Literature DB >> 23769917

Comparing neural response to painful electrical stimulation with functional MRI at 3 and 7 T.

Andreas Hahn1, Georg S Kranz, Eva-Maria Seidel, Ronald Sladky, Christoph Kraus, Martin Küblböck, Daniela M Pfabigan, Allan Hummer, Arvina Grahl, Sebastian Ganger, Christian Windischberger, Claus Lamm, Rupert Lanzenberger.   

Abstract

Progressing from 3T to 7 T functional MRI enables marked improvements of human brain imaging in vivo. Although direct comparisons demonstrated advantages concerning blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal response and spatial specificity, these mostly focused on single brain regions with rather simple tasks. Considering that physiological noise also increases with higher field strength, it is not entirely clear whether the advantages of 7T translate equally to the entire brain during tasks which elicit more complex neuronal processing. Therefore, we investigated the difference between 3T and 7 T in response to transcutaneous electrical painful and non-painful stimulation in 22 healthy subjects. For painful stimuli vs. baseline, stronger activations were observed at 7 T in several brain regions including the insula and supplementary motor area, but not the secondary somatosensory cortex (p<0.05 FWE-corrected). Contrasting painful vs. non-painful stimulation limited the differences between the field strengths to the periaqueductal gray (PAG, p<0.001 uncorrected) due to a similar signal increase at 7 T for both the target and specific control condition in most brain regions. This regional specificity obtained for the PAG at higher field strengths was confirmed by an additional spatial normalization strategy optimized for the brainstem. Here, robust BOLD responses were obtained in the dorsal PAG at 7 T (p<0.05 FWE-corrected), whereas at 3T activation was completely missing for the contrast against non-painful stimuli. To summarize, our findings support previously reported benefits obtained at ultra-high field strengths also for complex activation patterns elicited by painful electrical stimulation. However, this advantage depends on the region and even more on the contrast of interest. The greatest gain at 7 T was observed within the small brainstem region of the PAG, where the increased field strength offered marked improvement for the localization of activation foci with high spatial specificity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3T; 7T; Pain stimulation; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769917     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  25 in total

1.  The influence of respiration on brainstem and cardiovagal response to auricular vagus nerve stimulation: A multimodal ultrahigh-field (7T) fMRI study.

Authors:  Roberta Sclocco; Ronald G Garcia; Norman W Kettner; Kylie Isenburg; Harrison P Fisher; Catherine S Hubbard; Ilknur Ay; Jonathan R Polimeni; Jill Goldstein; Nikos Makris; Nicola Toschi; Riccardo Barbieri; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Uncertainty during pain anticipation: the adaptive value of preparatory processes.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Seidel; Daniela M Pfabigan; Andreas Hahn; Ronald Sladky; Arvina Grahl; Katharina Paul; Christoph Kraus; Martin Küblböck; Georg S Kranz; Allan Hummer; Rupert Lanzenberger; Christian Windischberger; Claus Lamm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Towards a mechanistic understanding of the human subcortex.

Authors:  Birte U Forstmann; Gilles de Hollander; Leendert van Maanen; Anneke Alkemade; Max C Keuken
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Learning-based 3T brain MRI segmentation with guidance from 7T MRI labeling.

Authors:  Minghui Deng; Renping Yu; Li Wang; Feng Shi; Pew-Thian Yap; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Learning-Based 3T Brain MRI Segmentation with Guidance from 7T MRI Labeling.

Authors:  Renping Yu; Minghui Deng; Pew-Thian Yap; Zhihui Wei; Li Wang; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Mach Learn Med Imaging       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 6.  Challenges and opportunities for brainstem neuroimaging with ultrahigh field MRI.

Authors:  Roberta Sclocco; Florian Beissner; Marta Bianciardi; Jonathan R Polimeni; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Polymorphism in the µ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) modulates neural processing of physical pain, social rejection and error processing.

Authors:  M Bonenberger; P L Plener; R C Groschwitz; G Grön; B Abler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Voxel-based morphometry at ultra-high fields. a comparison of 7T and 3T MRI data.

Authors:  Rene Seiger; Andreas Hahn; Allan Hummer; Georg S Kranz; Sebastian Ganger; Martin Küblböck; Christoph Kraus; Ronald Sladky; Siegfried Kasper; Christian Windischberger; Rupert Lanzenberger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Individual diversity of functional brain network economy.

Authors:  Andreas Hahn; Georg S Kranz; Ronald Sladky; Sebastian Ganger; Christian Windischberger; Siegfried Kasper; Rupert Lanzenberger
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-12-29

10.  Ketamine-Induced Modulation of the Thalamo-Cortical Network in Healthy Volunteers As a Model for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Anna Höflich; Andreas Hahn; Martin Küblböck; Georg S Kranz; Thomas Vanicek; Christian Windischberger; Alois Saria; Siegfried Kasper; Dietmar Winkler; Rupert Lanzenberger
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 5.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.