Rachel M Werner1, R Tamara Konetzka, Michelle M Kim. 1. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia VAMC and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. rwerner@upenn.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Changes in resident outcomes may be driven by many factors, including changes in nursing home care processes. Understanding what processes, if any, lead to successful improvements in resident outcomes could create a stronger case for the continued use of these outcome measures in nursing home report cards. OBJECTIVE: To test the extent to which improvements in outcomes of care are explained by changes in nursing home processes, a setting where, to our knowledge, this link has not been previously studied. RESEARCH DESIGN/MEASURES: We describe facility-level changes in resident processes and outcomes before and after outcomes were publicly reported. We then assess the extent to which the changes in outcomes are associated with changes in nursing home processes of care, using the public release of information on nursing home outcomes as a source of variation in nursing home outcomes to identify the process-outcome relationship. SUBJECTS: All 16,623 US nursing homes included in public reporting from 2000 to 2009 in Online Survey, Certification and Reporting and the nursing home Minimum Data Set. RESULTS: Of the 5 outcome measures examined, only improvements in the percentage of nursing home residents in moderate or severe pain were associated with changes in nursing home processes of care. Furthermore, these changes in the measured process of care explained only a small part of the overall improvement in pain prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: A large portion of the improvements in nursing home outcomes were not associated with changes in measured processes of care suggesting that processes of care typically measured in nursing homes do little to improve nursing home performance on outcome measures. Developing quality measures that are related improved patient outcomes would likely benefit quality improvement. Understanding the mechanism behind improvements in nursing home outcomes is key to successfully achieving broad quality improvements across nursing homes.
BACKGROUND: Changes in resident outcomes may be driven by many factors, including changes in nursing home care processes. Understanding what processes, if any, lead to successful improvements in resident outcomes could create a stronger case for the continued use of these outcome measures in nursing home report cards. OBJECTIVE: To test the extent to which improvements in outcomes of care are explained by changes in nursing home processes, a setting where, to our knowledge, this link has not been previously studied. RESEARCH DESIGN/MEASURES: We describe facility-level changes in resident processes and outcomes before and after outcomes were publicly reported. We then assess the extent to which the changes in outcomes are associated with changes in nursing home processes of care, using the public release of information on nursing home outcomes as a source of variation in nursing home outcomes to identify the process-outcome relationship. SUBJECTS: All 16,623 US nursing homes included in public reporting from 2000 to 2009 in Online Survey, Certification and Reporting and the nursing home Minimum Data Set. RESULTS: Of the 5 outcome measures examined, only improvements in the percentage of nursing home residents in moderate or severe pain were associated with changes in nursing home processes of care. Furthermore, these changes in the measured process of care explained only a small part of the overall improvement in pain prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: A large portion of the improvements in nursing home outcomes were not associated with changes in measured processes of care suggesting that processes of care typically measured in nursing homes do little to improve nursing home performance on outcome measures. Developing quality measures that are related improved patient outcomes would likely benefit quality improvement. Understanding the mechanism behind improvements in nursing home outcomes is key to successfully achieving broad quality improvements across nursing homes.
Authors: Rosa R Baier; David R Gifford; Gail Patry; Sara M Banks; Therese Rochon; Debra DeSilva; Joan M Teno Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Nancy Bergstrom; Susan D Horn; Randall J Smout; Stacy A Bender; Maree L Ferguson; George Taler; Abby C Sauer; Siohban S Sharkey; Anne Coble Voss Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Dana B Mukamel; Laurent G Glance; Yue Li; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn; Laura Mosqueda Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Jeph Herrin; Brian Elbel; Robert L McNamara; David J Magid; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Yongfei Wang; Sharon-Lise T Normand; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bruce E Landon; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Tracy A Lieu; Thomas Keegan; Barbara J McNeil; Edward Guadagnoli Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carol M Mangione; Robert B Gerzoff; David F Williamson; W Neil Steers; Eve A Kerr; Arleen F Brown; Beth E Waitzfelder; David G Marrero; R Adams Dudley; Catherine Kim; William Herman; Theodore J Thompson; Monika M Safford; Joe V Selby Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Heather Ladd; Jacqueline S Zinn Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Nina R Joyce; Thomas G McGuire; Stephen J Bartels; Susan L Mitchell; David C Grabowski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Whitney L Mills; Camilla B Pimentel; Jennifer A Palmer; A Lynn Snow; Nancy J Wewiorski; Rebecca S Allen; Christine W Hartmann Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2018-05-08
Authors: Lona Mody; Jennifer Meddings; Barbara S Edson; Sara E McNamara; Barbara W Trautner; Nimalie D Stone; Sarah L Krein; Sanjay Saint Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Paul R Katz; Kira Ryskina; Debra Saliba; Andrew Costa; Hye-Young Jung; Laura M Wagner; Mark Aaron Unruh; Benjamin J Smith; Andrea Moser; Joanne Spetz; Sid Feldman; Jurgis Karuza Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2021-06-02
Authors: Juh Hyun Shin; Rosemary Anne Renaut; Mark Reiser; Ji Yeon Lee; Ty Yi Tang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.390