Literature DB >> 23760616

Antiphospholipid antibodies and the risk of recurrence after a first episode of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.

David Garcia1, Elie A Akl, Richard Carr, Clive Kearon.   

Abstract

Laboratory evidence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) in patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often considered an indication for indefinite anticoagulant therapy, but it is uncertain if this practice is justified. We performed a systematic review to determine whether the presence of APLA in patients with a first VTE is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge through February 2012 and included prospective studies that met prespecified design criteria. There were 109 recurrent VTE in 588 patients with APLA and 374 recurrent VTE in 1914 patients without APLA (relative risk 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 2.36). The unadjusted risk ratio for recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulant therapy in patients with an anticardiolipin antibody was 1.53 (95% CI, 0.76-3.11), and with a lupus anticoagulant was 2.83 (95% CI, 0.83-9.64). All studies had important methodologic limitations and we judged the overall quality of the evidence as very low. Although a positive APLA test appears to predict an increased risk of recurrence in patients with a first VTE, the strength of this association is uncertain because the available evidence is of very low quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23760616     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-496257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  24 in total

Review 1.  Predicting the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Authors:  Michael B Streiff
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Thrombophilia: clinical-practical aspects.

Authors:  Stephan Moll
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias.

Authors:  Leslie Skeith
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 4.  Venous thromboembolism: Predicting recurrence and the need for extended anticoagulation.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; Yogendra Kanthi; James B Froehlich
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 5.  Role of thrombophilia testing: con.

Authors:  Scott M Stevens
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  To Test or Not to Test: Thrombophilia in Venous Thromboembolisms.

Authors:  Hung Chang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.672

7.  Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Recurrent Thrombotic Events: Persistence and Portfolio.

Authors:  Colum F Amory; Steven R Levine; Robin L Brey; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Stanley Tuhrim; Barbara C Tilley; Ann-Catherin C Simpson; Ralph L Sacco; Jay P Mohr
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 8.  Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Shruti Chaturvedi; Keith R McCrae
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 8.250

9.  Antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent thrombosis after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Sameer Parpia; Frederick A Spencer; Trevor Baglin; Scott M Stevens; Kenneth A Bauer; Steven R Lentz; Craig M Kessler; James D Douketis; Stephan Moll; Scott Kaatz; Sam Schulman; Jean M Connors; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Luciana Spadafora; Vinai Bhagirath; Patricia C Liaw; Jeffrey I Weitz; Jim A Julian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  John A Heit
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.