BACKGROUND: In the past several years, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been reported regarding the efficacy of treadmill-based walking-specific rehabilitation programs, either individually (TT) or combined with body weight support (BWSTT), over control group therapies poststroke. No clear consensus exists as to whether treadmill-based interventions are superior in rehabilitating walking speed (WS) poststroke. OBJECTIVE: To review published RCTs examining TT and BWSTT poststroke and describe the effects on improving and retaining WS. METHODS: A systematic literature search in computerized databases was conducted to identify RCTs whose methodological quality was assessed with PEDro. Pre- and post-WS, change in WS, functional outcomes, and follow-up speed were extracted and calculated from each study. Additionally, statistical results of each study were examined, and the intragroup and intergroup effect sizes (ESintra and ESinter, respectively) were calculated. RESULTS: All studies (8 TT; 7 BWSTT) met the inclusion criteria, and their methodological quality was generally good, with a mean PEDro score 6.9/10. Of the 15 studies, 8 studies (4 TT; 4 BWSTT) reported intragroup significant increases of WS, whereas only 4 (4 TT) found superiority of treadmill interventions. Nine studies demonstrated large ESintra (4 TT; 5 BWSTT), yet only 3 showed large ESinter (1 TT; 2 BWSTT). Four studies (2 TT and 2 BWSTT) reported retention of gains in WS, regardless of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Treadmill-based interventions poststroke may increase and retain WS, but their universal superiority to other control group therapies has failed to be established.
BACKGROUND: In the past several years, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been reported regarding the efficacy of treadmill-based walking-specific rehabilitation programs, either individually (TT) or combined with body weight support (BWSTT), over control group therapies poststroke. No clear consensus exists as to whether treadmill-based interventions are superior in rehabilitating walking speed (WS) poststroke. OBJECTIVE: To review published RCTs examining TT and BWSTT poststroke and describe the effects on improving and retaining WS. METHODS: A systematic literature search in computerized databases was conducted to identify RCTs whose methodological quality was assessed with PEDro. Pre- and post-WS, change in WS, functional outcomes, and follow-up speed were extracted and calculated from each study. Additionally, statistical results of each study were examined, and the intragroup and intergroup effect sizes (ESintra and ESinter, respectively) were calculated. RESULTS: All studies (8 TT; 7 BWSTT) met the inclusion criteria, and their methodological quality was generally good, with a mean PEDro score 6.9/10. Of the 15 studies, 8 studies (4 TT; 4 BWSTT) reported intragroup significant increases of WS, whereas only 4 (4 TT) found superiority of treadmill interventions. Nine studies demonstrated large ESintra (4 TT; 5 BWSTT), yet only 3 showed large ESinter (1 TT; 2 BWSTT). Four studies (2 TT and 2 BWSTT) reported retention of gains in WS, regardless of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Treadmill-based interventions poststroke may increase and retain WS, but their universal superiority to other control group therapies has failed to be established.
Authors: L Nilsson; J Carlsson; A Danielsson; A Fugl-Meyer; K Hellström; L Kristensen; B Sjölund; K S Sunnerhagen; G Grimby Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Inácio Teixeira da Cunha; Peter A Lim; Huma Qureshy; Helene Henson; Trilok Monga; Elizabeth J Protas Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: David H Saunders; Mark Sanderson; Sara Hayes; Maeve Kilrane; Carolyn A Greig; Miriam Brazzelli; Gillian E Mead Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-03-24
Authors: Katlin Genthe; Christopher Schenck; Steven Eicholtz; Laura Zajac-Cox; Steven Wolf; Trisha M Kesar Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Francesco Lacquaniti; Yury P Ivanenko; Francesca Sylos-Labini; Valentina La Scaleia; Barbara La Scaleia; Patrick A Willems; Myrka Zago Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Ken-Wei Chang; Chih-Ming Lin; Chen-Wen Yen; Chia-Chi Yang; Toshiaki Tanaka; Lan-Yuen Guo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.390