Literature DB >> 23764726

Evaluation of the intervertebral disk angle for the assessment of anterior cervical diskoligamentous injury.

L M Alhilali1, S Fakhran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The anterior diskoligamentous complex is important for cervical spinal stability. Subjective widening of the disk space after trauma has been used to gauge disruption of the anterior diskoligamentous complex on CT scanning, but no quantitative CT measurements exist to evaluate injury. The purpose of our study was to evaluate if an increased intervertebral disk angle could serve as a more sensitive, reproducible indicator of disruption of the anterior diskoligamentous complex compared with subjective assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intervertebral disk angle was retrospectively measured on CT scanning for 122 disk levels with disruption of the anterior diskoligamentous complex by MR imaging and 1095 disk levels with an intact anterior diskoligamentous complex by MR imaging. The intervertebral disk angle was measured between the anterior superior endplate and anterior inferior endplate, with angle apex at the midposterior disk. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for subjective disk widening and specific angle values were obtained. Intervertebral disk angle reproducibility was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Intervertebral disk angle measurements were "substantially reproducible." No disk with an intact anterior diskoligamentous complex had an intervertebral disk angle greater than 18° or 2 standard deviations from the average intervertebral disk angle of the remaining disks. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for a criterion of subjective disk widening was 0.58. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for objective criteria, an intervertebral disk angle greater than 13 or above 1 standard deviation from normal values, was 0.85. The maximal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was achieved if an intervertebral disk angle greater than 2 SD from the average angle of the other disks was used (0.86).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective disk widening does not accurately detect disruption of the anterior diskoligamentous complex on CT scanning; an elevated intervertebral disk angle provides a more sensitive and objective measurement to help direct further imaging in trauma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23764726      PMCID: PMC7965216          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  26 in total

1.  Do flexion extension plain films facilitate treatment after trauma?

Authors:  Therèse M Duane; Nicholas Scarcella; Justin Cross; Luke G Wolfe; Julie Mayglothling; Michel B Aboutanos; James F Whelan; Ajai K Malhotra; Rao R Ivatury
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients.

Authors:  N E Hawass
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Acute cervical spine injuries: prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center.

Authors:  R W Katzberg; P F Benedetti; C M Drake; M Ivanovic; R A Levine; C S Beatty; W R Nemzek; R A McFall; F K Ontell; D M Bishop; V C Poirier; B W Chong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging in alert, neurologically intact trauma patients with persistent midline tenderness and negative computed tomography results.

Authors:  Helen M Ackland; Peter A Cameron; Dinesh K Varma; Gregory J Fitt; D James Cooper; Rory Wolfe; Gregory M Malham; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Owen D Williamson; Susan M Liew
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma.

Authors:  Stephen C Gale; Vicente H Gracias; Patrick M Reilly; C William Schwab
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-11

7.  Correlation of MR imaging findings with intraoperative findings after cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  D Goradia; K F Linnau; W A Cohen; S Mirza; D K Hallam; C C Blackmore
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine 4: major injuries.

Authors:  Joseph F Cusick; Narayan Yoganandan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Acute cervical spine trauma: evaluation with 1.5-T MR imaging.

Authors:  S E Mirvis; F H Geisler; J J Jelinek; J N Joslyn; F Gellad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Normal thickness and appearance of the prevertebral soft tissues on multidetector CT.

Authors:  C A Rojas; D Vermess; J C Bertozzi; J Whitlow; C Guidi; C R Martinez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.