Literature DB >> 23761176

Does rewording MRI reports improve patient understanding and emotional response to a clinical report?

Jeroen K J Bossen1, Michiel G J S Hageman, John D King, David C Ring.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic MRI reports can be distressing for patients with limited health literacy. Humans tend to prepare for the worst particularly when we are in pain, and words like "tear" can make us feel damaged and in need of repair. Research on words used in provider-patient interactions have shown an affect on response to treatment and coping strategies, but the literature on this remains relatively sparse. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aim of this observational cross-sectional study is to determine whether rewording of MRI reports in understandable, more dispassionate language will result in better patient ratings of emotional response, satisfaction, usefulness, and understanding. Furthermore, we wanted to find out which type of report patients would choose to receive.
METHODS: One hundred patients visiting an orthopaedic hand and upper extremity outpatient office for reasons unrelated to the presented MRI report were enrolled. Four MRI reports, concerning upper extremity conditions, were reworded to an eighth-grade reading level and with the use of neutral descriptive words and the most optimistic interpretations based on current best evidence. After reading each report, emotional response was measured using the Self Assessment Manikin (SAM). Subjects also completed questions about satisfaction, usefulness, and understanding of the report.
RESULTS: According to the results of the SAM questionnaire, the reworded MRI reports resulted in significantly higher pleasure and dominance scores and lower arousal scores. The mean satisfaction, usefulness, and understanding scores of the reworded report were significantly higher compared with the original reports. Seventy percent of the patients preferred the reworded reports over the original reports.
CONCLUSIONS: Emotional response, satisfaction, usefulness, and understanding were all superior in MRI reports reworded for lower reading level and optimal emotional content and optimism. Given that patients increasingly have access to their medical records and diagnostic reports, attention to health literacy and psychologic aspects of the report may help optimize health and patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23761176      PMCID: PMC3792273          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3100-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Imputation of missing longitudinal data: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Jean Mundahl Engels; Paula Diehr
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Perspectives on cancer patient education.

Authors:  J T Treacy; D K Mayer
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.315

3.  A comparison of younger and older adults' self-assessment manikin ratings of affective pictures.

Authors:  Richard W Backs; Sergio P da Silva; Kyunghee Han
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Integrating patient values into evidence-based practice: effective communication for shared decision-making.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Vranceanu; Cynthia Cooper; David Ring
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.907

5.  Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusers.

Authors:  Anna Lembke
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Reduce malpractice risks through better communication.

Authors:  D Holthaus
Journal:  Hospitals       Date:  1987-11-20

7.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

Authors:  M M Bradley; P J Lang
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03

8.  Can words hurt? Patient-provider interactions during invasive procedures.

Authors:  Elvira V Lang; Olga Hatsiopoulou; Timo Koch; Kevin Berbaum; Susan Lutgendorf; Eva Kettenmann; Henrietta Logan; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Written notification of test results: meanings, comprehension and implication on patients' health behavior.

Authors:  Orit Karnieli-Miller; Adir Adler; Lili Merdler; Lilia Rosenfeld; Shmuel Eidelman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-08-05

10.  To be reassured or to understand? A dilemma in communicating normal cervical screening results.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Matthew Thompson; Matthew Hankins
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2004-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Linguistic tones in MRI reports correlate with severity of pathology for rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Authors:  Eugene Kim; Billy Table; David Ring; Amirreza Fatehi; Tom Joris Crijns
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Consumer understanding of terms used in imaging reports requested for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Caitlin Farmer; Denise A O'Connor; Hopin Lee; Kirsten McCaffery; Christopher Maher; Dave Newell; Aidan Cashin; David Byfield; Jeffrey Jarvik; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Can we have an overall osteoarthritis severity score for the patellofemoral joint using magnetic resonance imaging? Reliability and validity.

Authors:  Sarah Kobayashi; Anthony Peduto; Milena Simic; Marlene Fransen; Kathryn Refshauge; Jean Mah; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Communicating laboratory test results for rheumatoid factor: what do patients and physicians want?

Authors:  Ariella Kelman; Caroline O Robinson; Elisenda Cochin; Nina J Ahluwalia; Julia Braverman; Emil Chiauzzi; Kristina Simacek
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.