IMPORTANCE: Today's general surgery interns are faced with increased duty hour restrictions and stringent competency-based supervision milestone requirements (ie, from direct to indirect supervision). Working within these constraints, we instituted a unique 2-month intern curriculum (boot camp) incorporating knowledge-based, experiential, and practical components. OBJECTIVES: To describe our curriculum and the effect on resident performance and teaching faculty and nursing staff perceptions. DESIGN: All interns underwent a 2-month (July and August 2011) boot camp curriculum consisting of two 2½-hour knowledge-based and procedural skills (SimMan) didactic sessions per week and completion of 25 core intensive introductory American College of Surgeons Fundamentals of Surgery web-based self-study modules, followed by a standardized patient clinical skills assessment. SETTING: Integrated general surgery residency program at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington. PARTICIPANTS: Postgraduate year 1 general surgery categorical and preliminary residents. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used several assessment tools, including an intern boot camp survey, clinical skills assessment scores, intern American Board of Surgeons In-Training Examination scores, and nursing staff and teaching faculty surveys of intern performance and aptitudes compared with the previous year's interns. Data were analyzed by independent group t test, χ2 tests of proportions, and Fisher exact test for small sample cross tables. RESULTS: In total, 84% (91 of 108) of intern respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the usefulness, relevance, and execution of the boot camp. Compared with the previous year's interns, the nursing staff agreed or strongly agreed that the cohort interns were better at patient assessment, collaboration, and effective communication and provided compassionate and respectful patient care. More than 40% (7 of 17) of surveyed teaching faculty agreed or strongly agreed that the cohort interns demonstrated better patient care and procedural skills and self-confidence compared with the previous year's interns. The clinical skills assessment scores after the 2-month boot camp paralleled the scores typically seen at the end of the previous 2 internship years (P > .25 for all). The proportion of nondesignated and categorical interns pursuing careers in general surgery scoring in the top quartile on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination increased from 7% (2 of 28) to 50% (5 of 10) compared with the previous 2 internship years (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Recent changes in intern duty hours and supervision rules mandate that residency training programs must institute a competency-oriented curriculum to provide interns with the necessary knowledge and practical skills to attain clinical competence.
IMPORTANCE: Today's general surgery interns are faced with increased duty hour restrictions and stringent competency-based supervision milestone requirements (ie, from direct to indirect supervision). Working within these constraints, we instituted a unique 2-month intern curriculum (boot camp) incorporating knowledge-based, experiential, and practical components. OBJECTIVES: To describe our curriculum and the effect on resident performance and teaching faculty and nursing staff perceptions. DESIGN: All interns underwent a 2-month (July and August 2011) boot camp curriculum consisting of two 2½-hour knowledge-based and procedural skills (SimMan) didactic sessions per week and completion of 25 core intensive introductory American College of Surgeons Fundamentals of Surgery web-based self-study modules, followed by a standardized patient clinical skills assessment. SETTING: Integrated general surgery residency program at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington. PARTICIPANTS: Postgraduate year 1 general surgery categorical and preliminary residents. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used several assessment tools, including an intern boot camp survey, clinical skills assessment scores, intern American Board of Surgeons In-Training Examination scores, and nursing staff and teaching faculty surveys of intern performance and aptitudes compared with the previous year's interns. Data were analyzed by independent group t test, χ2 tests of proportions, and Fisher exact test for small sample cross tables. RESULTS: In total, 84% (91 of 108) of intern respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the usefulness, relevance, and execution of the boot camp. Compared with the previous year's interns, the nursing staff agreed or strongly agreed that the cohort interns were better at patient assessment, collaboration, and effective communication and provided compassionate and respectful patient care. More than 40% (7 of 17) of surveyed teaching faculty agreed or strongly agreed that the cohort interns demonstrated better patient care and procedural skills and self-confidence compared with the previous year's interns. The clinical skills assessment scores after the 2-month boot camp paralleled the scores typically seen at the end of the previous 2 internship years (P > .25 for all). The proportion of nondesignated and categorical interns pursuing careers in general surgery scoring in the top quartile on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination increased from 7% (2 of 28) to 50% (5 of 10) compared with the previous 2 internship years (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Recent changes in intern duty hours and supervision rules mandate that residency training programs must institute a competency-oriented curriculum to provide interns with the necessary knowledge and practical skills to attain clinical competence.
Authors: Catherine K Allan; Paul Tannous; Elizabeth DeWitt; Michael Farias; Laura Mansfield; Christina Ronai; David Schidlow; Stephen P Sanders; James E Lock; Jane W Newburger; David W Brown Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Scott R Ceresnak; David M Axelrod; Kara S Motonaga; Emily R Johnson; Catherine D Krawczeski Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Scott R Ceresnak; David M Axelrod; Loren D Sacks; Kara S Motonaga; Emily R Johnson; Catherine D Krawczeski Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-02-04 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Vishwanath Hanchanale; Mithun Kailavasan; Sanjay Rajpal; Philip Koenig; Marina Yiasemidou; Victor Palit; Karol Rogawski; Ian Eardley; Tim Terry; Sunjay Jain; Andrew Myatt; Chandra Shekhar Biyani Journal: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn Date: 2018-07-11
Authors: Shane Sinclair; Jane Kondejewski; Priya Jaggi; Liz Dennett; Amanda L Roze des Ordons; Thomas F Hack Journal: Acad Med Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 7.840
Authors: Tess Chase; Divya K Shah; J Preston Parry; Bala Bhagavath; Steven R Lindheim; John C Petrozza; Samantha Pfeifer; Christina Stetter; Allen Kunselman; Stephanie J Estes Journal: F S Rep Date: 2020-09-28