Literature DB >> 2375668

Electromyographic versus rhythmic positional biofeedback in computerized gait retraining with stroke patients.

A R Mandel1, J R Nymark, S J Balmer, D M Grinnell, M D O'Riain.   

Abstract

This research provides a preliminary investigation of the relative efficacy of electromyographic (EMG) versus a novel biofeedback (BFB) approach to improve ankle control and functional gait in stroke patients. A computerized system was designed to provide audiovisual feedback of either muscle activity or ankle position during dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. The novel approach also included rhythmic pacing to emphasize the rapid timing of ankle motion necessary to switch from stance to swing during walking. Thirty-seven subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: (1) no-treatment control, (2) EMG BFB, and (3) rhythmic positional BFB. Blind evaluations of ankle performance, gait, and perceived exertion were performed at regular intervals. Analyses of covariance revealed that subjects receiving rhythmic positional BFB significantly increased their walking speeds relative to other groups at posttest (p = .02) and at three-month follow-up (p = .035), without any increase in subjectively reported energy cost. The ability of positional BFB to emphasize the timing events during walking provided optimistic results for carry-over into gait functioning. The degree of sensorimotor recovery and time since onset of stroke were considered important factors in determining outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2375668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  9 in total

1.  Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation.

Authors:  He Huang; Steven L Wolf; Jiping He
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 2.  Neurorehabilitation of stroke.

Authors:  Sylvan J Albert; Jürg Kesselring
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Ankle dexterity remains intact in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury in contrast to stroke patients.

Authors:  Brigitte Wirth; Hubertus J A van Hedel; Armin Curt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Music interventions for acquired brain injury.

Authors:  Wendy L Magee; Imogen Clark; Jeanette Tamplin; Joke Bradt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-20

5.  Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lars Lünenburger; Gery Colombo; Robert Riener
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 6.  What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Janne Marieke Veerbeek; Erwin van Wegen; Roland van Peppen; Philip Jan van der Wees; Erik Hendriks; Marc Rietberg; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke.

Authors:  H Woodford; C Price
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 8.  Wearable Devices for Biofeedback Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Design Application Rules and Estimate the Effectiveness on Balance and Gait Outcomes in Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Bowman; Elisa Gervasoni; Chiara Arienti; Stefano Giuseppe Lazzarini; Stefano Negrini; Simona Crea; Davide Cattaneo; Maria Chiara Carrozza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Repurposing an EMG Biofeedback Device for Gait Rehabilitation: Development, Validity and Reliability.

Authors:  Reza Koiler; Elham Bakhshipour; Joseph Glutting; Amy Lalime; Dexter Kofa; Nancy Getchell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.