BACKGROUND: There are very limited prospective data on the significance of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and recurrent thrombo-occlusive events (TOEs). We investigated the prognostic value of (1) 2 newer aPL assays, (2) an aPL portfolio and (3) persistent aPL positivity following stroke. METHODS: A total of 1,770 subjects from the APASS-WARSS study underwent further aPL testing for antibodies to phosphatidylserine (aPS) andanti-β2-glycoprotein-I (anti-β2GPI) from stored sera. Follow-up aPL status was also tested in a subset of subjects. Primary analysis was based on time to any TOE (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or systemic arterial occlusion)/death at 2 years. Cox proportional hazard analyses assessed whether aPL independently related to outcome. RESULTS: Persistent anti-β2GPI decreased the time to TOE/death after adjustment for potential confounders (hazards ratio (HR) 2.86, 95% CI 1.21-6.76, p = 0.017). When persistent anti-β2GPI was combined with another persistently positive aPL, time to TOE/death was also reduced (HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.18-12.14, p = 0.025). Neither persistent anticardiolipin antibodies nor persistent aPS alone nor a single positive anti-β2GPI nor aPS was associated with decreased time to TOE/death. No single positive aPL, portfolio of baseline aPL or any persistent aPL increased the rate of TOE/death. CONCLUSIONS:Rates of TOE/death were not influenced by aPL results at baseline or follow-up. Persistent anti-β2GPI alone, and with persistent second aPL, was independently associated with decreased time to TOE/death. Persistent aPL, an aPL portfolio and newer aPL in ischemic stroke patients are not helpful in predicting an increased rate of recurrent TOEs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There are very limited prospective data on the significance of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and recurrent thrombo-occlusive events (TOEs). We investigated the prognostic value of (1) 2 newer aPL assays, (2) an aPL portfolio and (3) persistent aPL positivity following stroke. METHODS: A total of 1,770 subjects from the APASS-WARSS study underwent further aPL testing for antibodies to phosphatidylserine (aPS) and anti-β2-glycoprotein-I (anti-β2GPI) from stored sera. Follow-up aPL status was also tested in a subset of subjects. Primary analysis was based on time to any TOE (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or systemic arterial occlusion)/death at 2 years. Cox proportional hazard analyses assessed whether aPL independently related to outcome. RESULTS: Persistent anti-β2GPI decreased the time to TOE/death after adjustment for potential confounders (hazards ratio (HR) 2.86, 95% CI 1.21-6.76, p = 0.017). When persistent anti-β2GPI was combined with another persistently positive aPL, time to TOE/death was also reduced (HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.18-12.14, p = 0.025). Neither persistent anticardiolipin antibodies nor persistent aPS alone nor a single positive anti-β2GPI nor aPS was associated with decreased time to TOE/death. No single positive aPL, portfolio of baseline aPL or any persistent aPL increased the rate of TOE/death. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of TOE/death were not influenced by aPL results at baseline or follow-up. Persistent anti-β2GPI alone, and with persistent second aPL, was independently associated with decreased time to TOE/death. Persistent aPL, an aPL portfolio and newer aPL in ischemic strokepatients are not helpful in predicting an increased rate of recurrent TOEs.
Authors: M A P Audrain; D El-Kouri; M A Hamidou; L Mioche; A Ibara; M-L Langlois; J-Y Muller Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Steven R Levine; Robin L Brey; Barbara C Tilley; J L P Thompson; Ralph L Sacco; Robert R Sciacca; A Murphy; Yimeng Lu; Teresa M Costigan; Candi Rhine; Bruce Levin; Douglas A Triplett; J P Mohr Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robin L Brey; Christian L Stallworth; David L McGlasson; Marcella A Wozniak; Robert J Wityk; Barney J Stern; Michael A Sloan; Roger Sherwin; Thomas R Price; Richard F Macko; Constance J Johnson; Christopher J Earley; David W Buchholz; J Richard Hebel; Steven J Kittner Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S Lanthier; F J Kirkham; L G Mitchell; R M Laxer; E Atenafu; C Male; M Prengler; T Domi; A K C Chan; R Liesner; G deVeber Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-01-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Eun Young Lee; Chang-Keun Lee; Tae Hoon Lee; Son Mi Chung; Seong Ho Kim; You Sook Cho; Bin Yoo; Hee-Bom Moon Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2003 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Jung Yoon Pyo; Seung Min Jung; Sang Won Lee; Jason Jungsik Song; Soo Kon Lee; Yong Beom Park Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Florian Posch; Johanna Gebhart; Jacob H Rand; Silvia Koder; Peter Quehenberger; Vittorio Pengo; Cihan Ay; Ingrid Pabinger Journal: BMC Med Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Ilan Volkov; Luciana Seguro; Elaine P Leon; László Kovács; Dirk Roggenbuck; Peter Schierack; Boris Gilburd; Andrea Doria; Maria G Tektonidou; Nancy Agmon-Levin Journal: Auto Immun Highlights Date: 2020-05-15