Literature DB >> 23766503

Higher postural heart rate increments on head-up tilt correlate with younger age but not orthostatic symptoms.

Colleen T Ives1, Kurt Kimpinski.   

Abstract

Reports have shown that younger individuals present with higher postural heart rate increments on head-up tilt (HUT). However, a correlation between the degree of heart rate increment and symptoms of orthostatic intolerance has not been determined. The objective of this study was to determine whether higher postural heart rate increments during HUT correlate with symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in healthy subjects. Postural heart rate increment on HUT did not differ between men and women (P = 0.48) but did show a significant decrease by age group (P < 0.0001). There was a significant negative correlation between heart rate increment on HUT and age [r = -0.63 (-0.73, -0.51), r(2) = 0.400; P < 0.0001]. There was a significant difference with respect to symptoms of orthostatic intolerance by sex (P = 0.03) but not age (P = 0.58). There was no significant correlation between either symptoms of orthostatic intolerance and age [r = -0.13 (-0.31, 0.06), r(2) = 0.017; P = 0.17] or heart rate increment on HUT and symptoms of orthostatic intolerance [r = 0.15 (-0.04, 0.33), r(2) = 0.022; P = 0.13]. The results demonstrate that higher postural heart rate increments in younger individuals do not result in an increase in orthostatic intolerance. This highlights the potential need for a reevaluation of the diagnostic criteria for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome in younger individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; autonomic nervous system diseases; diagnosis; orthostatic intolerance; postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23766503     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00292.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  6 in total

1.  A prospective study of excessive postural heart rate change on head-up tilt.

Authors:  James C Corkal; Kurt Kimpinski
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.435

2.  QTc interval-dependent body posture in pediatrics.

Authors:  Björn Reynisson; Gustaf Tanghöj; Estelle Naumburg
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome in patients of orthostatic intolerance symptoms: an ambispective study.

Authors:  Dinesh Chouksey; Pankaj Rathi; Ajoy Sodani; Rahul Jain; Hashash Singh Ishar
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-08

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of the response to the brief tachycardia provoked by standing in children suspected for long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Arja S Vink; Ben J M Hermans; Joana Pimenta; Puck J Peltenburg; Luc H P M Filippini; Nynke Hofman; Sally-Ann B Clur; Nico A Blom; Arthur A M Wilde; Tammo Delhaas; Pieter G Postema
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-03-13

Review 5.  Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS): A critical assessment.

Authors:  Brian Olshansky; David Cannom; Artur Fedorowski; Julian Stewart; Christopher Gibbons; Richard Sutton; Win-Kuang Shen; James Muldowney; Tae Hwan Chung; Suzy Feigofsky; Hemal Nayak; Hugh Calkins; David G Benditt
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 11.278

6.  Patients with Orthostatic Intolerance: Relationship to Autonomic Function Tests results and Reproducibility of Symptoms on Tilt.

Authors:  Hyung Lee; Phillip A Low; Hyun Ah Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.