Literature DB >> 23754635

Natural selection in utero: evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake.

R Catalano1, T Yorifuji, I Kawachi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Controversy remains over whether declines in male births reported after population stressors result from either or both reduced conception of males or increased selection in utero against male fetuses. We use monthly birth cohorts to determine if Japanese male births following the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 fell below levels expected from female births and from history (i.e., autocorrelation) among cohorts exposed to the Earthquake at or after conception.
METHODS: We apply interrupted time-series methods to 69 months (i.e., April, 2006 through December, 2011) of birth data from the most and least affected prefectures as well as from the remainder of Japan. We estimate expected male births from female births and from autocorrelation.
RESULTS: Findings varied by distance from the greatest damage but suggest sensitive periods both early and late in gestation when population stressors may induce selection against males in utero. Support for reduced conception of males appeared only in the prefectures most damaged by the Earthquake.
CONCLUSIONS: Results align with the claim that natural selection has conserved mechanisms that reduce the odds of a male live birth during stressful times by reducing the conception of males and by increasing the rate of spontaneous abortion among male fetuses.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23754635     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  13 in total

1.  Secondary sex ratio in regions severely exposed to methylmercury "Minamata disease".

Authors:  Takashi Yorifuji; Saori Kashima
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Birth outcomes following unexpected job loss: a matched-sibling design.

Authors:  Samantha Gailey; Elias Stapput Knudsen; Laust H Mortensen; Tim A Bruckner
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 9.685

Review 3.  Maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy alters the epigenetic signature of the glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in their offspring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Palma-Gudiel; A Córdova-Palomera; E Eixarch; M Deuschle; L Fañanás
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

4.  Sex ratios at birth after induced abortion.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Rahim Moineddin; Prabhat Jha; Patricia J O'Campo; Kwame McKenzie; Richard H Glazier; David A Henry; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Foetal loss and feminine sex ratios at birth in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Anne Morse; Nancy Luke
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2021-02-18

Review 6.  Selection in utero and population health: Theory and typology of research.

Authors:  Tim A Bruckner; Ralph Catalano
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-06-02

7.  Does the Mother or Father Determine the Offspring Sex Ratio? Investigating the Relationship between Maternal Digit Ratio and Offspring Sex Ratio.

Authors:  Tae Beom Kim; Jin Kyu Oh; Kwang Taek Kim; Sang Jin Yoon; Soo Woong Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of the Great East Japan Earthquake on Secondary Sex Ratio and Perinatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Kohta Suzuki; Zentaro Yamagata; Miyuki Kawado; Shuji Hashimoto
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 3.211

9.  Can Sibling Sex Ratios Be Used as a Valid Test for the Prenatal Androgen Hypothesis of Autism Spectrum Disorders?

Authors:  Keely Cheslack-Postava; Ezra Susser; Kayuet Liu; Peter S Bearman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Socioeconomic status influences sex ratios in a Chinese rural population.

Authors:  Liqun Luo; Rui Ding; Xiali Gao; Jingjing Sun; Wei Zhao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.