Literature DB >> 18550361

90-Days mortality rate in patients treated within the context of a phase-I trial: how should we identify patients who should not go on trial?

Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau1, David Olmos, Joo Ern Ang, Jorge Barriuso, Vasilios Karavasilis, Sue Ashley, Johann de Bono, Ian Judson, Stan Kaye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary objectives of phase-I trials include the definition of drug toxicities and the recommendation of phase-II doses. In order to safeguard the well-being of its participants, a common inclusion criterion is that of life expectancy >3 months. However, previous studies have shown that about 20% of these patients do not survive beyond this time-point.
METHODS: We identified 97 patients who died within the first 90 days of treatment out of a total of 654 consecutively treated phase-I patients, from June 2003 to June 2007. This cohort was compared to a control group comprising 215 patients who lived >90 days on phase-I studies and were treated from January 2005 to June 2006.
RESULTS: In keeping with our recently reported phase-I survival risk score, multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients who died within the first 90 days had lower albumin (p=0.010), greater number of metastatic sites (p=0.00001) and higher frequency of elevated LDH (p=0.0002). This analysis also showed that 86% of patients who died during the first 90 days had an increased risk score of 2/3 compared to 39% in the control group. Furthermore, three additional factors were identified, namely younger age (p=0.024), higher white cell count (p=0.028) and poorer ECOG PS (p=0.012) but the addition of these did not improve the ability to predict 90-day mortality compared to the afore-mentioned risk score.
CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence that our easily derivable scoring system provides an objective method to identify patients with a very limited life expectancy in whom participation in phase-I trials should be carefully evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18550361     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  20 in total

1.  Cell-free Circulating Tumor DNA Variant Allele Frequency Associates with Survival in Metastatic Cancer.

Authors:  Seyed Pairawan; Kenneth R Hess; Filip Janku; Nora S Sanchez; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Cathy Eng; Senthilkumar Damodaran; Milind Javle; Ahmed O Kaseb; David S Hong; Vivek Subbiah; Siqing Fu; David R Fogelman; Victoria M Raymond; Richard B Lanman; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The role of age on dose-limiting toxicities in phase I dose-escalation trials.

Authors:  A Schwandt; P J Harris; S Hunsberger; A Deleporte; G L Smith; D Vulih; B D Anderson; S P Ivy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Nomogram to predict cycle-one serious drug-related toxicity in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  David M Hyman; Anne A Eaton; Mrinal M Gounder; Gary L Smith; Erika G Pamer; Martee L Hensley; David R Spriggs; Percy Ivy; Alexia Iasonos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Survival outcome and prognostic model of patients with colorectal cancer on phase 1 trials.

Authors:  Audrey E Kam; Gopichand Pendurti; Umang H Shah; Mohammad H Ghalib; Imran Chaudhary; Jennifer Chuy; Lakshmi Rajdev; Andreas Kaubisch; Santiago Aparo; Ioannis Mantzaris; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Limited impact of palliative chemotherapy on survival in advanced solid tumours in patients with poor performance status.

Authors:  Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz; Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz; María Isabel Sáez; José Manuel Trigo; M Mar Galindo; Lourdes Manzaneque; Begoña Jiménez; Begoña Muros; Emilio Alba
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Survival of 1,181 patients in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience.

Authors:  Jennifer Wheler; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David Hong; Aung Naing; Gerald Falchook; Sarina Piha-Paul; Siqing Fu; Stacy Moulder; Bettzy Stephen; Sijin Wen; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Evaluation of patient enrollment in oncology phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Diane A J van der Biessen; Merlijn A Cranendonk; Gaia Schiavon; Bronno van der Holt; Erik A C Wiemer; Ferry A L M Eskens; Jaap Verweij; Maja J A de Jonge; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-02-21

8.  Evaluation of the Safety and Benefit of Phase I Oncology Trials for Patients With Primary CNS Tumors.

Authors:  Mrinal M Gounder; Lakshmi Nayak; Solmaz Sahebjam; Alona Muzikansky; Armando J Sanchez; Serena Desideri; Xiaobu Ye; S Percy Ivy; L Burt Nabors; Michael Prados; Stuart Grossman; Lisa M DeAngelis; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A retrospective analysis of clinical outcome of patients with chemo-refractory metastatic breast cancer treated in a single institution phase I unit.

Authors:  A T Brunetto; D Sarker; D Papadatos-Pastos; R Fehrmann; S B Kaye; S Johnston; M Allen; J S De Bono; C Swanton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Expectations of serious adverse events at the end of life of patients with acute myeloid leukemia who receive salvage therapy.

Authors:  Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas; Farhad Ravandi-Kashani; Jorge E Cortes; Elias Jabbour; Stefan Faderl; Sherry A Pierce; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2013-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.