BACKGROUND: Neurofilaments are promising biomarkers in multiple sclerosis (MS) and increased levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indicate axonal damage or degeneration. In a previous study, neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in CSF of relapsing remitting (RR) patients with MS were normalized by natalizumab treatment. AIMS OF THE STUDY: We compared the coherence between NfL and neurofilament heavy chain (NfH(SMI) (35) ) levels in longitudinal CSF samples in a subset of these patients. METHODS: In 30 patients with RRMS, CSF was obtained prior to and following 12 months of natalizumab treatment. NfH(SMI) (35) was measured by an electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay. NfL levels were determined previously by the UmanDiagnostics NF-light(®) assay. RESULTS: NfH(SMI) (35) decreased in 73.3% and NfL in 90% of the patients following natalizumab treatment (32.4 vs 27.4 pg/ml, P = 0.002 and 820 vs 375 pg/ml, P < 0.0001). Patients experiencing a relapse showed higher NfH(SMI) (35) levels compared with patients in remission (47.7 vs 27.6 pg/ml, n = 8, P = 0.001). This difference was less obvious for NfL (1055 vs 725 pg/ml, P = 0.256). In patients in remission, NfL levels were lower following natalizumab treatment (830 vs 365 pg/ml, n = 20, P = 0.0002), whereas the same comparison failed significance for NfH(SMI) (35) (28.3 vs 26.9 pg/ml, P = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm previous findings, indicating reduced axonal damage under natalizumab treatment by measuring NfH(SMI) (35) , using an assay with independent methodology. In comparison with NfH(SMI) (35) , NfL changes were more pronounced and the treatment effect also included patients in remission. Our results suggest that NfL is superior over NfH(SMI) (35) as therapeutic biomarker and is a promising candidate to measure neuroaxonal damage in MS treatment trials.
BACKGROUND: Neurofilaments are promising biomarkers in multiple sclerosis (MS) and increased levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indicate axonal damage or degeneration. In a previous study, neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in CSF of relapsing remitting (RR) patients with MS were normalized by natalizumab treatment. AIMS OF THE STUDY: We compared the coherence between NfL and neurofilament heavy chain (NfH(SMI) (35) ) levels in longitudinal CSF samples in a subset of these patients. METHODS: In 30 patients with RRMS, CSF was obtained prior to and following 12 months of natalizumab treatment. NfH(SMI) (35) was measured by an electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay. NfL levels were determined previously by the UmanDiagnostics NF-light(®) assay. RESULTS:NfH(SMI) (35) decreased in 73.3% and NfL in 90% of the patients following natalizumab treatment (32.4 vs 27.4 pg/ml, P = 0.002 and 820 vs 375 pg/ml, P < 0.0001). Patients experiencing a relapse showed higher NfH(SMI) (35) levels compared with patients in remission (47.7 vs 27.6 pg/ml, n = 8, P = 0.001). This difference was less obvious for NfL (1055 vs 725 pg/ml, P = 0.256). In patients in remission, NfL levels were lower following natalizumab treatment (830 vs 365 pg/ml, n = 20, P = 0.0002), whereas the same comparison failed significance for NfH(SMI) (35) (28.3 vs 26.9 pg/ml, P = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm previous findings, indicating reduced axonal damage under natalizumab treatment by measuring NfH(SMI) (35) , using an assay with independent methodology. In comparison with NfH(SMI) (35) , NfL changes were more pronounced and the treatment effect also included patients in remission. Our results suggest that NfL is superior over NfH(SMI) (35) as therapeutic biomarker and is a promising candidate to measure neuroaxonal damage in MS treatment trials.
Authors: C H Hulme; S J Brown; H R Fuller; J Riddell; A Osman; J Chowdhury; N Kumar; W E Johnson; K T Wright Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Alessandro Trentini; Manuel Comabella; Mar Tintoré; Marleen J A Koel-Simmelink; Joep Killestein; Birthe Roos; Alex Rovira; Carsten Korth; Philipp Ottis; Marinus A Blankenstein; Xavier Montalban; Tiziana Bellini; Charlotte E Teunissen Journal: J Neurol Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Kelly Hares; K Kemp; S Loveless; C M Rice; N Scolding; E Tallantyre; N Robertson; A Wilkins Journal: J Neurol Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Arie R Gafson; Nicolas R Barthélemy; Pascale Bomont; Roxana O Carare; Heather D Durham; Jean-Pierre Julien; Jens Kuhle; David Leppert; Ralph A Nixon; Roy O Weller; Henrik Zetterberg; Paul M Matthews Journal: Brain Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Zara A Ioannides; Peter A Csurhes; Andrew Swayne; Philippe Foubert; Blake T Aftab; Michael P Pender Journal: Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Date: 2021-06-03