| Literature DB >> 23762599 |
Abstract
The present study was done to evaluate the antiurolithiatic activity of ethanolic extract of roots (ELC 200 mg/kg) and oleanolic acid (OA 60 mg/kg, O.A. 80 mg/kg, O.A. 100 mg/kg) isolated from roots of Lantana camara in albino wistar male rats using zinc disc implantation induced urolithiatic model. The group in which only zinc disc was implanted without any treatment showed increase in calcium output (23 ± 2.7 mg/dL). Cystone receiving animals showed significant protection from such change (P < 0.01). Treatment with OA and ELC significantly reduced the calcium output at a dose of OA 60 mg/kg (P < 0.01), OA 80 mg/kg (P < 0.01), ELC 200 mg/kg (P < 0.01), and OA 100 mg/kg (P < 0.001), as compared with zinc disc implanted group. The average weight of zinc discs along with the deposited crystals in the only disc implanted group was found to be 111 ± 8.6 mg. Group that received Cystone 500 mg/kg showed significant reduction in the depositions (P < 0.001). Similarly, the rats which received OA and ELC showed reduced formation of depositions around the zinc disc (P < 0.001). The X-ray images of rats also showed significant effect of OA and ELC on urolitiasis. Thus, OA and ELC showed promising antiurolithiatic activity in dose dependant manner.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23762599 PMCID: PMC3666204 DOI: 10.1155/2013/951795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Pharmacol ISSN: 2090-5165
Effect of oleanolic acid and ELC on zinc implantation model.
| Serial number | Groups | Urine output (mL) | Urinary calcium output (mg/dL) | Weight of calculi (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | Control | 2.6 ± 0.2 | — | — |
| (2) | Sham Control | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 10 ± 3.1** | — |
| (3) | Disc Implanted | 1.6 ± 0.1* | 23 ± 2.7 | 111 ± 8.6 |
| (4) | Cystone 500 mg/kg | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 12 ± 2.7** | 6.7 ± 2.9*** |
| (5) | OA 60 mg/kg | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 12 ± 0.7** | 11 ± 2.4*** |
| (6) | OA 80 mg/kg | 2 ± 0.2 | 10 ± 2** | 11 ± 1.9*** |
| (7) | OA 100 mg/kg | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 8.4 ± 1.8** | 4.1 ± 1.3*** |
| (8) | ELC 200 mg/kg | 2.4 ± 05 | 11 ± 1.2*** | 13 ± 1.7*** |
Value represents; mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, as compared with naive control, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 as compared with disc implanted group.
Figure 1X-ray of image of rats in zinc disc implantation model of urolithiasis. (a) Control, (b) zinc disc implanted, (c) Cystone treated, (d) OA 60 mg/kg, (e) OA 80 mg/kg, (f) OA 100 mg/kg, and (g) ELC 200 mg/kg.