Literature DB >> 23770044

A metasynthesis of risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies.

Suzanne Lee1, Susan Ayers2, Des Holden3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies affects their decisions about perinatal care and is of interest to anyone involved in the care of pregnant women. This paper provides a metasynthesis of qualitative studies of risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies.
METHODS: a systematic search of eight electronic databases was conducted. Additional papers were obtained through searching references of identified articles. Six studies were identified that reported qualitative research into risk perception in relation to high risk pregnancy. A metasynthesis was developed to describe and interpret the studies.
FINDINGS: the synthesis resulted in the identification of five themes: determinants of risk perception; not seeing it the way others do; normality versus risk; if the infant is ok, I׳m ok; managing risk.
CONCLUSIONS: this metasynthesis suggests women at high risk during pregnancy use multiple sources of information to determine their risk status. It shows women are aware of the risks posed by their pregnancies but do not perceive risk in the same way as healthcare professionals. They will take steps to ensure the health of themselves and their infants but these may not include following all medical recommendations.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; High risk pregnancy; Risk management; Risk perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770044     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  9 in total

1.  Prevalence of adverse birth outcomes and associated factors in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Fatimah H Dallak; Ibrahim M Gosadi; Wejdan N Haidar; Amjad A Durayb; Abeer R Alomaish; Atheer H Alshamakhi; Raoud M Khormi; Ali H Almudeer; Majed A Alibrahim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Knowledge Valuation by Iranian Women with High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

Authors:  Zahra Shojaeian; Talat Khadivzadeh; Ali Sahebi; Hossein Kareshki; Fatemeh Tara
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2020-07

3.  Relationship Between Advanced Maternal Age and Timing of First Developmental Evaluation in Children with Autism.

Authors:  Eric Rubenstein; Maureen S Durkin; Rebecca A Harrington; Russell S Kirby; Laura A Schieve; Julie Daniels
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2018 Oct/Nov       Impact factor: 2.225

4.  Antenatal Care Utilisation and Content between Low-Risk and High-Risk Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Ping Ling Yeoh; Klaus Hornetz; Maznah Dahlui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pregnancy related risk perception in pregnant women, midwives & doctors: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Suzanne Lee; Des Holden; Rebecca Webb; Susan Ayers
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Perceived Risk in Women with High Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Zahra Shojaeian; Talat Khadivzadeh; Ali Sahebi; Hossein Kareshki; Fatemeh Tara
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2021-03-05

Review 7.  Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies.

Authors:  Emily Bartsch; Karyn E Medcalf; Alison L Park; Joel G Ray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-04-19

8.  Risk perceptions among high-risk pregnant women in Nepal: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sushma Rajbanshi; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Perceptions of risk in pregnancy with chronic disease: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Ralston; Priscilla Smith; Joseph Chilcot; Sergio A Silverio; Kate Bramham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.