Literature DB >> 23761464

Perception and coding of envelopes in weakly electric fishes.

Sarah A Stamper1, Eric S Fortune, Maurice J Chacron.   

Abstract

Natural sensory stimuli have a rich spatiotemporal structure and can often be characterized as a high frequency signal that is independently modulated at lower frequencies. This lower frequency modulation is known as the envelope. Envelopes are commonly found in a variety of sensory signals, such as contrast modulations of visual stimuli and amplitude modulations of auditory stimuli. While psychophysical studies have shown that envelopes can carry information that is essential for perception, how envelope information is processed in the brain is poorly understood. Here we review the behavioral salience and neural mechanisms for the processing of envelopes in the electrosensory system of wave-type gymnotiform weakly electric fishes. These fish can generate envelope signals through movement, interactions of their electric fields in social groups or communication signals. The envelopes that result from the first two behavioral contexts differ in their frequency content, with movement envelopes typically being of lower frequency. Recent behavioral evidence has shown that weakly electric fish respond in robust and stereotypical ways to social envelopes to increase the envelope frequency. Finally, neurophysiological results show how envelopes are processed by peripheral and central electrosensory neurons. Peripheral electrosensory neurons respond to both stimulus and envelope signals. Neurons in the primary hindbrain recipient of these afferents, the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL), exhibit heterogeneities in their responses to stimulus and envelope signals. Complete segregation of stimulus and envelope information is achieved in neurons in the target of ELL efferents, the midbrain torus semicircularis (Ts).

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrosensory system; jamming avoidance response; second-order statistics; social envelope response

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23761464      PMCID: PMC4529321          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.082321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  58 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Receptive field organization determines pyramidal cell stimulus-encoding capability and spatial stimulus selectivity.

Authors:  Joseph Bastian; Maurice J Chacron; Leonard Maler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spike-frequency adaptation separates transient communication signals from background oscillations.

Authors:  Jan Benda; André Longtin; Len Maler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A synchronization-desynchronization code for natural communication signals.

Authors:  Jan Benda; André Longtin; Leonard Maler
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Receptive field organization across multiple electrosensory maps. I. Columnar organization and estimation of receptive field size.

Authors:  Leonard Maler
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Spectral envelope coding in cat primary auditory cortex: linear and non-linear effects of stimulus characteristics.

Authors:  B M Calhoun; C E Schreiner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 7.  Efficient computation via sparse coding in electrosensory neural networks.

Authors:  Maurice J Chacron; André Longtin; Leonard Maler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: behavior.

Authors:  J Bastian
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: high-frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish, Eigenmannia.

Authors:  H Scheich; T H Bullock; R H Hamstra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Coding conspecific identity and motion in the electric sense.

Authors:  Na Yu; Ginette Hupé; Charles Garfinkle; John E Lewis; André Longtin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  25 in total

1.  Parallel sparse and dense information coding streams in the electrosensory midbrain.

Authors:  Michael K J Sproule; Michael G Metzen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Contrast coding in the electrosensory system: parallels with visual computation.

Authors:  Stephen E Clarke; André Longtin; Leonard Maler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Weakly electric fish display behavioral responses to envelopes naturally occurring during movement: implications for neural processing.

Authors:  Michael G Metzen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Coding of envelopes by correlated but not single-neuron activity requires neural variability.

Authors:  Michael G Metzen; Mohsen Jamali; Jérome Carriot; Oscar Ávila-Ǻkerberg; Kathleen E Cullen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neural heterogeneities determine response characteristics to second-, but not first-order stimulus features.

Authors:  Michael G Metzen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  SK channel subtypes enable parallel optimized coding of behaviorally relevant stimulus attributes: A review.

Authors:  Chengjie G Huang; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  Optimized Parallel Coding of Second-Order Stimulus Features by Heterogeneous Neural Populations.

Authors:  Chengjie G Huang; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The complexity of high-frequency electric fields degrades electrosensory inputs: implications for the jamming avoidance response in weakly electric fish.

Authors:  Aaron R Shifman; John E Lewis
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Motion parallax in electric sensing.

Authors:  Federico Pedraja; Volker Hofmann; Kathleen M Lucas; Colleen Young; Jacob Engelmann; John E Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Electrosensory processing in Apteronotus albifrons: implications for general and specific neural coding strategies across wave-type weakly electric fish species.

Authors:  Diana Martinez; Michael G Metzen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.