Literature DB >> 23764693

The effect of work location on urolithiasis in health care professionals.

Brian J Linder1, Laureano J Rangel, Amy E Krambeck.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the prevalence and risks factors for urolithiasis among health care professionals who work in the operating room (OR) versus other locations. Electronic surveys, focusing on a history of urolithiasis, were sent to 3,921 randomly selected employees at our institution, 34 % (1,340) of which worked in an OR. Additional information regarding potential risk factors such as quantity of daily fluid intake, stress level, activity level, body mass index, relevant medical conditions and family history of urolithiasis were obtained and analyzed. Of those surveyed, 46 % (1,802/3,921) responded. The prevalence of urolithiasis for all responders was 10.9 % (196/1,802). Those individuals working in an OR had a higher prevalence of stone disease compared to those who work elsewhere [14.6 % (64/439) versus 9.7 % (132/1,363); p = 0.004]. Specifically, physicians that work in an OR had the highest prevalence of urolithiasis [17.4 % (20/115) versus 9.7 % (132/1,363); p = 0.009). Additionally, physicians that work in an OR reported significantly less fluid intake (p = 0.04) and higher stress levels (p < 0.0001) compared to employees not working in an OR. On multivariate analysis, working in an OR remained associated with a significantly increased risk stone formation (HR 1.43; p = 0.04). Our survey found that health care professionals working in an OR setting, and physicians in particular, are at higher risk of urolithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23764693     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0579-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  21 in total

1.  The Canadian Medical Association's Policy on Physician Health and Well-being.

Authors:  D Puddester
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-01

Review 2.  Psychosocial challenges facing physicians of today.

Authors:  B B Arnetz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Dietary therapy in idiopathic nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Loris Borghi; Tiziana Meschi; Umberto Maggiore; Beatrice Prati
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Urinary tract stone disease in the United States veteran population. II. Geographical analysis of variations in composition.

Authors:  N S Mandel; G S Mandel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Urolithiasis. A study of its frequency.

Authors:  A Norlin; B Lindell; P O Granberg; N Lindvall
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

6.  Hot occupation and nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  L Borghi; T Meschi; F Amato; A Novarini; A Romanelli; F Cigala
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community.

Authors:  G Godin; R J Shephard
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1985-09

8.  The frequency of urolithiasis in hospital discharge diagnoses in the United States.

Authors:  R Sierakowski; B Finlayson; R R Landes; C D Finlayson; N Sierakowski
Journal:  Invest Urol       Date:  1978-05

9.  Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones.

Authors:  Eric N Taylor; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Urolithiasis--an interdisciplinary diagnostic, therapeutic and secondary preventive challenge.

Authors:  Christian Fisang; Ralf Anding; Stefan C Müller; Stefan Latz; Norbert Laube
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  [Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for urolithiasis].

Authors:  F Praus; M Schönthaler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Treatment effect, adherence, and safety of high fluid intake for the prevention of incident and recurrent kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Sandro Rossetti; Keith Friend; Stephen B Erickson; John C Lieske
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 4.  The exposome for kidney stones.

Authors:  David S Goldfarb
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Urolithiasis risk: a comparison between healthcare providers and the general population.

Authors:  Ming-Hung Chen; Shih-Feng Weng; Chien-Chin Hsu; Hung-Jung Lin; Shih-Bin Su; Jhi-Joung Wang; How-Ran Guo; Chien-Cheng Huang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Nutrition and Kidney Stone Disease.

Authors:  Roswitha Siener
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Medical therapy for nephrolithiasis: State of the art.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-09-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.