Literature DB >> 23770162

Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Florent Le Ven1, Mélanie Freeman, John Webb, Marie-Annick Clavel, Miriam Wheeler, Éric Dumont, Chris Thompson, Robert De Larochellière, Robert Moss, Daniel Doyle, Henrique B Ribeiro, Marina Urena, Luis Nombela-Franco, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Philippe Pibarot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of baseline left ventricular (LV) outflow, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and transvalvular gradient on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).
BACKGROUND: Low flow (i.e., reduced stroke volume index [SVi]) can occur with both reduced and preserved LVEF. Low flow is often associated with low gradient despite severe stenosis and with worse outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement. However, there are few data about the impact of low flow on outcomes following TAVR.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, Doppler-echocardiographic, and outcome data prospectively collected in 639 patients who underwent TAVR for symptomatic severe AS in 2 Canadian centers.
RESULTS: In this cohort, 334 (52.3%) patients had a low flow (SVi <35 ml/m(2)) and these patients had increased 30-day mortality (11.4 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.01), 2-year all-cause mortality (35.3 vs. 30.9%, p = 0.005), and 2-year cardiovascular mortality (25.7 vs. 16.8%, p = 0.01) compared with patients with normal flow. Reduced flow was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio: 1.94, p = 0.026), cumulative all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.27 per 10 ml/m(2) SVi decrease, p = 0.016), and cumulative cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 1.29 per 10 ml/m(2) decrease, p = 0.04). Despite significant association in univariable analyses, low LVEF and low mean gradient were not found to be independent predictors of outcomes in multivariable analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Low flow but not low LVEF or low gradient is an independent predictor of early and late mortality following TAVR in high-risk patients with severe AS. SVi should be integrated in the risk stratification process of these patients.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AS; CI; Doppler-echocardiography; HG; HR; LEF; LF; LG; LV; LVEF; MG; NEF; NF; OR; SVi; TAVR; aortic stenosis; confidence interval; hazard ratio; high gradient; left ventricle/ventricular; left ventricular ejection fraction; low ejection fraction; low flow; low gradient; mean gradient; normal ejection fraction; normal flow; odds ratio; stroke volume index; transcather aortic valve implantation; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770162     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  37 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Low-Flow States Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Todd L Kiefer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Transcatheter valve interventions in heart failure: new answers to old questions.

Authors:  Marijana Tadic; Cesare Cuspidi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Futility, benefit, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Karen P Alexander; Patrick T O'Gara; Jonathan Afilalo
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Invasive hemodynamic assessments during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of patient outcomes in higher vs. lower transvalvular gradients with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jury Schewel; Dimitry Schewel; Christian Frerker; Peter Wohlmuth; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Dynamic changes in aortic impedance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its impact on exploratory outcome.

Authors:  Yukari Kobayashi; Juyong B Kim; Kegan J Moneghetti; Yuhei Kobayashi; Ran Zhang; Daniel A Brenner; Ryan O'Malley; Ingela Schnittger; Michael Fischbein; D Craig Miller; Alan C Yeung; David Liang; Francois Haddad; William F Fearon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Geometry of the left ventricular outflow tract assessed by 3D TEE in patients with aortic stenosis: impact of upper septal hypertrophy on measurements of Doppler-derived left ventricular stroke volume.

Authors:  Dan Koto; Masaki Izumo; Takafumi Machida; Kengo Suzuki; Kihei Yoneyama; Tomomi Suzuki; Ryo Kamijima; Yasuyuki Kobayashi; Tomoo Harada; Yoshihiro J Akashi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2018-05-24

7.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

8.  Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease: Role of Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Romain Capoulade; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 9.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Impact of Ejection Fraction and Aortic Valve Gradient on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Suzanne J Baron; Suzanne V Arnold; Howard C Herrmann; David R Holmes; Wilson Y Szeto; Keith B Allen; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; Sreekaanth Vemulapali; Sean O'Brien; Dadi Dai; David J Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.