Literature DB >> 16147461

A comparison of younger and older adults' self-assessment manikin ratings of affective pictures.

Richard W Backs1, Sergio P da Silva, Kyunghee Han.   

Abstract

Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) ratings were used to examine whether groups of 21 younger (M age = 20.02 years, SD = 2.28) and 21 older (M age = 66.26 years, SD = 5.64) adults had similar affective experiences to pictures from the International Affective Picture System (Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 1997). The psychometrics of the SAM valence and arousal scales were also compared across age groups. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was similar for younger and older adults, where both groups made less consistent valence ratings than arousal ratings. Both groups differed from the norms for valence for pleasant pictures, but were no more different from each other than they were from the norms. Age group differences were most evident in the pleasant region of the bivariate valence by arousal affective space, where younger adults found pleasant-aroused pictures to be more pleasant and arousing than older adults did. We suggest that this age group difference could be explained by greater affect intensity and surgency for the younger group and greater emotional control and leveling of positive affect for the older group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16147461     DOI: 10.1080/03610730500206808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  35 in total

1.  Emotion processing in the aging brain is modulated by semantic elaboration.

Authors:  Maureen Ritchey; Brandy Bessette-Symons; Scott M Hayes; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Interaction of intensity and order regarding painful events.

Authors:  Brandon N Kyle; Daniel W McNeil; Benjamin J Weinstein; James D Mark
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-03-12

3.  Now you feel it, now you don't: Motivated attention to emotional content is modulated by age and task demands.

Authors:  Didem Pehlivanoglu; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Age differences in emotion-induced blindness: Positivity effects in early attention.

Authors:  Briana L Kennedy; Ringo Huang; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-08-12

5.  Affective Influences on Older Adults' Attention to Self-Relevant Negative Information.

Authors:  Claire M Growney; Thomas M Hess
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  How do you feel when you check your body? Emotional states during a body-checking episode in normal-weight females.

Authors:  Leonie Wilhelm; Andrea S Hartmann; Martin Cordes; Manuel Waldorf; Silja Vocks
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.652

7.  Affective reactivity differences in pregnant and postpartum women.

Authors:  Laina Rosebrock; Denada Hoxha; Jackie Gollan
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Applying a dual process model of self-regulation: The association between executive working memory capacity, negative urgency, and negative mood induction on pre-potent response inhibition.

Authors:  Rachel L Gunn; Peter R Finn
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2015-03-01

9.  Effects of aging on functional connectivity of the amygdala during negative evaluation: a network analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Peggy St Jacques; Florin Dolcos; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Age-related alterations in simple declarative memory and the effect of negative stimulus valence.

Authors:  Vishnu P Murty; Fabio Sambataro; Saumitra Das; Hao-Yang Tan; Joseph H Callicott; Terry E Goldberg; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Daniel R Weinberger; Venkata S Mattay
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.