| Literature DB >> 23762503 |
Mary Heskel1, Heather Greaves, Ari Kornfeld, Laura Gough, Owen K Atkin, Matthew H Turnbull, Gaius Shaver, Kevin L Griffin.
Abstract
Direct and indirect effects of warming are increasingly modifying the carbon-rich vegetation and soils of the Arctic tundra, with important implications for the terrestrial carbon cycle. Understanding the biological and environmental influences on the processes that regulate foliar carbon cycling in tundra species is essential for predicting the future terrestrial carbon balance in this region. To determine the effect of climate change impacts on gas exchange in tundra, we quantified foliar photosynthesis (A net), respiration in the dark and light (R D and R L, determined using the Kok method), photorespiration (PR), carbon gain efficiency (CGE, the ratio of photosynthetic CO2 uptake to total CO2 exchange of photosynthesis, PR, and respiration), and leaf traits of three dominant species - Betula nana, a woody shrub; Eriophorum vaginatum, a graminoid; and Rubus chamaemorus, a forb - grown under long-term warming and fertilization treatments since 1989 at Toolik Lake, Alaska. Under warming, B. nana exhibited the highest rates of A net and strongest light inhibition of respiration, increasing CGE nearly 50% compared with leaves grown in ambient conditions, which corresponded to a 52% increase in relative abundance. Gas exchange did not shift under fertilization in B. nana despite increases in leaf N and P and near-complete dominance at the community scale, suggesting a morphological rather than physiological response. Rubus chamaemorus, exhibited minimal shifts in foliar gas exchange, and responded similarly to B. nana under treatment conditions. By contrast, E. vaginatum, did not significantly alter its gas exchange physiology under treatments and exhibited dramatic decreases in relative cover (warming: -19.7%; fertilization: -79.7%; warming with fertilization: -91.1%). Our findings suggest a foliar physiological advantage in the woody shrub B. nana that is further mediated by warming and increased soil nutrient availability, which may facilitate shrub expansion and in turn alter the terrestrial carbon cycle in future tundra environments.Entities:
Keywords: Betula nana nana; Eriophorum vaginatum; Kok effect; Rubus chamaemorus; carbon gain efficiency; photosynthesis; respiration; tundra shrub encroachment
Year: 2013 PMID: 23762503 PMCID: PMC3678471 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Foliar element concentrations and ratios of the three study species grown under control and treatment conditions
| N (mmol/g) | P (μmol/g) | C:N | N:P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | 1.92 ± 0.03a | 98.5 ± 5.5 | 17.78 ± 0.33a | 19.58 ± 0.79a | |
| GH | 1.94 ± 0.09a | 106.5 ± 3.2 | 17.35 ± 0.57a | 18.30 ± 1.20a | |
| NP | 2.51 ± 0.16b | 200.2 ± 7.4bc | 13.23 ± 0.63b | 12.58 ± 0.65b | |
| GHNP | 2.03 ± 0.10a | 158.2 ± 2.9b | 17.14 ± 0.85a | 12.82 ± 0.74b | |
| CT | 1.69 ± 0.09a | 85.3 ± 2.3a | 20.08 ± 1.11a | 19.85 ± 1.06a | |
| GH | 1.62 ± 0.05a | 92.3 ± 1.5a | 20.35 ± 0.54a | 17.64 ± 0.38ab | |
| NP | 2.10 ± 0.05b | 126.8 ± 3.7b | 15.73 ± 0.33b | 16.78 ± 0.79ab | |
| GHNP | 1.85 ± 0.05a | 143.7 ± 6.5bc | 17.75 ± 0.54a | 12.97 ± 0.69b | |
| CT | 2.11 ± 0.11a | 138.8 ± 11.0a | 15.51 ± 0.84a | 15.79 ± 1.23a | |
| GH | 2.06 ± 0.08a | 118.5 ± 3.8a | 15.49 ± 0.55a | 17.53 ± 0.93a | |
| NP | 2.44 ± 0.12a | 200.2 ± 1.2b | 13.27 ± 0.76a | 12.24 ± 0.66a | |
| GHNP | 2.05 ± 0.11a | 126.4 ± 22.2a | 15.79 ± 0.86a | 17.92 ± 1.98a |
N and P values represent mmol/g of leaf area, and N:P is a ratio of those values, however, C:N represents a ratio of the percent of dry leaf matter for both elements. N = 7–9 for N, C:N, and n = 4 for P and N:P. Means ± SE are presented, and statistical significance (P < 0.05) is denoted alphabetically within species.
Foliar photosynthesis, photorespiration for the three species under control and treatments (n = 7–10)
| PR (μmol/m2 per sec) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT1 | GH1 | NP1 | GHNP1 | CT1 | GH1 | NP1 | GHNP2 | |
| 16.99 ± 1.50b | 16.95 ± 1.38b | 13.92 ± 1.63a | 13.22 ± 1.64a | 1.46 ± 0.16a | 1.28 ± 0.12b | 0.93 ± 0.11a | 1.33 ± 0.20a | |
| 10.02 ± 1.49a | 6.20 ± 0.99a | 11.75 ± 1.38a | 9.67 ± 1.16a | 0.99 ± 0.16a | 0.51 ± 0.08 a | 0.93 ± 0.12a | 1.68 ± 0.45a | |
| 12.24 ± 0.80ab | 11.65 ± 0.91ab | 13.14 ± 1.22a | 13.98 ± 1.05a | 1.02 ± 0.09a | 1.08 ± 0.10ab | 1.24 ± 0.11a | 1.59 ± 0.18a | |
Values are expressed on an area basis and represent means ± SE; significance was tested for species, warming, and fertilization effect by three-way ANOVA. Species that do not share a capital letter, growth conditions that do not share a number, and individual means that do not share a lowercase letter are significantly different (P > 0.05).
Figure 1Respiration in the dark (shaded) and light (unshaded) and the corresponding inhibition of respiration by light (diagonally striped) in Betula nana (a), Eriophorum vaginatum (b), and Rubus chamaemorus (c). Values represent means ± SE, n = 8 for all variables. Alphabetical notation was not used for clarity.
Figure 2Carbon gain efficiency of Betula nana (diagonal stripe), Eriophorum vaginatum (unshaded), Rubus chamaemorus (lightly shaded) under control conditions and the three treatments (n = 8). Values represent means ± SE; alphabetical notation indicates significance between treatments within a species at P < 0.05.
Results from a two-way MANOVA on the relative abundance of the three focal species, with fertilization (NP) and warming (GH) as factors
| Source | Overall | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | df | |||||||||
| NP | 3, 91 | 204.76 | *** | 1, 93 | 299.95 | *** | 13.36 | *** | 166.22 | *** |
| GH | 3, 91 | 4.03 | ** | 1, 93 | 10.19 | *** | ||||
| NP × GH | 3, 91 | 9.45 | *** | 1, 93 | 11.55 | *** | ||||
MANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance; df, degree of freedom; ns, not significant. F-values were not reported for nonsignificant results.
Degrees of freedom for B. nana F-tests were the same for the other two species.
Stars represent significance as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Relative species cover across treatments (a) and percent change in species cover relative to control plot measurements (b); Betula nana (diagonal stripe), Eriophorum vaginatum (unshaded), Rubus chamaemorus (lightly shaded), and all other measured species were combined (darkly shaded).