Literature DB >> 2377

Lorazepam as a premedication.

G Gale, S Galloon.   

Abstract

A double-blind random study compared the effects of lorazepam and pantopon an intra-muscular premedication in healthy women for uterine curettage (D & C). Anxiety, as assessed by a self-rating test by the patient and by a trained observer, showed a significant reduction at one and one-half hours after lorazepam and a smaller reduction after pantopon, which was not significant. Sedation was satisfactory with no significant difference between the two drugs in the change before and after the premedication. Lorazepam showed much more amnesia than pantopon (p less than 0.001). The patients who had lorazepam required higher doses of thiopentone for the operation, and this, in part, led to longer intervals in recovery times after lorazepam. However, it is suggested that lorazepam itself was partly responsible for the longer recovery. Pantopon was followed by more nausea, vomiting and headaches, than lorazepam. The intra-muscular injection of lorazepam hurt more patients than did pantopon, but other local complications were negligible and comparable in both groups. The results of this study show that lorazepam produces better reduction of anxiety and much more amnesia than pantopon, with comparable sedation and much less nausea and vomiting. The only disadvantage of lorazepam is the lack of analgesia and, therefore, the need for more anaesthesia during the operation. The conclusion is that lorazepam is a very satisfactory premedication and warrants more use as such.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 2377     DOI: 10.1007/BF03004991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J        ISSN: 0008-2856


  8 in total

1.  OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT OF SEDATION. II. A SIMPLE SCORING SYSTEM.

Authors:  H I NISBET; W NORRIS
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  A comparative study of four premedications.

Authors:  S A FELDMAN
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Controlled comparison of lorazepam and pentobarbital as hypnotics for presurgical patients.

Authors:  W F Powell; W H Comer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Double-blind controlled comparison of lorazepam and glutethimide as night-before-operation hypnotics.

Authors:  W F Powell; W H Comer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1973 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Central nervous system and cardiovascular effects of lorazepam in man.

Authors:  H W Elliott; N Nomof; G Navarro; H W Ruelius; J A Knowles; W H Comer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1971 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  A comparison of lorazepam and diazepam as oral premedicants for surgery under regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  J A Magbagbeola
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Lorazepam (WY 4036) as a pre-operative medication.

Authors:  N J Paymaster
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Wy 4036 (lorazepam): a study of its use in premedication.

Authors:  W Norris; P G Wallace
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 9.166

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Lorazepam: a review of its clinical pharmacological properties and therapeutic uses.

Authors:  B Ameer; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  The effect of intravenous cimetidine on the absorption of orally administered diazepam and lorazepam.

Authors:  W A McGowan; J W Dundee
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  New drugs--boon or bane? Premedication and intravenous induction agents.

Authors:  R S Clarke
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1983-03

4.  Pre-anaesthetic medication in paediatric day-care surgery.

Authors:  R Desjardins; S Ansara; J Charest
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1981-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.