PURPOSE: Surface transmit arrays used in ultra-high field body MRI require local specific absorption rate (SAR) assessment. As local SAR cannot be measured directly, local SAR is determined by simulations using dielectric patient models. In this study, the inter-patient local SAR variation is investigated for 7T prostate imaging with the single-side adapted dipole antenna array. METHOD: Four-dedicated dielectric models were created by segmenting Dixon water-fat separated images that were obtained from four subjects with a 1.5T scanner and the surface array in place. Electromagnetic simulations were performed to calculate the SAR distribution for each model. Radio frequency (RF) exposure variations were determined by analyzing the SAR(10g) distributions (1) with one element active, (2) using a Q-matrix eigenvalue/eigenvector approach, (3) with the maximum potential SAR in each voxel, and (4) for a phase shimmed prostate measurement. RESULTS: Maximum potential local SAR levels for 1 W time-averaged accepted power per transmit channel range from 4.1 to 7.1 W/kg. CONCLUSION: These variations show that one model is not sufficient to determine safe scan settings. For the operation of the surface array conservative power settings were derived based on a worst-case SAR evaluation and the most SAR-sensitive body model.
PURPOSE: Surface transmit arrays used in ultra-high field body MRI require local specific absorption rate (SAR) assessment. As local SAR cannot be measured directly, local SAR is determined by simulations using dielectric patient models. In this study, the inter-patient local SAR variation is investigated for 7T prostate imaging with the single-side adapted dipole antenna array. METHOD: Four-dedicated dielectric models were created by segmenting Dixon water-fat separated images that were obtained from four subjects with a 1.5T scanner and the surface array in place. Electromagnetic simulations were performed to calculate the SAR distribution for each model. Radio frequency (RF) exposure variations were determined by analyzing the SAR(10g) distributions (1) with one element active, (2) using a Q-matrix eigenvalue/eigenvector approach, (3) with the maximum potential SAR in each voxel, and (4) for a phase shimmed prostate measurement. RESULTS: Maximum potential local SAR levels for 1 W time-averaged accepted power per transmit channel range from 4.1 to 7.1 W/kg. CONCLUSION: These variations show that one model is not sufficient to determine safe scan settings. For the operation of the surface array conservative power settings were derived based on a worst-case SAR evaluation and the most SAR-sensitive body model.
Authors: Ettore Flavio Meliadò; Alessandro Sbrizzi; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Peter R Luijten; Alexander J E Raaijmakers Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kamil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Andrea Grant; Edward J Auerbach; Arcan Ertürk; Russell Lagore; Jutta M Ellermann; Xiaoxuan He; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 2.266
Authors: Bart R Steensma; Ettore F Meliadò; Peter Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Alexander J E Raaijmakers Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Anneloes de Boer; Johannes M Hoogduin; Peter J Blankestijn; Xiufeng Li; Peter R Luijten; Gregory J Metzger; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Lale Umutlu; Fredy Visser; Tim Leiner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 2.310