Literature DB >> 23756442

Clarifying assent in pediatric research.

Noor A A Giesbertz1, Annelien L Bredenoord1, Johannes J M van Delden1.   

Abstract

Assent is a relatively young term in research ethics, but became an often mentioned ethical requirement in current pediatric research guidelines. Also, the European Society of Human Genetics considers assent an important condition for the inclusion of children in biobanks. However, although many emphasize the importance of assent, few explain how they understand the concept and few have elaborated on the underlying grounds. In this paper, we will discuss the different underlying ethical principles of assent. In the first category, assent appears to be derived from informed consent. This understanding is grounded in respect for autonomy and protection against harm. We conclude that this interpretation of assent is not of added value as a majority of children cannot be considered competent to make autonomous decisions. In addition, other safeguards are more appropriate to protect children against harm. The grounds from the second category can be classified as engagement grounds. These grounds do justice to the specifics of childhood and are of added value. Furthermore, we argue that it follows that both the content and the process of assent should be adjusted to the individual child. This can be referred to as personalized assent. Personalized assent is an appeal to the moral responsibility and integrity of the researcher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23756442      PMCID: PMC3895639          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  53 in total

1.  Children's consent to research participation: social context and personal experience invalidate fixed cutoff rules.

Authors:  Richard Ashcroft; Trudy Goodenough; Emma Williamson; Julie Kent
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Moral responsiveness in pediatric research ethics.

Authors:  Carol J Moeller
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Dissent about assent in paediatric research.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  Differences in molecular genetics between pediatric and adult malignant astrocytomas: age matters.

Authors:  Stephen W Gilheeney; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.404

5.  A new understanding of consent in pediatric practice: consent, parental permission, and child assent.

Authors:  W G Bartholome
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.132

6.  In defense of a child's right to assent.

Authors:  W G Bartholome
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Unrecognized or potential risk factors for childhood cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas A Van Larebeke; Linda S Birnbaum; Marc A Boogaerts; Marc Bracke; Devra Lee Davis; David M Demarini; Kim Hooper; James Huff; Jos C Kleinjans; Marvin S Legator; Greet Schoeters; Kirsi Vähäkangas
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun

8.  Child assent and parental permission in pediatric research.

Authors:  Wilma C Rossi; William Reynolds; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003

9.  Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Rethinking pediatric assent: from requirement to ideal.

Authors:  Yoram Unguru; Max J Coppes; Naynesh Kamani
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.278

View more
  20 in total

1.  Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Denise Avard; Karine Sénécal; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Is a requirement of personalised assent realistic? A case from the GABRIEL project.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Reply to Waligora.

Authors:  Noor A A Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Management and return of incidental genomic findings in clinical trials.

Authors:  C Ayuso; J M Millan; R Dal-Re
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.

Authors:  Omar F Khabour; Mahmoud A Alomari; Nihaya A Al-Sheyab
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Ethical considerations of researchers conducting pediatric clinical drug trials: a qualitative survey in two Belgian university children's hospitals.

Authors:  Wannes Van Hoof; Kevin Meesters; Lien Dossche; Daphné Christiaens; Pauline De Bruyne; Johan Vande Walle
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 7.  Age-Appropriate Advance Care Planning in Children Diagnosed with a Life-Limiting Condition: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julie Brunetta; Jurrianne Fahner; Monique Legemaat; Esther van den Bergh; Koen Krommenhoek; Kyra Prinsze; Marijke Kars; Erna Michiels
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03

8.  Sharing and Safeguarding Pediatric Data.

Authors:  Dimitri Patrinos; Bartha Maria Knoppers; David P Laplante; Noriyeh Rahbari; Ashley Wazana
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 9.  Understanding Ethical Issues of Research Participation From the Perspective of Participating Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stacey Crane; Marion E Broome
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks.

Authors:  Noor Aa Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes Jm van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.