Literature DB >> 23768943

Initial experience with the use of foetal/neonatal bovine acellular dermal collagen matrix (SurgiMend™) for tissue-expander breast reconstruction.

Rika Ohkuma1, Kate J Buretta, Raja Mohan, Gedge D Rosson, Ariel N Rad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is commonly used in staged breast reconstruction using tissue expanders (TEs). The literature on human ADM has reported variable outcomes, and there is a paucity of data for xenogenic sources of ADM. The aim of this study is to evaluate the early complications, risk factors and outcomes using SurgiMend™ in staged breast reconstruction.
METHODS: An Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, retrospective analysis of a single surgeon's experience was performed. From August 2009 to May 2011, 65 patients underwent staged breast reconstruction using 95 sheets of SurgiMend™. The nominal TE fill volume was 383 ± 83 cc (range 250-550), mean intra-operative fill volume was 148 ± 86 cc (range 0-350) and mean final fill volume was 413 ± 176 cc (range 100-800). The mean clinic follow-up time was 16.9 ± 8.7 months; mean age was 50.9 ± 11.7 years; and average body mass index (BMI) was 26.0 ± 5.5 kg m(-2). Correlation with risk factors and clinical outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS: The incidences of postoperative complications were: haematoma 3.2%, seroma 7.5% and re-operation due to infection 2.1%. Age, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension had a significant correlation with an increased overall complication rate. With respect to early complications, such as infection requiring re-operation, diabetes demonstrated a trend with an odds ratio of 11.69.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the use of SurgiMend™ is associated with low early complication rates and is well tolerated in staged breast reconstruction.
Copyright © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADM; BMI; Bovine acellular dermal matrix; Breast reconstruction; CDC; Centers for Disease Control; ETO; IMF; IRB; Institutional Review Board; SurgiMend™; TE; acellular dermal matrix; body-mass index; ethylene oxide; inframammary fold; tissue expander

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23768943     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

1.  Biological Matrices and Synthetic Meshes Used in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction - a Review of Products Available in Germany.

Authors:  M Dieterich; A Faridi
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Comparisons of Therapeutic and Aesthetic Effects of One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Biological Matrix.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Zhongzhao Wang; Xiangyi Kong; Xiangyu Wang; Yi Fang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  A Head-to-head Comparison between SurgiMend and Epiflex in 127 Breast Reconstructions.

Authors:  Christian Eichler; Nadine Vogt; Klaus Brunnert; Axel Sauerwald; Julian Puppe; Mathias Warm
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-07-08

4.  A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Orion P Keifer; Eugenia K Page; Alexandra Hart; Randall Rudderman; Grant W Carlson; Albert Losken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.