OBJECTIVES: We compared participant characteristics and abstinence outcomes of smokers who chose in-person or telephone tobacco dependence treatment. METHODS: We provided the same treatment content to 7267 smokers in Arkansas between 2005 and 2008 who self-selected treatment modality; examined demographic, clinical, environmental, and treatment utilization differences between modalities; and modeled outcomes and participants' choice of modality with logistic regression. RESULTS: At end of treatment, in-person participants were more likely to be abstinent than telephone participants, and smokers of higher socioeconomic status (SES) were more likely to be abstinent with telephone treatment than lower-SES smokers. Long term, modality had no effect on treatment outcomes. Higher-SES smokers and smokers exposed to more treatment content were more likely to achieve long-term abstinence, regardless of modality. Men and more recalcitrant smokers were more likely to choose in-person treatment; lower-SES, ethnic minority, and more dependent smokers were more likely to choose telephone treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment modality attracts different groups of smokers, but has no effect on long-term abstinence. Multiple treatment modalities are needed to provide treatment to a heterogeneous population of smokers. More research is needed to understand the influences on treatment choice.
OBJECTIVES: We compared participant characteristics and abstinence outcomes of smokers who chose in-person or telephone tobacco dependence treatment. METHODS: We provided the same treatment content to 7267 smokers in Arkansas between 2005 and 2008 who self-selected treatment modality; examined demographic, clinical, environmental, and treatment utilization differences between modalities; and modeled outcomes and participants' choice of modality with logistic regression. RESULTS: At end of treatment, in-personparticipants were more likely to be abstinent than telephone participants, and smokers of higher socioeconomic status (SES) were more likely to be abstinent with telephone treatment than lower-SES smokers. Long term, modality had no effect on treatment outcomes. Higher-SES smokers and smokers exposed to more treatment content were more likely to achieve long-term abstinence, regardless of modality. Men and more recalcitrant smokers were more likely to choose in-person treatment; lower-SES, ethnic minority, and more dependent smokers were more likely to choose telephone treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment modality attracts different groups of smokers, but has no effect on long-term abstinence. Multiple treatment modalities are needed to provide treatment to a heterogeneous population of smokers. More research is needed to understand the influences on treatment choice.
Authors: Dennis R Trinidad; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Martha M White; Sherry L Emery; Karen Messer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jessica L Reid; David Hammond; Christian Boudreau; Geoffrey T Fong; Mohammad Siahpush Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Danielle E McCarthy; Thomas M Piasecki; Douglas E Jorenby; Daniel L Lawrence; Saul Shiffman; Timothy B Baker Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Mignonne C Guy; Ryan G N Seltzer; Michael Cameron; Juliana Pugmire; Stephen Michael; Scott J Leischow Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2012-01
Authors: Lawrence C An; Anne Betzner; Barbara Schillo; Michael G Luxenberg; Matthew Christenson; Ann Wendling; Jessie E Saul; Annette Kavanaugh Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Christine E Sheffer; Maxine Stitzer; Thomas J Payne; Bradford W Applegate; David Bourne; J Gary Wheeler Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2009 May-Jun
Authors: Shenell D Evans; Christine E Sheffer; Warren K Bickel; Naomi Cottoms; Mary Olson; Luana Panissidi Pitì; Tekeshia Austin; Helen Stayna Journal: J Addict Res Ther Date: 2015-03-20
Authors: Christine E Sheffer; Warren K Bickel; Christopher T Franck; Luana Panissidi; Jami C Pittman; Helen Stayna; Shenell Evans Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Christine E Sheffer; Darren R Christensen; Reid Landes; Larry P Carter; Lisa Jackson; Warren K Bickel Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Lorna Sampson; Janet Papadakos; Victoria Milne; Lisa W Le; Geoffrey Liu; Nazek Abdelmutti; Robin Milne; David P Goldstein; Lawson Eng; Meredith Giuliani Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Bárbara Piñeiro; David W Wetter; Damon J Vidrine; Diana S Hoover; Summer G Frank-Pearce; Nga Nguyen; Susan M Zbikowski; Mary B Williams; Jennifer I Vidrine Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2019-01-17