Literature DB >> 23769646

Effect of an image-sharing network on CT utilization for transferred trauma patients: a 5-year experience at a level I trauma center.

Kevin J Psoter1, Bahman S Roudsari2, Matthew Vaughn3, Gabriel C Fine4, Jeffrey G Jarvik5, Martin L Gunn4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of an image-sharing network established between referring hospitals and a level I trauma center on CT utilization at the trauma center.
METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional review board. The requirement for informed consent was waived. Harborview Medical Center's trauma registry was linked to billing department data, and detailed information on all resources utilized during each patient's hospitalization was obtained. Negative binomial regression was used to evaluate body region-specific CT utilization between direct-admit and transfer patients after adjustment for potential confounding variables. Special attention was paid to 2005 as the year internet-based image sharing between Harborview Medical Center and referring hospitals was established.
RESULTS: A total of 81,159 trauma patients were admitted to Harborview Medical Center (44% transfers) during the study period. The utilization of head CT slightly increased from 1996 to 2005, with no significant difference between direct-admit and transfer patients. Between 2005 and 2010, utilization remained relatively unchanged; however, significantly higher utilization rates were observed for direct-admit patients. A relatively similar pattern was observed for pelvic CT; however, between 2005 and 2010, CT use was greater for direct-admit compared with transfer patients. Abdominal and thoracic CT was relatively unchanged between 2005 and 2010. However, both studies had significantly higher utilization rates for direct-admit patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The utilization rates of CT of different body regions have been higher for direct-admit trauma patients compared with transfer patients since 2005; however, decreasing utilization trends have been observed in recent years.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; image sharing; imaging; information systems; patient transfers; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769646      PMCID: PMC3930620          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  30 in total

1.  Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations.

Authors:  Mythreyi Bhargavan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  High and rising health care costs. Part 2: technologic innovation.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Inpatient radiology utilization: trends over the past decade.

Authors:  Amin Matin; David W Bates; Andrew Sussman; Pablo Ros; Richard Hanson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity.

Authors:  Luigi Lepanto; Guy Paré; David Aubry; Pierre Robillard; Jacques Lesage
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Outside images on CD: a management nightmare.

Authors:  Richard L Morin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Diagnostic imaging costs: are they driving up the costs of hospital care?

Authors:  Molly T Beinfeld; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005.

Authors:  Joshua Broder; David M Warshauer
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-08-10

8.  Prospective evaluation of the potential role of teleradiology in acute interhospital trauma referrals.

Authors:  A W Kirkpatrick; F D Brenneman; A McCallum; K Breeck; B R Boulanger
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-06

9.  Transfer times to definitive care facilities are too long: a consequence of an immature trauma system.

Authors:  David T Harrington; Michael Connolly; Walter L Biffl; Sarah D Majercik; William G Cioffi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Repeat imaging in trauma transfers: a retrospective analysis of computed tomography scans repeated upon arrival to a Level I trauma center.

Authors:  Dawn M Emick; Timothy S Carey; Anthony G Charles; Mark L Shapiro
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.313

View more
  4 in total

1.  Creation of a Multi-vendor Image-Sharing Solution.

Authors:  Rajeev Nowrangi; Laurie A Perry; Jennifer Regan; David Hulefeld; Sarah O'Brien; Timothy J OConnor; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.903

2.  Trends in Inpatient Utilization of Head Computerized Tomography Scans in the United States: A Brief Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ali Seifi; Seyedmohammad Jafari; Seyyedmohammadsadeq Mirmoeeni; Amirhossein Azari Jafari; Niyousha Naderi; Armin Safdarpour; Sepehr Seifi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 3.  Image Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Hye-Young Jung; Aaron Ostrovsky; Lala Tanmoy Das; Geraldine B McGinty
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Considerations for Exchanging and Sharing Medical Images for Improved Collaboration and Patient Care: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

Authors:  Amy Vreeland; Kenneth R Persons; Henri Rik Primo; Matthew Bishop; Kimberley M Garriott; Matthew K Doyle; Elliott Silver; Danielle M Brown; Chris Bashall
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.056

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.