Literature DB >> 29905795

Genetic relationships of antibody response, viremia level, and weight gain in pigs experimentally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus1.

Andrew S Hess1, Ben R Trible2, Melanie K Hess1, Raymond R Rowland2, Joan K Lunney3, Graham S Plastow4, Jack C M Dekkers1.   

Abstract

Genetic and antigenic variability between Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) isolates has encumbered vaccine development. Here, the genetic basis of PRRSV antibody response was assessed using data from experimental infection trials of commercial crossbred weaner pigs across with one of two distinct PRRSV isolates, NVSL-97-7895 (~750 pigs) and KS-2006-72109 (~450 pigs). Objectives were to estimate the genetic parameters of antibody response, measured as the sample to positive ratio (S:P) of PRRSV N-protein specific IgG in serum at 42 d post infection (dpi); assess the relationship of S:P at 42 dpi with serum viremia and growth under infection; and identify genomic regions associated with S:P at 42 dpi. Estimates of heritability of S:P at 42 dpi for NVSL and KS06 were 0.31 ± 0.09 and 0.40 ± 0.10 and appeared to be under similar genetic control (genetic correlation 0.73 ± 0.39). Estimates of genetic correlations of S:P were generally weak with viral load (NVSL: -0.20 ± 0.18; KS06: -0.69 ± 0.20), measured as area under the curve of log10 serum viremia from 0 to 21 dpi, and with weight gain (WG) from 0 to 42 dpi (NVSL: -0.38 ± 0.19; KS06: -0.08 ± 0.25). However, genetic correlations of S:P at 42 dpi with daily serum viremia and with 3-d WG revealed dynamic relationships, with S:P at 42 dpi having the strongest negative genetic correlations with daily viremia when IgG production starts (10-20 dpi), and negative genetic correlations with WG early after infection but positive later on. This suggests that animals that placed more emphasis on immune response early in infection reaped benefits of that later in infection by more effectively clearing the virus. The WUR10000125 SNP on SSC4, previously associated with response to PRRSV, did not have a significant effect on S:P at 42 dpi (P > 0.05) but genotype-specific genetic correlations of S:P with daily viremia and 3-d WG suggested that the lower WG of pigs with the unfavorable AA WUR10000125 genotype may be due to their utilization of a more energetically costly host response compared to pigs with the favorable genotype. Genome-wide association studies identified three SNPs in the Major Histocompatibility Complex associated with S:P that explained ~10 (NVSL) and 45% (KS06) of the genetic variance but were not associated with viremia or WG. In conclusion, antibody response to PRRSV infection is a possible biomarker for improved host response to PRRSV infection.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibody response; genome-wide association study; heritability; major histocompatibility complex; porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29905795      PMCID: PMC6127795          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  59 in total

Review 1.  Selection for high immune response: an alternative approach to animal health maintenance?

Authors:  B Wilkie; B Mallard
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.046

2.  Genome-wide association analysis and genetic architecture of egg weight and egg uniformity in layer chickens.

Authors:  A Wolc; J Arango; P Settar; J E Fulton; N P O'Sullivan; R Preisinger; D Habier; R Fernando; D J Garrick; W G Hill; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Contributions of genomics to life-history theory.

Authors:  Derek A Roff
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Linking immune defenses and life history at the levels of the individual and the species.

Authors:  Kelly A Lee
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 5.  Infection-induced anorexia: active host defence strategy.

Authors:  M S Exton
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Characterization of the humoral immune response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus infection.

Authors:  K J Yoon; J J Zimmerman; S L Swenson; M J McGinley; K A Eernisse; A Brevik; L L Rhinehart; M L Frey; H T Hill; K B Platt
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.279

7.  Development of a fluorescent microsphere immunoassay for detection of antibodies against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus using oral fluid samples as an alternative to serum-based assays.

Authors:  Robert J Langenhorst; Steven Lawson; Apisit Kittawornrat; Jeffrey J Zimmerman; Zhi Sun; Yanhua Li; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Eric A Nelson; Ying Fang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-12-07

8.  Differential immunity in pigs with high and low responses to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection.

Authors:  D B Petry; J Lunney; P Boyd; D Kuhar; E Blankenship; R K Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Identification of a putative quantitative trait nucleotide in guanylate binding protein 5 for host response to PRRS virus infection.

Authors:  James E Koltes; Eric Fritz-Waters; Chris J Eisley; Igseo Choi; Hua Bao; Arun Kommadath; Nick V L Serão; Nicholas J Boddicker; Sam M Abrams; Martine Schroyen; Hyelee Loyd; Chris K Tuggle; Graham S Plastow; Leluo Guan; Paul Stothard; Joan K Lunney; Peng Liu; Susan Carpenter; Robert R R Rowland; Jack C M Dekkers; James M Reecy
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  Antonio M Ramos; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Nabeel A Affara; Andreia J Amaral; Alan L Archibald; Jonathan E Beever; Christian Bendixen; Carol Churcher; Richard Clark; Patrick Dehais; Mark S Hansen; Jakob Hedegaard; Zhi-Liang Hu; Hindrik H Kerstens; Andy S Law; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Denis Milan; Danny J Nonneman; Gary A Rohrer; Max F Rothschild; Tim P L Smith; Robert D Schnabel; Curt P Van Tassell; Jeremy F Taylor; Ralph T Wiedmann; Lawrence B Schook; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genomics of response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in purebred and crossbred sows: antibody response and performance following natural infection vs. vaccination.

Authors:  Leticia P Sanglard; Felipe M W Hickmann; Yijian Huang; Kent A Gray; Daniel C L Linhares; Jack C M Dekkers; Megan C Niederwerder; Rohan L Fernando; Joseph Braccini Neto; Nick V L Serão
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The effect of a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreak on genetic parameters and reaction norms for reproductive performance in pigs1.

Authors:  Austin M Putz; Clint R Schwab; Alysta D Sewell; Derald J Holtkamp; Jeffery J Zimmerman; Kimberlee Baker; Nick V L Serão; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Genomic Analysis of IgG Antibody Response to Common Pathogens in Commercial Sows in Health-Challenged Herds.

Authors:  Leticia P Sanglard; Benny E Mote; Philip Willson; John C S Harding; Graham S Plastow; Jack C M Dekkers; Nick V L Serão
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.