Literature DB >> 23765043

Some perspectives on the risks and benefits of biological control of invasive alien plants in the management of natural ecosystems.

B W van Wilgen1, V C Moran, J H Hoffmann.   

Abstract

Globally, invasions by alien plants are rapidly increasing in extent and severity, leading to large-scale ecosystem degradation. Weed biological control offers opportunities to arrest or even reverse these trends and, although it is not always effective or appropriate as a management strategy, this practice has an excellent record of safety and many notable successes over two centuries. In recent years, growing concerns about the potential for unintended, non-target damage by biological control agents, and fears about other unpredictable effects on ecosystems, have created an increasingly demanding risk-averse regulatory environment. This development may be counter-productive because it tends to overemphasize potential problems and ignores or underestimates the benefits of weed biological control; it offers no viable alternatives; and it overlooks the inherent risks of a decision not to use biological control. The restoration of badly degraded ecosystems to a former pristine condition is not a realistic objective, but the protection of un-invaded or partial restoration of invaded ecosystems can be achieved safely, at low cost and sustainably through the informed and responsible application of biological control. This practice should therefore be given due consideration when management of invasive alien plants is being planned. This discussion paper provides a perspective on the risks and benefits of classical weed biological control, and it is aimed at assisting environmental managers in their deliberations on whether or not to use this strategy in preference, or as a supplement to other alien invasive plant control practices.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23765043     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0099-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nontarget effects--the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions.

Authors:  S M Louda; R W Pemberton; M T Johnson; P A Follett
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Biological control of weeds.

Authors:  R E McFadyen
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Predictable risk to native plants in weed biological control.

Authors:  Robert W Pemberton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Successful Biological Control of Ragwort, Senecio Jacobaea, by Introduced Insects in Oregon.

Authors:  Peter McEvoy; Caroline Cox; Eric Coombs
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Which factors affect the success or failure of eradication campaigns against alien species?

Authors:  Therese Pluess; Vojtěch Jarošík; Petr Pyšek; Ray Cannon; Jan Pergl; Annemarie Breukers; Sven Bacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Review on Invasive Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle) Conflicting Values: Assessment of Its Ecosystem Services and Potential Biological Threat.

Authors:  Barbara Sladonja; Marta Sušek; Julia Guillermic
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 3.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.