Literature DB >> 23763918

Expectations of serious adverse events at the end of life of patients with acute myeloid leukemia who receive salvage therapy.

Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas1, Farhad Ravandi-Kashani, Jorge E Cortes, Elias Jabbour, Stefan Faderl, Sherry A Pierce, Hagop Kantarjian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with AML and refractory disease receive investigational therapies within 2 months of their death. The attribution of serious AEs in this phase to disease progression vs. drug toxicity is tenuous. We aimed to determine the incidence of serious AEs in the last 2 weeks of life of patients with refractory-relapsed AML undergoing salvage therapy (ST). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults who received ST from September 2010 to December 2011 were evaluated. Data collected included incidence of serious AEs, type of ST, medical complications, length of hospital stay, and Intensive Care Unit stays, organ dysfunctions, and use of life support therapies.
RESULTS: A total of 122 patients received ST. Most 64 patients (52%) received intensive chemotherapy; 39 patients (32%) had single investigational drug therapies, and 19 patients (16%) received therapy with hypomethylating agents. Common complications were pneumonia (82%), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy 72 patients (59%), and septic shock 60 patients (49%). Notable complications included: acute respiratory failure justifying invasive mechanical ventilation in 60 patients (42%), renal failure requiring dialysis in 33 patients (27%), atrial fibrillation in 37 patients (30%), and prolonged prothrombin time (grade 3) in 68 patients (56%). There was no difference in the incidence of these complications by type of ST.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline expectations of serious AEs at the end of life of patients with AML undergoing ST were established. The AE profiles of new investigational interventions or therapies could be compared with what would be expected in such circumstances from the combined effect of disease progression, expected complications of the AML therapy, and therapies delivered in previous historical contexts. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse effects; Cancer chemotherapy agents; Drug toxicities; Leukemias; Terminally ill

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23763918      PMCID: PMC4341913          DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2013.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  7 in total

1.  Characteristics and outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia refractory to 1 cycle of high-dose cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Farhad Ravandi; Jorge Cortes; Stefan Faderl; Susan O'Brien; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Srdan Verstovsek; Fabio P S Santos; Jianqin Shan; Mark Brandt; Marcos de Lima; Sherry Pierce; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Shortcomings in the clinical evaluation of new drugs: acute myeloid leukemia as paradigm.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Frederick R Appelbaum; Martin S Tallman; Noel S Weiss; Richard A Larson; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of induction treatments in acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly.

Authors:  Dimitrios C Ziogas; Michael Voulgarelis; Elias Zintzaras
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Acute leukemia incidence and patient survival among children and adults in the United States, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Graça M Dores; Susan S Devesa; Rochelle E Curtis; Martha S Linet; Lindsay M Morton
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Treatment for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: what is new?

Authors:  Yishai Ofran; Jacob M Rowe
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.284

7.  90-Days mortality rate in patients treated within the context of a phase-I trial: how should we identify patients who should not go on trial?

Authors:  Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau; David Olmos; Joo Ern Ang; Jorge Barriuso; Vasilios Karavasilis; Sue Ashley; Johann de Bono; Ian Judson; Stan Kaye
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 9.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.