Literature DB >> 23769913

How brain oscillations form memories--a processing based perspective on oscillatory subsequent memory effects.

Simon Hanslmayr1, Tobias Staudigl.   

Abstract

Brain oscillations are increasingly recognized by memory researchers as a useful tool to unravel the neural mechanisms underlying the formation of a memory trace. However, the increasing numbers of published studies paint a rather complex picture of the relation between brain oscillations and memory formation. Concerning oscillatory amplitude, for instance, increases as well as decreases in various frequency bands (theta, alpha, beta and gamma) were associated with memory formation. These results cast doubt on frameworks putting forward the idea of an oscillatory signature that is uniquely related to memory formation. In an attempt to clarify this issue we here provide an alternative perspective, derived from classic cognitive frameworks/principles of memory. On the basis of Craik's levels of processing framework and Tulving's encoding specificity principle we hypothesize that brain oscillations during encoding might primarily reflect the perceptual and cognitive processes engaged by the encoding task. These processes may then lead to later successful retrieval depending on their overlap with the processes engaged by the memory test. As a consequence, brain oscillatory correlates of memory formation could vary dramatically depending on how the memory is encoded, and on how it is being tested later. Focusing on oscillatory amplitude changes and on theta-to-gamma cross-frequency coupling, we here review recent evidence showing how brain oscillatory subsequent memory effects can be modulated, and sometimes even be reversed, by varying encoding tasks, and the contextual overlap between encoding and retrieval.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769913     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  69 in total

1.  Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Frontal midline theta oscillations during working memory maintenance and episodic encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Liang-Tien Hsieh; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Reinstatement of distributed cortical oscillations occurs with precise spatiotemporal dynamics during successful memory retrieval.

Authors:  Robert B Yaffe; Matthew S D Kerr; Srikanth Damera; Sridevi V Sarma; Sara K Inati; Kareem A Zaghloul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Predicting and Improving Recognition Memory Using Multiple Electrophysiological Signals in Real Time.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 5.  Memory formation during anaesthesia: plausibility of a neurophysiological basis.

Authors:  R A Veselis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Bidirectional electric communication between the inferior occipital gyrus and the amygdala during face processing.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Kazumi Matsuda; Keiko Usui; Naotaka Usui; Yushi Inoue; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Subsequent memory effect in intracranial and scalp EEG.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; John F Burke; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Prestimulus theta in the human hippocampus predicts subsequent recognition but not recall.

Authors:  Maxwell B Merkow; John F Burke; Joel M Stein; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Blocking of irrelevant memories by posterior alpha activity boosts memory encoding.

Authors:  Hyojin Park; Dong Soo Lee; Eunjoo Kang; Hyejin Kang; Jarang Hahm; June Sic Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Decreased event-related theta power and phase-synchrony in young binge drinkers during target detection: An anatomically-constrained MEG approach.

Authors:  A Correas; E López-Caneda; L Beaton; S Rodríguez Holguín; L M García-Moreno; L F Antón-Toro; F Cadaveira; F Maestú; K Marinkovic
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.