The use of thermoresponsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based hydrogel (pNIPAAm) for rapid tuning of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is reported. This approach is implemented by using an SPR layer architecture with an embedded indium tin oxide microheater and pNIPAAm film on its top. It takes advantage of rapid thermally induced swelling and collapse of pNIPAAm that is accompanied by large refractive index changes and leads to high thermo-optical coefficient of dn/dT = 2 × 10-2 RIU/K. We show that this material is excellently suited for efficient control of refractive index-sensitive SPR and that it can serve simultaneously as a 3D binding matrix in biosensor applications (if modified with biomolecular recognition elements for a specific capture of target analyte). We demonstrate that this approach enables modulating of the output signal in surface plasmon-enhanced fluorescence spectroscopy biosensors and holds potential for simple time-multiplexing of sensing channels for parallelized readout of fluorescence assays.
The use of thermoresponsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based hydrogel (pNIPAAm) for rapid tuning of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is reported. This approach is implemented by using an SPR layer architecture with an embedded indium tin oxide microheater and pNIPAAm film on its top. It takes advantage of rapid thermally induced swelling and collapse of pNIPAAm that is accompanied by large refractive index changes and leads to high thermo-optical coefficient of dn/dT = 2 × 10-2 RIU/K. We show that this material is excellently suited for efficient control of refractive index-sensitive SPR and that it can serve simultaneously as a 3D binding matrix in biosensor applications (if modified with biomolecular recognition elements for a specific capture of target analyte). We demonstrate that this approach enables modulating of the output signal in surface plasmon-enhanced fluorescence spectroscopy biosensors and holds potential for simple time-multiplexing of sensing channels for parallelized readout of fluorescence assays.
Plasmonics
represents a rapidly developing research and technology
area that exploits the tight confinement of electromagnetic field
associated with its coupling to surface plasmons–optical waves
originating from collective oscillations of the electron plasma on
surfaces of metallic nanostructures and thin films.[1] Fast and reversible tuning of surface plasmons is crucial
to harness the potential of plasmonics in important areas such as
signal processing, optical sensors, and biosensors. Up to now, the
interfacing of metallic structures with dielectric materials for electro-optical,[2] thermo-optical,[3] magneto-optical,[4] photoinduced,[5] and
electrochemical[6] -based modulating of refractive
index was pursued for rapid tuning of surface plasmon resonance (SPR).
However, these approaches typically allow for only weak refractive
index changes (<10–2 to 10–3)[7] that are not sufficient to control
SPR efficiently.Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)
(pNIPAAm) is an excellently
suited alternative material for active control of SPR in the visible/near-infrared
spectrum. It is a well-characterized thermoresponsive hydrogel with
lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of 32 °C. Below the
LCST, pNIPAAm exhibits a highly open, water-swollen structure, while
above the LCST it collapses with a release of bound water, which leads
to an increase in its density and correspondingly of the refractive
index.[8] Thin pNIPAAm brush layers were
recently reported for tuning of the localized surface plasmon resonance
(LSPR) on arrays of metallic nanoparticles[9] and were applied in surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy.[10] In addition, SPR on planar metallic surfaces
was employed for the investigation of cross-linked pNIPAAm layers.[8,11] In our laboratory, various hydrogel materials derived from pNIPAAm
were developed to serve as an extended 3D binding matrix in refractometric[12,13] and surface plasmon-enhanced fluorescence spectroscopy (SPFS)[14,15] biosensors for detection of trace amounts of molecular analytes.
The equilibrium responsive properties of cross-linked pNIPAAm layers
were extensively studied as a function of slow-temperature variations
depending on the network density, solvent, and polymer backbone modifications.[8,16,17]This paper extends these
studies by investigating the kinetics
of transition between the swollen and the collapsed state and its
dependence on the postmodification by protein molecules. In addition,
the implementation of pNIPAAm thermoresponsive binding matrix for
rapid switching on and off the resonant coupling to surface plasmons
is demonstrated and utilized for modulating of fluorescence signal
in an SPFS biosensor.
Experimental Section
Materials
Sodium para-tetrafluorophenol
sulfonate (TFPS) and 3-(4-benzoylphenoxy)propanethiol
(BP-thiol) were synthesized as described in the literature.[17,18] The Cytop fluoropolymer (CTL-809M) was purchased from Asahi Glass
(Japan). SU-8 and its solvent were obtained from MicroChem (USA).
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 10 mM phosphate, 140 mM NaCl, 3 mM
KCl and a pH of 7.4) was from Calbiochem (Germany). PBS-Tween buffer
(PBST) was prepared by adding 0.05 vol % of Tween 20 to the PBS solution.
1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) was obtained from
Pierce (USA). Ten mM acetate buffer (ACT with pH 4) was prepared from
sodium acetate, and its pH was adjusted by adding acetic acid. An
ethanolamine (ETA) was dissolved in water at the concentration of
1 M, and the pH was adjusted to 8.5 by adding sodium hydroxide. Mouse
immunoglobulin G (mIgG) and goat antimouse IgG (a-mIgG) that was labeled
with Alexa Fluor 647 were purchased from Molecular Probes (USA). All
other chemicals were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany).
Polymer Synthesis
A random terpolymer
composed of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm, 94% monomer
concentration), methacrylic acid (MAA, 5% m.c.), and 4-benzophenonemethacrylate
(BPMA, 1% m.c.) shown in Figure 1 was synthesized
by free-radical polymerization in our laboratory, as described elsewhere.[19] The NIPAAm provided the thermoresponsive characteristics
of the terpolymer, the benzophenone moieties enabled its photo-cross-linking,
and the MAA allowed the postsynthetic modification with proteins.
Figure 1
Schematics
of photo-cross-linkable pNIPAAm hydrogel system and
its modification with protein molecules by using amine coupling chemistry.
Schematics
of photo-cross-linkable pNIPAAm hydrogel system and
its modification with protein molecules by using amine coupling chemistry.
Fabrication
of Sensor Chip
First,
a microheater that consists of 25 nm thick indium tin oxide (ITO)
pad and a pair of 50 nm thick gold electrodes was prepared on a BK7
glass substrate by magnetron sputtering (UNIVEX 450C, Leybold, Germany).
The ITO pad with area of 0.5 × 1 mm and the gold electrode stripes
with width of 0.5 mm were defined by using a set of CO2 laser-cut stencil masks. On top of the ITO microheater, a layer
architecture supporting long-range surface plasmons (LRSPs) was deposited
as described in previous works.[20,21] In brief, a Cytop fluoropolymer
layer with a thickness of 600 nm was spincoated on the top of the
ITO microheater, followed by the sputtering of a 20 nm thick SPR-active
gold film. The Cytop film served as a low refractive index buffer
layer as well as an insulator layer protecting the ITO microheater
and gold electrodes. Because the refractive index of Cytop (n = 1.337 at the wavelength of λ = 633 nm) is close
to that of water and hydrogels, it provides a refractive index symmetrical
geometry that is required for the excitation of LRSPs on the thin
gold film; see Figure 2. Let us note that LRSPs
exhibit lower losses than regular surface plasmons. Therefore, their
excitation is accompanied by narrower resonance that provides a higher
figure of merit in refractometric measurements and is associated with
a stronger field intensity, which is advantageous in various spectroscopy
enhancement strategies.[20]
Figure 2
Sensor chip with embedded
ITO microheater and SPR-active layer
architecture on the top carrying a thermoresponsive pNIPAAm hydrogel
layer.
Sensor chip with embedded
ITO microheater and SPR-active layer
architecture on the top carrying a thermoresponsive pNIPAAm hydrogel
layer.pNIPAAm-based hydrogel layer was
tethered to a gold surface by
using SU-8 or BP-thiol linker layers. The SU-8 layer with the thickness
of 10 nm was prepared by spin-coating. Alternatively, the BP-thiol
self-assembled monolayer (SAM) was formed by overnight incubating
the gold surface in 1 mM BP-thiol solution in ethanol, followed by
rinsing with pure ethanol and drying in a stream of nitrogen. Afterward,
pNIPAAm-based polymer dissolved in ethanol at a concentration of 20
mg/mL was spin-coated onto the surface. The polymer layer was dried
in vacuum and exposed to UV light (irradiation dose of 4 J/cm2 at a wavelength of λ = 365 nm) to covalently cross-link
and attach the polymer network to the gold surface.The thickness dh and refractive index nh of the swollen hydrogel film were probed by
resonantly excited surface waves and determined by fitting respective
reflectivity spectra by a Fresnel-based model, as described in more
detail in the Supporting Information. This
approach relies on the simultaneous excitation of surface waves probing
the hydrogel-coated surface with different penetration depths. In
particular, we took advantage of the fact that the hydrogel film can
serve as a hydrogel optical waveguide (HOW) enabling the excitation
of additional modes besides surface plasmons. A “box”
approximation was used in which a potential gradient of the hydrogel
density perpendicular to the surface was neglected.[12] A similar approach was used for the measurement of the
thickness of a dry hydrogel film dh-dry in contact with air that exhibits a refractive index of nh-dry = 1.48.[14]The post-modification of pNIPAAm-based polymer network by
protein
molecules (mIgG antibodies) was performed in situ by using the amine
coupling. First, the MAA carboxylic moieties were activated by 20
min of incubation in an aqueous solution with a mixture of TFPS (21
mg/mL) and EDC (75 mg/mL). Then, the surface was rinsed with ACT buffer
for 5 min and reacted with mIgG dissolved in ACT buffer at a concentration
of 50 μg/mL. The surface mass density of covalently immobilized
mIgG was varied from Γ = 0 to 27 ng/mm2 (as observed
from respective changes in the thickness dh and refractive index nh(5)) by adjusting the reaction time between 0 and 60 min. Finally,
the unreacted TFPS moieties were blocked by 20 min of incubating in
a 1 M ETA solution, followed by rinsing with PBS for 10 min.
Experimental Setup
An optical setup
utilizing attenuated total reflection (ATR) method with the Kretschmann
configuration was used. This setup combined the angular interrogation
with spatially resolved measurements based on surface plasmon resonance
imaging (SPRI). As shown in Figure 3, a parallel
monochromatic light beam was coupled to a 90° LASFN9 glass prism.
As a light source, He–Ne laser (SPT1, CVI Melles Griot, Germany)
or LED (LE-1R-C, WT&T, Canada) emitting light at a wavelength
of λ = 633 nm were used. Transverse magnetic (TM) polarization
was selected using a polarizer, and a narrow transmission band-pass
filter (FL632.8-10, Thorlabs) was used to block the light at wavelengths
different from 633 nm. At the prism base, a sensor chip with the ITO
microheater and the LRSP-supporting layers was optically matched by
using a refractive index matching oil. The intensity of the light
beam reflected from the prism base was measured with a photodiode
connected to a lock-in amplifier (model 5210, Princeton Applied Research,
USA) or by using a CCD camera (piA1000-48gm, Basler AG, Germany) with
a C-mount camera lens (UNIFOC 58, Schneider Kreuznach, Germany). A
two-circle rotation stage (Huber, Germany) was used for the control
of the angle of incidence θ of a light beam hitting the gold
sensor surface. For the kinetics measurement, the angle of incidence
θ was fixed in the vicinity to the one at which LRSPs were resonantly
excited, and the reflectivity signal R was measured
as a function of time. In the fluorescence experiments, a surface
wave was resonantly excited at the wavelength matching the absorption
band of fluorophore labels λ ≈ λab for
the excitation of fluorescence light. The fluorescence light emitted
at higher wavelength λem by fluorophore labels attached
to affinity-captured molecules was collected through an aqueous medium
by a lens (NA = 0.3). The peak absorption and emission wavelengths
of used Alexa Fluor 647 labels were of λab = 652
and λem = 670 nm, respectively. The intensity of
fluorescence light at λem was measured in counts
per second (cps) by a photomultiplier tube (H6240-01, Hamamatsu, Japan)
that was connected to a counter (53131A, Agilent, USA). For spatially
resolved fluorescence measurements, the photomultiplier tube was replaced
by an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EM-CCD iXon+885,
Andor Technology, Ireland). A set of filters including notch (XNF-632.8-25.0M,
CVI Melles Griot, Germany) and band-pass (670FS10-25, LOT-Oriel, Germany)
filters was used to suppress the background signal.
Figure 3
Optical setup employed
for the spectroscopy of LRSP and HOW modes
that was combined with SPR imaging and surface-plasmon-enhanced fluorescence
spectroscopy.
Optical setup employed
for the spectroscopy of LRSP and HOW modes
that was combined with SPR imaging and surface-plasmon-enhanced fluorescence
spectroscopy.A flow cell with a volume
of 25 μL was attached to the sensor
surface to flow liquid samples at 0.5 mL/min by using a peristaltic
pump. The sensor head comprising the prism, the sensor chip, and the
flow cell was temperature-stabilized at a background temperature T0 by a Peltier device connected to its driver
(LFI3751, Wavelength Electronics, USA). To rapidly heat the sensor
surface, we connected the ITO microheater with a typical resistance
of 280 Ω to a current modulator (NI9265, National Instruments,
USA) via the gold electrodes. The data acquisition, image processing,
and control of the overall sensor system were performed by using home-developed
LabVIEW-based software. Local temperature changes induced by the current
flow through an ITO microheater I were optically
calibrated, and the characteristic response time was determined as δtμ = 50 ms. (More detailed information
is provided in the Supporting Information; see Figure S1a.)
Results and Discussion
Equilibrium Transition of pNIPAAm Hydrogel
First, an
unmodified pNIPAAm hydrogel film with the thickness in
a dry state of dh-dry = 135 nm
was attached to the sensor surface, swollen in water, and probed by
resonantly excited LRSP and hydrogel optical waveguide (HOW) modes.
As Figure 4 shows, the resonant excitation
of LRSPs is manifested as a narrow dip in the angular reflectivity
spectrum located at angles θ = 49.5 to 50.5°. An additional
feature is observed below the critical angle θ< θc, which is associated with
the appearance of a HOW mode. The hydrogel film gradually collapses
as the equilibrium temperature Teq increases,
which leads an increase in its refractive index nh and a decrease in its thickness dh. These changes are manifested as the shift of the LRSP dip
to higher angles θ. In addition, they are accompanied with an
increase in reflectivity below the critical angle θc as the HOW dip disappears. The swelling ratio SR was obtained by dividing the thickness of hydrogel film swollen
in water or buffer dh with that obtained
for a dry film dh-dry in contact
with air. Let us note that SR is related to the polymer
volume fraction Φ ∝ 1/SR. Figure 4b shows the temperature-induced variations in swelling
ratio SR and refractive index nh of the hydrogel film in contact with water. These data show
that swelling ratio SR decreases when increasing
the temperature Teq and that the SR dependence exhibits an inflection point at the LCST =
32 °C for pNIPAAm. The swelling ratio SR is
4.1 times higher for the swollen (SR = 6.2 at Teq = 20 °C) than that for the collapsed
(SR = 1.5 at Teq = 40
°C) hydrogel layer, which agrees with previous studies.[22] The transition of the hydrogel between the swollen
and the collapsed state is accompanied by a refractive index change
as high as Δnh ≈ 0.1 refractive
index units (RIUs). Moreover, this change occurs within a narrow temperature
range that translates to a large thermo-optical coefficient of dnh/dT ≈ 2.2 × 10–2 RIU/K at LCST = 32 °C.
Figure 4
(a) Angular
reflectivity spectra measured upon the probing of an
unmodified pNIPAAm hydrogel film swollen in water at temperatures Teq = 20, 30, 33, and 35 °C. Lines represent
the reflectivity curves fitted by using a Fresnel reflectivity-based
model. (b) Respective temperature-dependent equilibrium swelling ratio SR and refractive index nh.
(a) Angular
reflectivity spectra measured upon the probing of an
unmodified pNIPAAm hydrogel film swollen in water at temperatures Teq = 20, 30, 33, and 35 °C. Lines represent
the reflectivity curves fitted by using a Fresnel reflectivity-based
model. (b) Respective temperature-dependent equilibrium swelling ratio SR and refractive index nh.Afterward, the equilibrium thermoresponsive
properties of pNIPAAm
hydrogel film that was modified with mIgG molecules and brought in
contact with PBS were investigated. In this set of experiments, the
surface mass density Γ of mIgG was adjusted between 0 and 26.4
ng/mm2, and the unreacted carboxylic groups were passivated
by ETA. The surface mass density Γ of immobilized IgG molecules
was determined by the spectroscopy of LRSP and HOW modes, as described
in previous studies.[12,14] Figure 5 compares the obtained SR of unmodified and modified
pNIPAAm hydrogel film in PBS buffer. Interestingly, these data reveal
that the unmodified pNIPAAm hydrogel exhibits a higher swelling ratio
in PBS than in water; even the osmotic pressure is higher due to the
increased salt concentration (e.g., SR = 8.3 in PBS
and 6.3 in water at Teq = 20 °C).
In addition, the thermal responsiveness of the unmodified pNIPAAm
is strongly hindered in PBS as its swelling ratio decreases by a factor
of only 1.3 when increasing the temperature from Teq = 20 to 40 °C (see curve 1 in Figure 5). Let us note that a similar behavior was observed
by atomic force microscopy (AFM) for the pNIPAAm hydrogel films containing
carboxylic moieties when they were swollen in Tris buffer.[23] These AFM studies indicated that the increment
of buffering agent in a solution leads ionization of carboxylic moieties
and enhances solubility of the hydrogel. These effects are accompanied
by a shift of the LCST above 32 °C, which is outside the temperature
range used in this work. The solubility of the hydrogel film in PBS
is suppressed by converting the carboxylic groups to hydroxyl moieties
through the modification of MAA with ETA. The ETA-modified pNIPAAm
hydrogel in PBS exhibits partially recovered thermoresponsiveness
in PBS. When increasing the temperature from Teq = 20 to 40 °C, the swelling ratio of ETA-modified hydrogel
decreases by a factor of 2.3. (See curve 2 in Figure 5.) If the carboxylic groups are modified with mIgG, followed
by the passivation with ETA, then the strength of a hydrogel collapse
gradually decreases as the surface mass density of mIgG increases.
As seen in Figure 5 (curves 3 and 4), collapse
factors of 2.2 and 1.4 were observed for hydrogel films with mIgG
surface mass density of Γ = 8.2 and 26.4 ng/mm2,
respectively. This weak thermoresponsiveness of IgG-modified hydrogel
can be attributed to the good solubility of immobilized proteins in
the buffer solution. Therefore, the collapse of the hydrogel may be
spatially hindered by the presence of (hydrophilic) proteins. This
weaker thermally induced collapse of the mIgG-modified hydrogel in
contact with PBS is associated with significantly lower thermo-optical
coefficient of dnh/dT ≈ 10–3 RIU/K at Teq = 32 °C compared with the unmodified hydrogel swollen
in water. (See curve 4 in Figure 5.)
Figure 5
Comparison
of the temperature dependence of the equilibrium swelling
ratio SR for the unmodified hydrogel (triangles),
hydrogel modified by ETA (diamonds), and hydrogel decorated with mIgG
molecules with surface mass density of Γ = 8.2 (circle) and
26.4 ng/mm2 (squares) swollen in PBS.
Comparison
of the temperature dependence of the equilibrium swelling
ratio SR for the unmodified hydrogel (triangles),
hydrogel modified by ETA (diamonds), and hydrogel decorated with mIgG
molecules with surface mass density of Γ = 8.2 (circle) and
26.4 ng/mm2 (squares) swollen in PBS.
Transition Kinetics of pNIPAAm-Based Hydrogel
Films
Kinetics of the swelling and collapse of pNIPAAm hydrogel
films was studied by measuring the reflectivity variations upon rapid
temperature changes that were induced by applying current to the ITO
microheater. First, these kinetics were observed for the unmodified
pNIPAAm hydrogel film in contact with water. In this experiment, the
background temperature was adjusted to T0 = 20 °C by using the Peltier element. The angle of incidence
was set to θ = 49.8° at the slope of the reflectivity dip
that is associated with the coupling to LRSPs; see Figure 4a. The reflectivity signal R was
recorded every 20 ms, which is shorter than the response time of the
ITO microheater, δtμ ≈
50 ms. As Figure 6a shows, a stable baseline
was first established for the temperature on the surface Teq equal to that of background T0. Afterward, the current flow I was applied
through the microheater at t = 0 for 5 s, which resulted
in an increased equilibrium local temperature Teq. The temperature Teq was tuned
from 25 to 34 °C by the current I between 5
and 13 mA. The temperature-induced collapse of the hydrogel is manifested
as an increase in the measured reflectivity R, which
is associated with an increase in the refractive index, nh, and a decrease in thickness, dh. When increasing the equilibrium temperature, Teq, the reflectivity R saturates at higher
levels due to the stronger collapse of the hydrogel film. Finally,
the current flow I was switched off and the local
temperature was relaxed back to T0. This
change is accompanied with rapid swelling of the hydrogel and subsequent
drop of the reflectivity signal R. The reflectivity
changes δR observed on the sensor surface carrying
the pNIPAAm hydrogel are of opposite sign and exhibit an order of
magnitude higher amplitude than those measured for the bare gold surface
in contact with water. (See Figure S1a in Supporting
Information.) The reason is that the thermo-optical coefficient
of the pNIPAAm hydrogel dnh/dTeq = 2.2 × 10–2 RIU/K is much larger
than that of waterdnH/dTeq = −1.2 × 10–4 RIU/K at Teq = 32 °C.
Figure 6
Kinetics of
swelling and collapse of unmodified pNIPAAm hydrogel
film in contact with water (a) seen from reflectivity changes and
(b) respective deconvoluted variations in hydrogel thickness dh. Current pulses were applied to the ITO microheater
to increase the equilibrium temperature between Teq = 25 and 34 °C, and the background temperature
was kept at T0 = 20 °C.
Kinetics of
swelling and collapse of unmodified pNIPAAm hydrogel
film in contact with water (a) seen from reflectivity changes and
(b) respective deconvoluted variations in hydrogel thickness dh. Current pulses were applied to the ITO microheater
to increase the equilibrium temperature between Teq = 25 and 34 °C, and the background temperature
was kept at T0 = 20 °C.Let us note that variations in the reflectivity
signal R due to the temperature-induced detuning
of resonant excitation
of LRSPs do not change linearly with the hydrogel thickness dh; see Figure 4a. To
obtain more detailed information on the swelling and collapse kinetics,
we determined the changes in hydrogel thickness dh as a function of time by comparing the reflectivity
signal R in Figure 6a to a
series of angular spectra in Figure 4a that
were measured and fitted at different equilibrium temperatures Teq. An example in Figure 6b shows that the swelling of the hydrogel layer occurs in a shorter
time than the collapse process. In addition, one can see that the
swelling and the collapse proceed in two different phases. In the
initial phase of the collapse process, the thickness of the hydrogel
rapidly decreases from dh = 690 to ∼400
nm with a characteristic time of δtI ≈ 100 ms (phase I). Subsequently, the hydrogel reaches the
equilibrium thickness of dh = 290 nm through
a much slower transition with a characteristic time of δtII ≈ 1 s (phase II). Compared with the
collapse process, the initial swelling (phase I) proceeds faster in
δtI ≈ 50 ms (which is close
to the response time of used ITO microheater δtμ). The following slower phase II is less pronounced
and exhibits a characteristic time of δtII ≈ 1 s. The rapid phase I of the swelling and collapse
is probably associated with the fast diffusion of water in and out
of the polymer network. The slower phase II observed upon the collapsing
of the hydrogel can be attributed to hindered diffusion of water through
a dense polymer network and to the possible slow rearrangement of
polymer chains in the crowded environment of densely packed chains.[24] The swelling phase II is probably associated
with a slow process in which equilibrium between forces driving the
swelling and counter-acting strain is established. The polymers used
in this study contain three types of monomers (NIPAAm, MAA, and MABP)
with different polarity. In particular, the benzophenone groups of
the photo-cross-linker monomer MABP are highly apolar and are expected
to aggregate during collapse as the polymer density increases and
these MABP groups come closer. Upon swelling, the fast kinetics relates
to rehydration of the pNIPAAm chains with MAA groups, which generates
strain on the network and the hydrophobic aggregates. These aggregates
may then slowly restructure and dissolve under the strain of the swollen
network, leading to a slow dynamics observed in phase II. Let us note
that the difference in the kinetics of swelling and collapse can be
also partially ascribed to different slopes dSR/dTeq at the temperature where the hydrogel is
swollen (dSR/dTeq = −0.12
K–1 at Teq = 22.5 °C)
and collapsed (dSR/dTeq = −0.49 K–1 at Teq = 32 °C).Assuming that the initial phase of hydrogel
transition between
swollen and collapsed state is dominated by 1D Fickian diffusion,
its response time to an external stimulus can be described as δtI ≈ dh2/2Dm (where Dm is a mutual diffusion coefficient). For the hydrogel
film with a thickness of dh = 690 nm and
the response time δtI ≈ 100
ms, this equation predicts the mutual diffusion coefficient Dm of ∼4 × 10–6 mm2 s–1, which is within the lower
range of values reported for comparable hydrogel films by other works.[25] For similar NIPAAm-based cross-linked network
with the swelling ratio SR ≈ 10 at room temperature,
the cooperative diffusion coefficient of polymer chains Dcoop ≈ 4 × 10–5 mm2 s–1 was measured in ethanol by dynamic light scattering.[24] This value is an order of magnitude higher than
the estimated lower limit of Dm, which
indicates that swelling and collapse of investigated polymer network
is probably faster than the time resolution of developed microheater
system. The kinetics of swelling and collapse of the IgG-modified
hydrogel film in contact with PBS exhibited similar response times
as the unmodified pNIPAAm hydrogel in contact with water. (See the Supporting Information.) Let us note that the
swelling and collapse of the hydrogel film was fully reversible. Figure 7 presents an example of the kinetics of reflectivity
signal upon periodic series of 100 ms current pulses applied to the
ITO microheater with mIgG-modified hydrogel in contact with PBS on
its top. The swelling and collapse process of the hydrogel film was
highly reproducible for several hundreds of cycles, and the reflectivity
peak width of Δt ≈ 100 ms (defined as
full width at half-maximum (fwhm)) was similar to that of the current
pulses.
Figure 7
Reflectivity response to series of temperature pulses on the sensor
surface with NIPAAm-based hydrogel modified with mIgG and swollen
PBS. Current pulses with the magnitude of 14 mA were applied with
2 s interval, and the background temperature was set to T0 = 20 °C.
Reflectivity response to series of temperature pulses on the sensor
surface with NIPAAm-based hydrogel modified with mIgG and swollen
PBS. Current pulses with the magnitude of 14 mA were applied with
2 s interval, and the background temperature was set to T0 = 20 °C.
Concept of a Surface Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence
Biosensor
The presented approach for rapid tuning of SPR
can provide new functionalities in biosensors relying on probing the
sensor surface with resonantly excited surface plasmons. We show an
example in which the detuning of SPR allows for modulating of fluorescence
signal in assays that employ surface plasmon-amplified excitation
of fluorescence light. In this experiment, a thermoresponsive pNIPAAm
hydrogel film (with a thickness of dh =
860 nm at Teq= 20 °C) was attached
to a gold surface with an embedded microheater. The hydrogel polymer
network was modified with mIgG by the amine coupling strategy, followed
by the affinity capture of a-mIgG (representing a target analyte)
that was labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 dyes. The surface mass densities
of mIgG and a-mIgG inside the hydrogel network were determined as
Γ = 19 and 3.3 ng/mm2, respectively, by fitting of
the respective reflectivity spectra. As Figure 8a reveals, the binding of a-mIgG is manifested by a strong fluorescence
signal F occurring at resonance angles where the
coupling to HOW and LRSP modes occurs. The reason is that the excitation
of such surface waves provides an enhanced electric field intensity
that increases the excitation rate of fluorophore labels in the pNIPAAm
binding matrix. When the local temperature increases from Teq = 23 to 35 °C, the resonance angles
and the respective fluorescence peaks associated with coupling to
HOW and LRSP modes shift; see Figure 8b. Therefore,
the fluorescence signal excited with HOW or LRSP optical waves at
respective resonant angles of incidence can be virtually switched
on and off by swelling and collapse of the hydrogel binding matrix.
In further kinetics measurements, we set the incident angle at θ
= 47.5°, where the excitation by HOW mode occurs at Teq = 23 °C. As seen in Figure 8c, the sensor surface was first operated at Teq = 35 °C for which the coupling to HOW does not occur
and thus only weak fluorescence signal F is observed.
After switching off the ITO microheater to cool the surface to Teq = 23 °C, the reflectivity signal R drops, which indicates a stronger coupling to HOW modes
and results in the occurrence of a strong fluorescence signal F. When switching the temperature back to Teq = 35 °C, the reflectivity increases to original
level and the fluorescence signal drops back to the background. Let
us note that the gradual decrease in the signal after switching the
excitation field on is probably due to bleaching of the fluorescent
dyes. The inserted images in Figure 8c show
the spatial distribution of the fluorescence signal from a sensing
spot that was observed by an EM-CCD camera. Upon coupling to the HOW
mode for Teq = 23 °C, a clear fluorescence
signal from the functionalized pad is observed. After increasing the
temperature to Teq = 35 °C, the fluorescence
signal decreases to the background level and the bright pad disappears.
Figure 8
Angular
reflectivity and fluorescence spectra for pNIPAAm hydrogel
film modified with mIgG (a) before and after the capture of labeled
a-mIgG at Teq = 20 °C and (b) after
the subsequent change of the equilibrium temperature to Teq = 23 and 35 °C. (c) Time evolution of reflectivity R and fluorescence intensity F upon switching
the excitation of HOW at an angle of 47.5° on and off by changing
current flow I. Inserted pictures show the respective
fluorescence images of sensor spot. (The angular spectra were taken
from different sensing areas on the same sensor chip, which caused
differences in the fluorescence intensities presented in panels a–c.)
Angular
reflectivity and fluorescence spectra for pNIPAAm hydrogel
film modified with mIgG (a) before and after the capture of labeled
a-mIgG at Teq = 20 °C and (b) after
the subsequent change of the equilibrium temperature to Teq = 23 and 35 °C. (c) Time evolution of reflectivity R and fluorescence intensity F upon switching
the excitation of HOW at an angle of 47.5° on and off by changing
current flow I. Inserted pictures show the respective
fluorescence images of sensor spot. (The angular spectra were taken
from different sensing areas on the same sensor chip, which caused
differences in the fluorescence intensities presented in panels a–c.)
Conclusions
A new concept for rapid tuning of SPR in advanced biosensor applications
is presented. This approach is based on a sensor chip with a metallic
layer, thermoresponsive pNIPAAm hydrogel film, and an embedded ITO
microheater. The reversible swelling and collapse of the hydrogel
film allows for strong variations of refractive index on the metallic
sensor surface due to the large pNIPAAm thermo-optical coefficient.
The swelling and collapse occur with a characteristic response time
below 100 ms, are fully reversible, and depend on the hydrogel postmodification
and on the swelling buffer. The used pNIPAAm-based hydrogel system
is particularly attractive for biosensor applications because it can
simultaneously serve as a large binding-capacity matrix for the specific
capture of molecular analytes. An example of possible application
in a surface plasmon-enhanced fluorescence biosensing is presented.
We show that rapid switching on and off the surface plasmon-enhanced
field intensity allows us to efficiently tune the excitation strength
of fluorescence light. Among others, this functionality holds potential
for multiplexing of sensing channels through sequential readout of
the fluorescence signal emitted from different spatially separated
sensing spots.
Authors: Jon A Schuller; Edward S Barnard; Wenshan Cai; Young Chul Jun; Justin S White; Mark L Brongersma Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Joseph S T Smalley; Yanhui Zhao; Ahmad Ahsan Nawaz; Qingzhen Hao; Yi Ma; Iam-Choon Khoo; Tony Jun Huang Journal: Opt Express Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Simone A Costa; Joseph R Simon; Miriam Amiram; Lei Tang; Stefan Zauscher; Eric M Brustad; Farren J Isaacs; Ashutosh Chilkoti Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Alexander D Hudson; Matthew R Ponte; Fariha Mahmood; Thomas Pena Ventura; Kalaichelvi Saravanamuttu Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Nityanand Sharma; Hamid Keshmiri; Xiaodong Zhou; Ten It Wong; Christian Petri; Ulrich Jonas; Bo Liedberg; Jakub Dostalek Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Nestor Gisbert Quilis; Simone Hageneder; Stefan Fossati; Simone K Auer; Priyamvada Venugopalan; Anil Bozdogan; Christian Petri; Alberto Moreno-Cencerrado; Jose Luis Toca-Herrera; Ulrich Jonas; Jakub Dostalek Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 4.126