 3.9 Å crystal structure of Escherichia coli EIIA(Glc) in complex with the maltose transporter, an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter. The structure shows that two EIIA(Glc) molecules bind to the cytoplasmic ATPase subunits, stabilizing the transporter in an inward-facing conformation and preventing the structural rearrangements necessary for ATP hydrolysis. We also show that the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of the full-length EIIA(Glc) and an amino-terminal truncation mutant differ by 60-fold, consistent with the hypothesis that the amino-terminal region, disordered in the crystal structure, functions as a membrane anchor to increase the effective EIIA(Glc) concentration at the membrane. Together these data suggest a model of how the central regulatory protein EIIA(Glc) allosterically inhibits maltose uptake in E. coli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770568      PMCID: PMC3875231          DOI: 10.1038/nature12232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) is common in bacteria and higher organisms; up to 5-10% of all bacterial genes are subject to CCR regulation[1]. Different organisms use different pathways to achieve CCR. In E. coli, CCR is mediated by the modulation of the phosphorylation state of the glucose-specific enzyme IIA (EIIAGlc)[1,2]. EIIAGlc is a member of the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP): carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) that transports and concomitantly phosphorylates several preferred carbohydrates[1,2]. The influx of PTS substrates and other readily metabolizable carbon sources increases the level of unphosphorylated EIIAGlc by affecting the intracellular [PEP]-[pyruvate] ratio[5]. Phosphorylated EIIAGlc stimulates cAMP synthesis[2], which leads to transcriptional activation of many catabolic genes. Unphosphorylated EIIAGlc directly inhibits several non-PTS sugar transport systems, including the maltose transporter (MalFGK2), lactose permease (LacY), melibiose permease (MelB), and raffinose permease (RafB)[2]. It also prevents glycerol uptake by binding to the glycerol kinase, an enzyme key to glycerol metabolism[2]. These carbohydrates or their derivatives function as inducers to control the synthesis of the corresponding transporters and metabolic enzymes. Thus, interaction of EIIAGlc with the transporter not only directly prevents secondary carbon source uptake, but also down regulates the expression of the corresponding catabolic systems by reducing the intracellular level of the inducer[1,2]. The regulation of the lac operon is the best known example of this feedback mechanism called inducer exclusion[1,2]. The mechanisms of how EIIAGlc regulates target transporters have been studied for decades. Mutants of the lactose, maltose, raffinose, and melibiose permeases that abolish inducer exclusion have been isolated[2]. The interfaces between EIIAGlc and the target transporters have been probed biochemically[2]. While those studies have identified some of the residues involved in the interaction, no structure of any transporter in complex with EIIAGlc is yet available. The maltose transporter MalFGK2 belongs to the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. It consists of two transmembrane (TM) subunits, MalF and MalG, and two copies of the ATPase subunits, MalK. The structure of MalK can be further divided into an N-terminal nucleotide binding domain (NBD) and a C-terminal regulatory domain (RD). Crystal structures of the maltose transporter have been determined in three distinct functional states. The inward-facing conformation, also known as the resting state in which the transporter has very low basal ATPase activity, was obtained in the absence of maltose and nucleotides[6]. The outward-facing conformation, corresponding to a hydrolysis competent intermediate, was stabilized by the periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP) and ATP[7]. Finally, a pre-translocation complex, which shows how substrate initiates the transport cycle, was captured in the presence of the MBP but in the absence of ATP[8]. These structures illustrate the coordinated motions of the transporter that couple ATP hydrolysis to maltose translocation[6-8]. On this foundation, the maltose transporter would be a productive system to study how sugar transport is regulated under conditions subject to inducer exclusion. To obtain crystals of the maltose transporter bound with EIIAGlc, we tested many constructs including full-length and truncated proteins devoid of flexible regions. It was unclear whether EIIAGlc binds to the transporter in the resting state or an intermediate conformation induced by MBP and/or ATP. Therefore, we carried out crystallization experiments with different combinations of cofactors. Crystals were obtained with full-length MalFGK2 and EIIAGlc in the absence of MBP and ATP. Initially, the crystals obtained in detergent diffracted X-rays poorly (about 15 – 20 Å). Crystals grown in lipid/detergent bicelles diffracted to 7 Å resolution. Dehydration caused the unit cell to shrink by 20 Å in one dimension and improved the resolution to 3.9 Å. The structure was determined by molecular replacement and refined with deformable elastic network (DEN) constraints (Table S1). The asymmetric unit of the crystal contains two copies of the complex, each consisting of one transporter MalFGK2 and two EIIAGlc molecules (Fig. 1). The maltose transporter shows a conformation similar to that of the resting state[6]. The root mean square deviation (rmsd) of the transporter (1,168 Cα positions, excluding flexible regions) between the resting state and the EIIAGlc complex structure is 2.2 Å (Fig. S1). In this conformation, the transmembrane maltose-binding site is exposed to the intracellular side of the membrane (inward-facing). In contrast to the resting state in which the periplasmic P2 loop is disordered, the structure of the P2 loop is well resolved (Fig. 1 and Fig. S2). The relative orientation of the P2 loop is different between the two structures in the asymmetric unit, likely influenced by crystal packing (Fig. S3 and Fig. S4). The two EIIAGlc molecules are bound at structurally equivalent positions, interacting exclusively with the intracellular MalK subunits. The EIIAGlc-binding sites are distant from the Walker A motifs that bind ATP (Fig. 2a), the maltose-binding site in MalF, and the periplasmic loops to which maltose-MBP docks. Thus, EIIAGlc is a classical Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) allosteric inhibitor of the maltose transporter[9].
Figure 1

Two orthogonal views of the EIIAGlc-MalFGK2 complex

Both a ribbon diagram (left) and a slab view (right) are shown. In the lower panel, EIIAGlc is represented by a transparent surface, with the solid line representing the front molecule and dotted line representing the backside one.

Figure 2

Binding of EIIAGlc prevents MalK closure

a, MalK dimer bound with EIIAGlc. EIIAGlc is shown in purple. The two MalK subunits are coloured in red and green. The nucleotide binding domain (NBD) and regulatory domain (RD) within each MalK subunit are rendered in different shades. The ATP binding site (the Walker A motif) in the front subunit (green) is indicated by an arrow. b, Stereoview of a superposition of the closed MalK dimer, coloured as in panel a, with the open dimer coloured in grey. ATP is shown in stick model. The arrows indicate the rotations of the NBDs necessary to form the closed dimer. c, EIIAGlc-MalK interface. Inducer exclusion resistant mutants are labeled. The active site His 90 of EIIAGlc and Gln 122 of MalK are shown in stick models, and the Hydrogen bond between His 90 and Gln 122 is indicated by a dashed line. d, Surface presentations of EIIAGlc. Residues located within 4.5 Å from the NBD (left) or RD (right) are coloured. Yellow, the 11 residues (Val 39, Val 40, Phe 41, Ile 45, Val 46, Lys 69, Phe 71, Glu 72, Phe 88, His 90, and Val 96) involved in interacting with all four EIIAGlc partners: MalK, glycerol kinase, HPr, and EIIBGlc. The phosphorylation site His 90 is labeled. Blue, MalK interacting residues that are not part of the canonical binding surface

The MalK subunits form an open dimer, interacting with each other through their C-terminal RD domains (Fig. 2a). Each EIIAGlc is wedged between the NBD of one MalK and the RD of the opposite MalK, linking these two domains together (Fig. 2a). Of the 1,500 Å2 buried surface area on EIIAGlc, approximately 55% is buried at the NBD interface and the other 45% at the RD interface. From this structure, it becomes apparent why binding of EIIAGlc would inhibit the maltose transporter. In contrast to the open dimer stabilized by EIIAGlc, in the outward-facing state the two NBDs of MalK make contact with each other and two ATPs lie buried along the NBD interface (Fig. 2b). Superposition of the resting state and outward-facing structures shows that the conformational changes of MalK observed in the transport cycle are achieved principally by interdomain rotations of the NBDs relative to the RDs (Fig. 2b). In effect, the MalK subunits resemble a pair of tweezers, with the RDs acting as the fulcrum point allowing the two NBDs to open and close like the pincers[10]. Here we observe that by linking the NBD of one MalK with the opposite RD, the two EIIAGlc molecules fasten the tweezers in the open configuration. The two TM subunits MalF and MalG are docked onto the MalK NBDs, and conformational changes in the NBDs are tightly coupled to those of the TM domains[7] (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Thus, by preventing closure of the NBDs, EIIAGlc prevents the formation of the outward-facing conformation, a key step for ATP hydrolysis and maltose translocation. In excellent agreement with the crystal structure, all mutations that render resistance to EIIAGlc inhibition reside in the MalK subunit[11,12]. Among the eight mutations isolated, five make direct interactions with EIIAGlc in the crystal structure (Fig. 2c). The others, G278P, G302D, and S322F, are located in close proximity to the interface and likely produce local conformational changes that prevent EIIAGlc from binding (Fig. 2c). The structure of EIIAGlc observed in the complex (residues 19-168) is very similar to that of the free form[13], with an overall rmsd of 0.5 Å. This reinforces the observation that neither phosphorylation nor binding to target proteins induces substantial conformational changes of EIIAGlc 14-17. As a central signaling molecule, EIIAGlc interacts with many proteins that share little sequence or structural similarity[2]. The NBD of MalK binds to a canonical surface of EIIAGlc that normally interacts with other partners (Fig. 2d, left). Of the 17 residues making contacts with the NBD, 11 are also involved in interacting with glycerol kinase, EIIBGlc, and HPr[14-16] (Fig. 2d, left). The majority of the interface residues are hydrophobic, consistent with the promiscuous interactions this surface makes with different proteins. The crystal structure also shows why phosphorylation prevents the binding of EIIAGlc to the maltose transporter. The phosphorylation site His 90[18], located at the EIIAGlc-MalK interface, is in its unphosphorylated form and Hydrogen bonded with Gln 122 of MalK (Fig. 2c). Adding a negatively charged phosphate group to the side chain of His 90 would disrupt the interface, thus relieving the maltose transporter from inducer exclusion. As previously suggested by antibody and peptide mapping experiments[19,20], residues contacting the RD are located away from the active site, forming an interface unique to the maltose transporter complex (Fig. 2d, right). Although the N-terminal 18 residues of EIIAGlc are disordered in the crystal structure, data from other studies suggested that this region might still play an important role in stabilizing the EIIAGlc-MalFGK2 complex. Studies of synthetic peptides showed that residues 3-10 of EIIAGlc form an amphipathic helix in the presence of either detergent micelles or lipid vesicles (Fig. 3a), suggesting that it may function as a membrane anchor[3,4]. Furthermore, removing the N-terminal region of EIIAGlc hinders its interaction with membrane transporters, but not soluble partners[19,21-23]. In the EIIAGlc-MalFGK2 structure, EIIAGlc is oriented such that the N-terminus is pointed towards the membrane. The first ordered residue Thr 19 is approximately 20 Å outside the lipid bilayer (Fig. 3b). To test the function of the N-terminal region, we compared the inhibition of maltose-MBP stimulated ATPase activity by full-length EIIAGlc and a truncation mutant consisting of residues 19-168 (Δ1-18). The maltose transporter was reconstituted into lipid nanodiscs to allow access of MBP and EIIAGlc to both sides of the membrane. Both constructs of EIIAGlc inhibit with positive cooperativity (Fig. 3c), consistent with the 2:1 stoichiometry of the complex and an earlier observation that inhibition of maltose uptake was sigmoidally related to EIIAGlc concentration[24]. However, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of the Δ1-18 construct is 60 times higher than that of the full-length protein (91 μM versus 1.6 μM). This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that the full-length protein is concentrated near the membrane through the N-terminal region. Given that the intracellular concentration of EIIAGlc is around 50 μM[25], the membrane-anchoring function of the N-terminal region would be very important to ensure efficient inhibition of the transporter. The high IC50 value of the Δ1-18 construct also explains the lack of inhibition observed with a similar construct from a previous study, where the concentration used in the assay was approximately 24 μM[19].
Figure 3

The N-terminus of EIIAGlc likely functions as a membrane anchor

a, Structure of the N-terminal peptide determined by NMR in dihexanoyl phosphatidylglycerol (PDB 1O53)[4]. Hydrophobic residues lining one side of the helix are shown in yellow. Hydrophilic residues on the opposite side of the helix are shown in blue. b, Close-up view of EIIAGlc bound to MalK. The two terminal residues visible in the crystal structure (Thr 19 and Lys 168) are labeled. c,d, Inhibition of the MBP-stimulated ATPase activity of reconstituted nanodiscs by full-length (c) and N-terminal truncated EIIAGlc (d). Data points represent the means ± standard deviation of triplicate measurements. Insets show enlargements of the figures fitted to the Hill equation (black line) and to the Michaelis-Menten equation (grey line). e, Summary table of the kinetics.

On the basis of the structural and functional data, we propose a model for inducer exclusion of the maltose transporter (Fig. 4). The uptake and concomitant phosphorylation of glucose lead to dephosphorylation of EIIAGlc through a cascade of enzymes. Unphosphorylated EIIAGlc binds to the resting state maltose transporter and locks the MalK dimer in the open configuration. Ordinarily, binding of the maltose-loaded MBP and ATP are sufficient to promote the transition from the inward-facing, resting state to the outward-facing, ATPase active state – the very conformational change that allows maltose entry from the periplasm and also enables ATP hydrolysis at the same time. Under inducer exclusion, EIIAGlc stabilizes the resting state such that MBP and ATP binding can no longer initiate the transport cycle. The maltose transporter is the only ABC transporter known to be inhibited by EIIAGlc; however, similar allosteric regulation mechanisms by the transported substrate itself have been described for the methionine transporter and the molybdate transporter[26,27]. In both cases, at high intracellular concentrations, methionine or molybdate binds to allosteric sites in the ATPase subunits to stabilize the transporter in the inward-facing state, thus preventing further substrate uptake[26,27].
Figure 4

Inhibition of the maltose transporter by inducer exclusion

Left, Glucose and other PTS substrates are transported and phosphorylated by five coupled reactions, leading to an increased level of unphosphorylated EIIAGlc. Right, the maltose transport cycle. In the resting state, the open MalK dimer coincides with the inward-facing TM domains. Upon association of MBP, the transporter undergoes a conformational change (the pre-translocation state) that permits ATP to promote a concerted motion of MalK closure, reorientation of the TM domains, and opening of MBP. Formation of the outward-facing conformation transfers maltose from MBP to the TM binding site, and at the same time positions ATP at the catalytic site for hydrolysis. ATP hydrolysis releases maltose into the cytoplasm and resets the transporter to the resting state. Under conditions subject to inducer exclusion, unphosphorylated EIIAGlc binds and stabilizes the resting state transporter, thus inhibiting maltose transport.

Previously it was shown that binding of EIIAGlc to two other transporters, LacY and MelB, were enhanced by their corresponding sugar substrates[28,29]. However, for the maltose transporter no cooperativity between substrate and EIIAGlc binding was observed[30]. Consistent with the functional data, the crystal structure offers no evidence that the EIIAGlc-MalFGK2 interaction would be affected by the presence of maltose. LacY and MelB are homologous proteins belonging to the major facilitator superfamily, unrelated to ABC transporters. Thus, it is likely that the mechanism underlying LacY and MelB regulation is different from that of the maltose transporter.

Methods

Expression and purification of MalFGK2

Expression and purification of the maltose transporter MalFGK2 with a 6×-His tag at the C-terminus of MalK were carried out as described previously[7]. In brief, the HN741 host strain [E. coli K-12 argH his tpsL1 malT(Con) malBΔ13 ΔatpBC ilv∷Tn10/F′ lacIqTn5] containing chromosomal deletions of the genes of the maltose transport system was transformed simultaneously with three compatible antibiotic-resistance plasmids carrying malF/malG (AmpicillinR), malK (ChloramphenicolR) and lacIq (SpectinomycinR). Cells were grown in Terrific Broth (Novagen) supplemented with ampicillin, chloramphenicol and spectinomycin (Sigma) at 37 °C until OD600 = 0.7∼0.9, and then induced with 50 μM IPTG at 22 °C for 20 hours before harvesting by centrifugation at 4,000g for 15 min. Resuspended cells were broken by two passes through a high-pressure homogenizer (Emulsiflex-C5; Avestin) and centrifuged at 80,000g for 40 min to isolate the E. coli membrane fraction. After resuspending the membranes in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, and 0.3% n-Dodecyl-β-D-Maltopyranoside (DDM, Anatrace) at a total protein concentration of 5 mg/ml, the extracted maltose transporter was purified by cobalt-affinity (Clontech) and gel filtration (Superdex 200, GE Healthcare) chromatography in buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, and 0.012% DDM.

Expression and purification of EIIAGlc

Genes encoding the full-length or (Δ1-18) EIIAGlc were cloned into a pMCSG7 LIC vector with a 10×-His tag followed by a TEV protease cleavage site at the N-terminus of the protein. The E. coli strain, BL21 Star (DE3), was transformed and grown in Luria–Bertani medium (MP Biomedicals) at 37 °C until OD600 = 0.6-0.8 before induction by 100 μM IPTG at 16 °C for 20 hours. EIIAGlc was purified by cobalt-affinity chromatography in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 150 mM NaCl, and then incubated with TEV protease to remove the N-terminal 10×-His tag. Tag-free EIIAGlc was further purified by ion-exchange (Source 15Q, GE Healthcare) and gel filtration (Superdex 75, GE Healthcare) chromatography in buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl.

Expression and purification of MBP

Expression and purification of wild-type MBP was carried out similarly to that of EIIAGlc via metal affinity and gel filtration chromatography.

Crystallization of EIIAGlc-MalFGK2 complex

Preparation of a 35% bicelle stock was carried out as described previously31,32. In brief, 0.26 g 1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphocholine (DMPC, Avanti Polar Lipids) and 0.09 g 3-(ChlorAmidoPropyl)-dimethylammonio-2-Hydroxyl-1-Propane Sulfonate (CHAPSO, Affymetrix) were dissolved in nanopure water at a final volume of 1 ml. Multiple cycles of incubation at 42 °C, vortexing, incubation on ice, and vortexing were performed to obtain a homogeneous bicelle stock that exhibited a temperature induced phase transition between a transparent viscous gel at room temperature and a milky solution on ice. A pre-chilled protein sample containing purified MalFGK2 and EIIAGlc at 1:2.5 molar ratio was mixed with the bicelle stock at a 4:1 ratio (v/v) on ice. The final sample for crystallization is composed of 10 mg/ml MalFGK2, 2.5 mg/ml EIIAGlc, 0.01% DDM and 7% bicelles. Crystals were grown at 22 °C by vapor diffusion using reservoir solution containing 100 mM sodium cacodylate pH 5.6 (Sigma), 13% PEG monomethylether 2000 (Sigma) and 100 mM NDSB-256 (Non Detergent Sulfobetaine; Hampton Research). Dehydration was performed by replacing the reservoir solution every 24 hours with increasing PEG (5% per step) to a final concentration of 35%. After dehydration, crystals were looped and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Data collection and structure determination

X-ray diffraction data were collected at the Advanced Photon Source (APS-23ID) at 100 K. Diffraction images were processed and scaled with HKL2000 (HKL Research, Inc.). The structure of EIIAGlc-MalFGK2 complex was solved via molecular replacement33 (PHASER, CCP434) using structures of isolated EIIAGlc (PDB: 1F3G)[13] and the resting state MalFGK2 (PDB: 3FH6)[6]. The initial model was refined with deformable elastic network (DEN) constraints35 in CNS36, and then improved by cycles of manual building in COOT37 and refinement in Phenix38.

Reconstitution of MalFGK2 into nanodiscs

Reconstitution of MalFGK2 into nanodiscs was performed as described previously39. In brief, a lipid stock (50 mg/ml) was prepared from chloroform dissolved E. coli total lipids (Avanti Polar Lipids) after drying under Argon and resuspension into buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5. Dissolved lipids were purged with Argon and then sonicated to clarity. The membrane scaffold protein (MSP) was expressed and purified as described39. To prepare the nanodiscs, a mixture of E. coli lipids, sodium cholate, purified MalFGK2 and MSP at 120 μg/ml, 25 mM, 10 μM and 50 μM concentrations, respectively, was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour with gentle rocking. Nanodiscs were assembled using a 5:1 molar ratio of MSP:MalFGK2 to minimize the incorporation of more than one MalFGK2 complex per nanodisc. Nanodisc self-assembly was then initiated by adding hydrated Bio-Beads to remove the detergent. Bio-Beads were then removed after 3 hours of incubation at 22 °C. The mixture was loaded onto cobalt affinity resin pre-equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 100 mM NaCl. The resin was washed extensively to remove MalFGK2-free nanodiscs. Nanodiscs containing MalFGK2 were eluted and loaded on a desalting column to remove imidazole.

Kinetic characterization of inhibition of the maltose transporter ATPase by EIIAGlc

The ATPase activity was determined using an ATP-regeneration/NADH-consumption coupled system40,41 and reconstituted MalFGK2 in nanodiscs. Different amounts of EIIAGlc were added into 100 μl reaction mixture containing 50 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 94 nM MalFGK2, 15 μM MBP, 1 mM maltose, 60 μg/ml pyruvate kinase, 32 μg/ml lactate dehydrogenase, 4 mM phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), 0.3 mM NADH and 10 mM MgCl2. After incubation for 2 hours at 25 °C, 1 mM ATP was added to initiate the reaction. The absorbance at 340 nm was recorded using the 8453 UV-Vis Diode Array System (Agilent Technologies) at 25 °C for 5 minutes. All measurements were performed three times from the same protein preparations. Data were fit to either the Hill or the Michaelis-Menten equation using SigmaPlot.

Figure preparation

All structure figures were prepared with the program PyMOL (www.pymol.org).
  30 in total

1.  Solution structure of the phosphoryl transfer complex between the signal-transducing protein IIAGlucose and the cytoplasmic domain of the glucose transporter IICBGlucose of the Escherichia coli glucose phosphotransferase system.

Authors:  Mengli Cai; David C Williams; Guangshun Wang; Byeong Ryong Lee; Alan Peterkofsky; G Marius Clore
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Effects of mutations and truncations on the kinetic behavior of IIAGlc, a phosphocarrier and regulatory protein of the phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Norman D Meadow; Regina S Savtchenko; S James Remington; Saul Roseman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Crystal structure of the maltose transporter in a pretranslocation intermediate state.

Authors:  Michael L Oldham; Jue Chen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sugar transport by the bacterial phosphotransferase system. Reconstitution of inducer exclusion in Salmonella typhimurium membrane vesicles.

Authors:  T P Misko; W J Mitchell; N D Meadow; S Roseman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Regulation of the maltose transport system of Escherichia coli by the glucose-specific enzyme III of the phosphoenolpyruvate-sugar phosphotransferase system. Characterization of inducer exclusion-resistant mutants and reconstitution of inducer exclusion in proteoliposomes.

Authors:  D A Dean; J Reizer; H Nikaido; M H Saier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-12-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  A novel membrane anchor function for the N-terminal amphipathic sequence of the signal-transducing protein IIAGlucose of the Escherichia coli phosphotransferase system.

Authors:  G Wang; A Peterkofsky; G M Clore
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Regulation of lactose permease activity by the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system: evidence for direct binding of the glucose-specific enzyme III to the lactose permease.

Authors:  T Osumi; M H Saier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients.

Authors:  Boris Görke; Jörg Stülke
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 60.633

9.  Alternating access in maltose transporter mediated by rigid-body rotations.

Authors:  Dheeraj Khare; Michael L Oldham; Cedric Orelle; Amy L Davidson; Jue Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  The high-affinity E. coli methionine ABC transporter: structure and allosteric regulation.

Authors:  Neena S Kadaba; Jens T Kaiser; Eric Johnson; Allen Lee; Douglas C Rees
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  34 in total

1.  Structural and mechanistic insights into prokaryotic energy-coupling factor transporters.

Authors:  Dirk J Slotboom
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Mechanistic diversity in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters.

Authors:  Kaspar P Locher
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 3.  Membrane proteins, detergents and crystals: what is the state of the art?

Authors:  Patrick J Loll
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 1.056

4.  Crystal structures of a polypeptide processing and secretion transporter.

Authors:  David Yin-wei Lin; Shuo Huang; Jue Chen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Multiscale Simulations of Biological Membranes: The Challenge To Understand Biological Phenomena in a Living Substance.

Authors:  Giray Enkavi; Matti Javanainen; Waldemar Kulig; Tomasz Róg; Ilpo Vattulainen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Biochemical characterization of a nitrogen-type phosphotransferase system reveals that enzyme EI(Ntr) integrates carbon and nitrogen signaling in Sinorhizobium meliloti.

Authors:  Reed A Goodwin; Daniel J Gage
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system: regulation by protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Josef Deutscher; Francine Moussan Désirée Aké; Meriem Derkaoui; Arthur Constant Zébré; Thanh Nguyen Cao; Houda Bouraoui; Takfarinas Kentache; Abdelhamid Mokhtari; Eliane Milohanic; Philippe Joyet
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Nucleotide-free MalK drives the transition of the maltose transporter to the inward-facing conformation.

Authors:  Huan Bao; Franck Duong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Insights into the inhibitory mechanisms of the regulatory protein IIA(Glc) on melibiose permease activity.

Authors:  Parameswaran Hariharan; Lan Guan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Structural insight into the PTS sugar transporter EIIC.

Authors:  Jason G McCoy; Elena J Levin; Ming Zhou
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.