Literature DB >> 23756895

Implementing a QTL detection study (GWAS) using genomic prediction methodology.

Dorian J Garrick1, Rohan L Fernando.   

Abstract

Genomic prediction exploits historical genotypic and phenotypic data to predict performance on selection candidates based only on their genotypes. It achieves this by a process known as training that derives the values of all the chromosome fragments that can be characterized by regressing the historical phenotypes on some or all of the genotyped loci. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) involves a genome-wide search for chromosome fragments with significant association with phenotype. One Bayesian approach to GWAS makes inferences using samples from the posterior distribution of genotypic effects obtained in the training phase of genomic prediction. Here we describe how to do this from commonly used Bayesian methods for genomic prediction, and we comment on how to interpret the results.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23756895     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0_11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  49 in total

1.  The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.

Authors:  Johnna L Baller; Jeremy T Howard; Stephen D Kachman; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Genomic study and Medical Subject Headings enrichment analysis of early pregnancy rate and antral follicle numbers in Nelore heifers.

Authors:  G A Oliveira Júnior; B C Perez; J B Cole; M H A Santana; J Silveira; G Mazzoni; R V Ventura; M L Santana Júnior; H N Kadarmideen; D J Garrick; J B S Ferraz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Large-effect pleiotropic or closely linked QTL segregate within and across ten US cattle breeds.

Authors:  Mahdi Saatchi; Robert D Schnabel; Jeremy F Taylor; Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Genome-wide association study and genomic predictions for exterior traits in Yorkshire pigs1.

Authors:  Jungjae Lee; SeokHyun Lee; Jong-Eun Park; Sung-Ho Moon; Sung-Woon Choi; Gwang-Woong Go; Dajeong Lim; Jun-Mo Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Effects on Lamb Fecal Egg Count Estimated Breeding Values in Progeny-Tested Katahdin Sires.

Authors:  David R Notter; Marzieh Heidaritabar; Joan M Burke; Masoud Shirali; Brenda M Murdoch; James L M Morgan; Gota Morota; Tad S Sonstegard; Gabrielle M Becker; Gordon L Spangler; Michael D MacNeil; James E Miller
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 6.  Application of Bayesian genomic prediction methods to genome-wide association analyses.

Authors:  Anna Wolc; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.100

7.  Genetic relationships of antibody response, viremia level, and weight gain in pigs experimentally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus1.

Authors:  Andrew S Hess; Ben R Trible; Melanie K Hess; Raymond R Rowland; Joan K Lunney; Graham S Plastow; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Copy number variations and genome-wide associations reveal putative genes and metabolic pathways involved with the feed conversion ratio in beef cattle.

Authors:  Miguel Henrique de Almeida Santana; Gerson Antônio Oliveira Junior; Aline Silva Mello Cesar; Mateus Castelani Freua; Rodrigo da Costa Gomes; Saulo da Luz E Silva; Paulo Roberto Leme; Heidge Fukumasu; Minos Esperândio Carvalho; Ricardo Vieira Ventura; Luiz Lehmann Coutinho; Haja N Kadarmideen; José Bento Sterman Ferraz
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomics of response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in purebred and crossbred sows: antibody response and performance following natural infection vs. vaccination.

Authors:  Leticia P Sanglard; Felipe M W Hickmann; Yijian Huang; Kent A Gray; Daniel C L Linhares; Jack C M Dekkers; Megan C Niederwerder; Rohan L Fernando; Joseph Braccini Neto; Nick V L Serão
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens.

Authors:  Anna Wolc; Honghua H Zhao; Jesus Arango; Petek Settar; Janet E Fulton; Neil P O'Sullivan; Rudolf Preisinger; Chris Stricker; David Habier; Rohan L Fernando; Dorian J Garrick; Susan J Lamont; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.