Literature DB >> 23768611

Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve at 3.0 T using different MR scanners: agreement of FA and ADC measurements.

Roman Guggenberger1, Daniel Nanz, Lorenz Bussmann, Avneesh Chhabra, Michael A Fischer, Jürg Hodler, Christian W A Pfirrmann, Gustav Andreisek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the median nerve on 3.0 T MR scanners from different vendors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approved study including 16 healthy volunteers (9 women; mean age 30.6 ± 5.3 years). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the dominant wrist was performed on three 3.0 T MR scanners (GE, Siemens, Philips) using similar imaging protocols and vendor-proprietary hard- and software. Intra-, inter-reader and inter-vendor agreements were assessed.
RESULTS: ICCs for intra-/inter-reader agreements ranged from 0.843-0.970/0.846-0.956 for FA, and 0.840-0.940/0.726-0.929 for ADC, respectively. ANOVA analysis identified significant differences for FA/ADC measurements among vendors (p < 0.001/p < 0.01, respectively). Overall mean values for FA were 0.63 (SD ± 0.1) and 0.999 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s (SD ± 0.134 × 10(-3)) for ADC. A significant negative measurement bias was found for FA values from the GE scanner (-0.05 and -0.07) and for ADC values from the Siemens scanner (-0.053 and -0.063 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s) as compared to the remainder vendors
CONCLUSION: FA and ADC values of the median nerve obtained on different 3.0 T MR scanners differ significantly, but are in comparison to the standard deviation of absolute values small enough to not have an impact on larger group studies or when substantial diffusion changes can be expected. However, caution is warranted in an individual patient when interpreting diffusion values from different scanner acquisitions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion tensor imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Median nerve; Peripheral neuropathy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23768611     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  10 in total

1.  Accelerated magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging with blipped CAIPIRINHA.

Authors:  Lukas Filli; Marco Piccirelli; David Kenkel; Andreas Boss; Andrei Manoliu; Gustav Andreisek; Himanshu Bhat; Val M Runge; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Can data repositories help find effective treatments for complex diseases?

Authors:  Gregory K Farber
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  MR neurography of ulnar nerve entrapment at the cubital tunnel: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

Authors:  Julia B Breitenseher; Gottfried Kranz; Alina Hold; Dominik Berzaczy; Stefan F Nemec; Thomas Sycha; Michael Weber; Daniela Prayer; Gregor Kasprian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Brain extraction in pediatric ADC maps, toward characterizing neuro-development in multi-platform and multi-institution clinical images.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Randy L Gollub; Kallirroi Retzepi; Nathaniel Reynolds; Rudolph Pienaar; Steve Pieper; Shawn N Murphy; P Ellen Grant; Lilla Zöllei
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Adaptive distance metric learning for diffusion tensor image segmentation.

Authors:  Youyong Kong; Defeng Wang; Lin Shi; Steve C N Hui; Winnie C W Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Visualization of nerve fibers around the carotid bifurcation with use of a 9.4 Tesla microscopic magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging with tractography.

Authors:  Shin Saito; Hiroyuki Ozawa; Masato Fujioka; Keigo Hikishima; Junichi Hata; Sho Kurihara; Hirotaka James Okano; Kaoru Ogawa
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Quantitative MR-Neurography at 3.0T: Inter-Scanner Reproducibility.

Authors:  Fabian Preisner; Rouven Behnisch; Véronique Schwehr; Tim Godel; Daniel Schwarz; Olivia Foesleitner; Philipp Bäumer; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Moritz Kronlage
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of the normal diffusion tensor imaging values of the median nerve and how they change in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Djamila Rojoa; Firas Raheman; Joseph Rassam; Ryckie G Wade
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Utility of MRI Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Jingxu Ma; Liping Zhao; Yunling Wang; Xiaowen Jia
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-03-04

10.  MRI biomarkers of proximal nerve injury in CIDP.

Authors:  Thorsten Lichtenstein; Alina Sprenger; Kilian Weiss; Karin Slebocki; Barbara Cervantes; Dimitrios Karampinos; David Maintz; Gereon R Fink; Tobias D Henning; Helmar C Lehmann
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.511

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.