Literature DB >> 23757203

The adaptive nature of eye movements in linguistic tasks: how payoff and architecture shape speed-accuracy trade-offs.

Richard L Lewis1, Michael Shvartsman, Satinder Singh.   

Abstract

We explore the idea that eye-movement strategies in reading are precisely adapted to the joint constraints of task structure, task payoff, and processing architecture. We present a model of saccadic control that separates a parametric control policy space from a parametric machine architecture, the latter based on a small set of assumptions derived from research on eye movements in reading (Engbert, Nuthmann, Richter, & Kliegl, 2005; Reichle, Warren, & McConnell, 2009). The eye-control model is embedded in a decision architecture (a machine and policy space) that is capable of performing a simple linguistic task integrating information across saccades. Model predictions are derived by jointly optimizing the control of eye movements and task decisions under payoffs that quantitatively express different desired speed-accuracy trade-offs. The model yields distinct eye-movement predictions for the same task under different payoffs, including single-fixation durations, frequency effects, accuracy effects, and list position effects, and their modulation by task payoff. The predictions are compared to-and found to accord with-eye-movement data obtained from human participants performing the same task under the same payoffs, but they are found not to accord as well when the assumptions concerning payoff optimization and processing architecture are varied. These results extend work on rational analysis of oculomotor control and adaptation of reading strategy (Bicknell & Levy, ; McConkie, Rayner, & Wilson, 1973; Norris, 2009; Wotschack, 2009) by providing evidence for adaptation at low levels of saccadic control that is shaped by quantitatively varying task demands and the dynamics of processing architecture.
Copyright © 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bounded optimal control; Eye movements; Psycholinguistics; Reading; Speed-accuracy trade-off; Task effects

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23757203     DOI: 10.1111/tops.12032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  6 in total

1.  Ongoing Cognitive Processing Influences Precise Eye-Movement Targets in Reading.

Authors:  Klinton Bicknell; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-02-27

2.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell; Ian Howard; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-14

4.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 5.  Information theory of adaptation in neurons, behavior, and mood.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Adam J Calhoun; Sreekanth H Chalasani
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Dividing Attention Between Tasks: Testing Whether Explicit Payoff Functions Elicit Optimal Dual-Task Performance.

Authors:  George D Farmer; Christian P Janssen; Anh T Nguyen; Duncan P Brumby
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-06-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.