A major limitation of biopharmaceutical proteins is their fast clearance from circulation via kidney filtration, which strongly hampers efficacy both in animal studies and in human therapy. We have developed conformationally disordered polypeptide chains with expanded hydrodynamic volume comprising the small residues Pro, Ala and Ser (PAS). PAS sequences are hydrophilic, uncharged biological polymers with biophysical properties very similar to poly-ethylene glycol (PEG), whose chemical conjugation to drugs is an established method for plasma half-life extension. In contrast, PAS polypeptides offer fusion to a therapeutic protein on the genetic level, permitting Escherichia coli production of fully active proteins and obviating in vitro coupling or modification steps. Furthermore, they are biodegradable, thus avoiding organ accumulation, while showing stability in serum and lacking toxicity or immunogenicity in mice. We demonstrate that PASylation bestows typical biologics, such as interferon, growth hormone or Fab fragments, with considerably prolonged circulation and boosts bioactivity in vivo.
A major limitation of biopharmaceutical proteins is their fast clearance from circulation via kidney filtration, which strongly hampers efficacy both in animal studies and in human therapy. We have developed conformationally disordered polypeptide chains with expanded hydrodynamic volume comprising the small residues Pro, Ala and Ser (PAS). PAS sequences are hydrophilic, uncharged biological polymers with biophysical properties very similar to poly-ethylene glycol (PEG), whose chemical conjugation to drugs is an established method for plasma half-life extension. In contrast, PAS polypeptides offer fusion to a therapeutic protein on the genetic level, permitting Escherichia coli production of fully active proteins and obviating in vitro coupling or modification steps. Furthermore, they are biodegradable, thus avoiding organ accumulation, while showing stability in serum and lacking toxicity or immunogenicity in mice. We demonstrate that PASylation bestows typical biologics, such as interferon, growth hormone or Fab fragments, with considerably prolonged circulation and boosts bioactivity in vivo.
Entities:
Keywords:
biologic; dosing; kidney filtration; pharmacokinetics; therapeutic protein
Short plasma half-life in humans of just a few hours after intravenous (i.v.) bolus
injection is a typical feature of almost all biopharmaceuticals (Kontermann, 2012), or corresponding drug
candidates, with renal clearance providing the predominant route of fast
elimination. According to the rules of allometric scaling (Mahmood, 2005) this translates into loss from circulation
already few minutes after application to mice—the preferred laboratory
animal—which is often insufficient to achieve a solid pharmacodynamic (PD)
effect and constitutes a major handicap for preclinical drug development. A
remarkable exception are intact IgG antibodies, which show a half-life of 1–3
weeks in humans (Lobo ) and 6–8 days in mice (Vieira and Rajewsky, 1988; Milenic
), owing to their large size as well asFcRn-mediated endosomal recycling (Roopenian
and Akilesh, 2007).PEGylation, i.e. chemical coupling with the syntheticpolymerpoly-ethylene glycol
(PEG), has emerged as an accepted technology for the development of biologics that
exercise prolonged action, with around 10 clinically approved protein and peptide
drugs to date (Jevsevar ). PEG forms a highly solvated, structurally
disordered random chain in aqueous solution which, if conjugated, leads to an
expanded hydrodynamic volume for the pharmaceutically active biomolecule and,
consequently, to strongly retarded glomerular filtration. This phenomenon depends on
the length of the PEG chain and is essentially based on a pure biophysical size
effect (Pasut and Veronese, 2007).While conceptionally simple and effective at first glance, PEGylation shows a growing
number of drawbacks (Gaberc-Porekar ; Knop
) that not only hamper clinical drug as
well as bioprocess development but also limit its applicability for drug discovery
and biomedical research: (i) the necessity of chemical in vitro
coupling and corresponding modification that has to be made to the protein of
interest; (ii) the frequent loss in bioactivity of the biological; (iii) the high
cost and inherent polydispersity of commercially available activated PEG derivatives
and associated difficulties in product analysis; (iv) the poor bioavailability of
subcutaneously (s.c.) administered PEGylated proteins due to the waxy behavior of
highly concentrated solutions; (v) accumulating evidence on the immunogenicity of
PEG (Garay ); and (vi) the lacking biodegradability of the unnatural PEGpolymer, which can lead to tissue accumulation such asrenal tubular vacuolation
(Bendele ).In particular, the chemical coupling procedure for PEG is a delicate step, which
requires profound knowledge of protein chemistry and often involves laborious
optimization. While coupling to Lys side chains via
N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-activated PEG compounds is technically
straightforward, it results in poorly defined product mixtures (Foser ),
both in terms of coupling stoichiometry and of site-specificity, and often leads to
impaired activity (Bailon ) (i.e. reduced affinity for the receptor or
target). Site-specific coupling, on the other hand, requires the introduction of a
unique reactive side chain into the protein of interest, usually a Cys residue,
which involves extensive positional optimization (Rosendahl ) in order to
preserve functional activity and prevent interference with intrinsic disulfide
bonds, which are present in most therapeutic proteins of interest. In fact, this
kind of initial protein modification together with the subsequent PEG coupling step
usually lowers the product yield by a considerable extent.In search for a biological alternative to PEGylation, we designed genetically
encodable amino acid sequences that form a natively unstructured polypeptide chain
with high solubility and, importantly, lack of charges, thus offering comparable
biophysical properties asPEG. Initially, we investigated Gly-based polypeptides
(Schlapschy ) which, as expected, exhibited random conformation as part of fusion
proteins—e.g. with a recombinant Fab fragment—and led to an enlarged
hydrodynamic volume. However, despite detectably prolonged circulation in mice, the
half-life extending effect of these Gly-rich sequences with lengths up to 200
residues appeared too low for most biomedical applications whereas their inherently
limited solubility prevented the preparation of longer chains.Since homo-polymers of other small amino acids are known to adopt secondary structure
instead of a random coil (Schlapschy
), we subsequently explored combinations
of different residues. Surprisingly, we found that sequences comprising the three
small amino acids Pro, Ala and Ser (PAS) allow the efficient biosynthesis of long
hydrophilic and highly soluble polypeptide chains exhibiting properties remarkably
similar to PEG (Fig. 1). Here, we
describe the preparation of genetic conjugates with several types of therapeutic
proteins as well as their biochemical and biophysical characterization, and we
demonstrate the strong effect of PASylation with regard to prolonged
pharmacokinetics (PK) and enhanced in vivo activity.
Fig. 1.
Concept of PASylation. (A) Modelled structure of the
PASylated Fab fragment of an antibody. Both Ig chains are colored red
whereas the antigen-binding site is shown in black. Twenty-four
arbitrarily selected random conformations of the PAS polypeptide tag at
the C-terminus of the light chain are presented as
snapshots and shown in different shades of grey in order to illustrate
the fluctuating random coil-like, space-filling behavior.
(B) Comparison of the chemical composition between the
synthetic linear polymer PEG (potentially carrying a reactive group
R′ at the left end) with its hydrophilic ether oxygen bridges and
an unfolded biological polypeptide with its polar peptide groups (side
chains abbreviated with R). (C) Nucleotide and encoded
amino acid sequences of the building blocks for PAS#1,
PAS#1P2 and PAS#5 gene cassettes obtained by hybridization
of two complementary oligodeoxynucleotides, giving rise to two
non-palindromic sticky ends that can be mutually ligated or cloned via a
SapI restriction site. (D) Schematic
representation of expression cassettes on the plasmids used in this
study with coding elements and singular restriction sites indicated. All
genes are under control of the chemically inducible
tetp/o while the vector backbone
corresponds to pASK75 (Skerra,
1994).
Concept of PASylation. (A) Modelled structure of the
PASylated Fab fragment of an antibody. Both Ig chains are colored red
whereas the antigen-binding site is shown in black. Twenty-four
arbitrarily selected random conformations of the PAS polypeptide tag at
the C-terminus of the light chain are presented as
snapshots and shown in different shades of grey in order to illustrate
the fluctuating random coil-like, space-filling behavior.
(B) Comparison of the chemical composition between the
synthetic linear polymerPEG (potentially carrying a reactive group
R′ at the left end) with its hydrophilic ether oxygen bridges and
an unfolded biological polypeptide with its polar peptide groups (side
chains abbreviated with R). (C) Nucleotide and encoded
amino acid sequences of the building blocks for PAS#1,
PAS#1P2 and PAS#5 gene cassettes obtained by hybridization
of two complementary oligodeoxynucleotides, giving rise to two
non-palindromic sticky ends that can be mutually ligated or cloned via a
SapI restriction site. (D) Schematic
representation of expression cassettes on the plasmids used in this
study with coding elements and singular restriction sites indicated. All
genes are under control of the chemically inducible
tetp/o while the vector backbone
corresponds to pASK75 (Skerra,
1994).
Results
Design of PAS sequences and corresponding gene cassettes
Our concept for the design of polypeptides with PEG-like properties such as, in
particular, large hydrodynamic volume, high solubility, and lack of charges was
based on a hypothetical l-α-amino acid sequence whose backbone
should adopt robust random chain conformation in aqueous solution and at ambient
or body temperature and whose side chains have low tendency to form
intermolecular interactions other than with solvent molecules. To achieve this
objective, all natural amino acids with hydrophobic or charged side chains had
to be neglected. Of the remaining hydrophilic amino acids, those with
carboxamide side chains, i.e. Asn and Gln, were excluded because of their known
tendency to form aggregates and their role in protein folding pathologies, for
example, Huntington's disease (Furukawa ). Furthermore, the
β-branched amino acid Thr was omitted due to its pronounced
β-sheet propensity while His with its imidazole side chain was rejected
because of its basic behavior and metal-ion binding capacity. Finally, the
smallest amino acid, Gly, was avoided on the grounds of its poor solubility with
increasing chain length and its generally compacting effect on the random coil
structure of unfolded polypeptides (Cantor
and Schimmel, 1980).Consequently, only the three small amino acids Ala, Ser and Pro, which all are
fairly hydrophilic—with octanol/water partition coefficients close to the
side chain lacking reference amino acid Gly (Creighton, 1993)—remained as a preferred set of
building blocks. Notably, however, homo-polymers of each of these amino acids
are known to form stable secondary structures: α-helix in the case of Ala
(Shental-Bechor ), β-sheet in the case of Ser (Quadrifoglio and Urry, 1968) and a
type II trans helix (Stapley and Creamer, 1999) in the case of poly-Pro. Nevertheless, we
speculated that appropriate mixtures thereof might form the aspired random coil
polypeptides for two reasons: first, the individually differing secondary
structure propensities of Pro, Ala and Ser should cancel out each other and,
second, the imino acid Pro is well known for its N-terminal
cis/trans isomerization (Yaron and Naider, 1993) which
provides an additional degree of freedom and raises the conformational entropy
of the unfolded polypeptide backbone. Finally, we took care that the genetically
defined PAS sequences exhibited an erratic order (Fig. 1C), thus avoiding two-, three- or
four-residue repeats as they typically occur in secondary structures such as
β-sheet, α-helix or the collagen triple helix (Creighton, 1993).Employing some of the resulting sequence motifs, we designed suitable gene
cassettes using highly translated Escherichia coli codons. To
this end, pairs of complementary oligodeoxynucleotides (typically encoding a 20-
or 24-residue stretch) that upon hybridization lead to two 5′-protruding,
non-palindromic three-nucleotide overhangs—corresponding to an Ala codon
(GCC)—were subjected to unidirectional ligation (Fig. 1C). In this way longer synthetic gene
fragments (Schlapschy ), typically encoding 200 or 192 residues, were
obtained and subcloned on a suitable vector for sequence verification and
further use. With this repetitive design uniform biophysical properties along
the entire PAS polypeptide were maintained, in spite of the non-periodic
sequence within each short minimal cassette.
Functional production of biomedically relevant PAS fusion proteins in
E.coli
To investigate the biophysical properties of PAS amino acid sequences and their
effects on plasma half-life in vivo, three model proteins
representing different fold types were chosen: (i) a recombinant Fab fragment of
the humanized anti-HER2 antibody 4D5 (trastuzumab, Carter ; Fab), (ii) human
interferon α2b (Borden ; IFN), and (iii) humangrowth hormone
(somatropin, Franklin and Geffner,
2009; hGH).In case of the 4D5 Fab fragment the PAS polypeptides #1 and #5 were
fused to the C-terminus of the immunoglobulin (Ig) light chain,
similarly as previously described for the Gly-rich sequences (Schlapschy ). Using a plasmid for the periplasmic secretion of the Fab
fragment, on which the heavy chain fragment was equipped with a
His6-tag, the Strep-tag II was appended to the
C-terminus of the light chain and a single type IIS
SapI restriction site (generating a sticky end
corresponding to an Ala codon, see above) was introduced in between, right
downstream of the C-terminal Cys residue of the
Cκ domain (Fig. 1D). The gene cassettes for the PAS polypeptides #1 and
#5 were then inserted. As a consequence of this cloning strategy, the
restriction site at the downstream end of the inserted PAS(200) cassette was
lost whereas the one at the upstream end was retained, subsequently allowing
insertion of additional cassettes in a consecutive manner, thus yielding
PAS(400), PAS(600) or even longer fusion proteins.In another strategy, a second SapI restriction site was
introduced directly downstream of the C-terminal Cys residue of
the CH1 domain. Thus, after insertion of a second PAS(200) gene
cassette, a Fab fragment with two separate PAS tags was prepared (dubbed duoPAS
Fab), each at the C-termini of its light and heavy chains
(Fig. 1D), in effect
resembling a branched PEG chain (Jevsevar
). Finally, for comparison, a
conventionally PEGylated Fab fragment was prepared via site-specific maleimide
coupling of branched PEG(20)2 to a free Cys residue at the
C-terminus of the light chain.All Fab-PAS fusion proteins were produced in E.coli via
periplasmic secretion in a soluble state and purified by means of
His6-tag and Strep-tag II as well as size
exclusion chromatography (SEC), resulting in homogeneous functional protein
preparations (Fig. 2). In all
Fab constructs the interchain disulfide bridge was properly formed, with
≥95% covalent linkage between light and heavy chains, hence
indicating no steric hindrance in Ig chain association due to the presence of
the voluminous PAS tag, even for the duoPAS Fab format. Interestingly, those
chains fused with the PAS tag revealed a drastically reduced electrophoretic
mobility in sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS–PAGE) depending on the polymer length: e.g. the light chain fused
with PAS(200) migrated at ∼70 kDa compared with a calculated mass of 41.4
kDa, while a PAS(400) tag led to an apparent size of 150 kDa (calc. 57.9 kDa).
This behavior indicates reduced binding of SDS which normally provides the
electrophoretic driving force with its negatively charged sulfate head group.
Furthermore, with increasing PAS polypeptide length the protein band showed less
efficient Coomassie staining, in line with the absence of hydrophobic and/or
basic residues that otherwise are responsible for binding of this dye (Georgiou ). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) confirmed
in each case the expected molecular mass and, notably, monodisperse composition,
without indication of prematurely terminated gene products (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Fig. 2.
Biochemical and biophysical analysis of PAS fusion proteins.
(A) Analysis of the recombinant 4D5 Fab fragment
and its PASylated versions, all purified from the periplasmic cell
fraction of E.coli, by Coomassie-stained 12%
SDS–PAGE. Lane 1, the original Fab fragment; lanes
2–4, its fusions with PAS#1(200), PAS#1(400)
and PAS#1(600), respectively; lane 5, the Fab fragment
carrying a PAS#1(200) polymer at both of its light and heavy
chains. Samples on the right are the same but were not reduced with
2-mercaptoethanol. (B) Analysis of recombinant IFN and
its PASylated versions as in (A). Lane 1, original IFN; lanes
2–4, its fusions with PAS#1(200), PAS#1(400)
and PAS#1(600), respectively. (C) Isoelectric
focussing (IEF) of IFN and PAS#1(600)-IFN. Lane M, IEF marker
proteins; lane 1, recombinant IFN; lane 2, PAS#1(600)-IFN.
Both proteins show single bands at almost the same position
corresponding to pH ∼6.6, in line with the calculated
pI of 6.51 for IFN. (D) Analysis
of hydrodynamic volume for the purified recombinant Fab fragment and
its PASylated versions by SEC (peaks normalized). Two hundred and
fifty microliters (250 µl) of each protein at a concentration
of 0.25 mg/ml was applied to a Superdex S200 10/300 GL column
equilibrated with PBS. The arrow indicates the void volume of the
column (7.8 ml). (E) Analytical SEC of IFN and its
PASylated versions as in (D). (F) CD spectra of IFN and
its PASylated versions. Spectra were recorded at room temperature in
50 mM K2SO4, 20 mM K-Pi pH 7.5
using a 0.01 cm quartz cuvette and normalized to the molar
ellipticity (ΘM) for each protein.
(G) Molar difference CD spectra for the PASylated IFN
versions with 200, 400 and 600 residues obtained by subtracting the
spectrum of the original IFN from (F).
Biochemical and biophysical analysis of PAS fusion proteins.
(A) Analysis of the recombinant 4D5 Fab fragment
and its PASylated versions, all purified from the periplasmic cell
fraction of E.coli, by Coomassie-stained 12%
SDS–PAGE. Lane 1, the original Fab fragment; lanes
2–4, its fusions with PAS#1(200), PAS#1(400)
and PAS#1(600), respectively; lane 5, the Fab fragment
carrying a PAS#1(200) polymer at both of its light and heavy
chains. Samples on the right are the same but were not reduced with
2-mercaptoethanol. (B) Analysis of recombinant IFN and
its PASylated versions as in (A). Lane 1, original IFN; lanes
2–4, its fusions with PAS#1(200), PAS#1(400)
and PAS#1(600), respectively. (C) Isoelectric
focussing (IEF) of IFN and PAS#1(600)-IFN. Lane M, IEF marker
proteins; lane 1, recombinant IFN; lane 2, PAS#1(600)-IFN.
Both proteins show single bands at almost the same position
corresponding to pH ∼6.6, in line with the calculated
pI of 6.51 for IFN. (D) Analysis
of hydrodynamic volume for the purified recombinant Fab fragment and
its PASylated versions by SEC (peaks normalized). Two hundred and
fifty microliters (250 µl) of each protein at a concentration
of 0.25 mg/ml was applied to a Superdex S200 10/300 GL column
equilibrated with PBS. The arrow indicates the void volume of the
column (7.8 ml). (E) Analytical SEC of IFN and its
PASylated versions as in (D). (F) CD spectra of IFN and
its PASylated versions. Spectra were recorded at room temperature in
50 mM K2SO4, 20 mM K-Pi pH 7.5
using a 0.01 cm quartz cuvette and normalized to the molar
ellipticity (ΘM) for each protein.
(G) Molar difference CD spectra for the PASylated IFN
versions with 200, 400 and 600 residues obtained by subtracting the
spectrum of the original IFN from (F).In case of IFN and hGH the PAS polypeptide was fused to the
N-termini of the therapeutic proteins. Using a single
SapI restriction site between the
N-terminal Strep-tag II and IFN or between the
His6-tag and hGH, individual 200-residue PAS gene cassettes were
inserted in a consecutive manner as described above (Fig. 1D). Both proteins fused with PAS tags
of up to 600 residues were again produced in E.coli via
periplasmic secretion, to ensure proper disulfide bond formation, and purified
to homogeneity as above. During SDS–PAGE analysis a similar retarding
effect of PASylation on the electrophoretic mobility was observed as for the Fab
(Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. S2).
Biophysical properties: hydrodynamic volume and secondary structure analysis
of PAS fusion proteins
The biophysical properties of the PAS polypeptides were first characterized with
the 4D5 Fab and IFN (having native molecular masses of 48.0 and 21.0 kDa,
respectively). The effect of the PAS#1 polypeptide on the hydrodynamic
volume of corresponding fusion proteins was quantitatively analyzed by SEC. For
each of the purified PASylated Fab fragments a single homogenous elution peak
was observed (Fig. 2D).
Notably, the elution volume strongly decreased with increasing length of the
polymer (Table I), leading
to an apparent molecular size of up to 691 kDa for the PAS#1(600) Fab
(calc. 99.0 kDa). Thus, although the real increase in mass upon PASylation of
the recombinant Fab fragment was just 51 kDa the apparent mass increase was 660
kDa, i.e. 22-fold. This observation clearly indicates the massive effect of a
larger hydrodynamic volume that has to be expected if the appended PAS
polypeptide assumes random coil structure (Squire, 1981). In comparison, the Fab-PEG(20)2 (with a
calculated mass of 88.1 kDa) showed an apparent mass of 478 kDa, which was
significantly lower and actually closer to the one of the linear
PAS#1(400) Fab with an apparent mass of 451 kDa (calc. 82.5 kDa).
Comparable results were obtained for PASylated IFN (Fig. 2E). In this case the apparent
molecular size of the PAS#1(600) fusion protein was 610 kDa,
corresponding to an increase in hydrodynamic volume by a factor 26 due to the
attached random coil polypeptide.
Table I.
Biophysical and in vivo murine PK data of
PASylated proteins
Protein sample
Mass (kDa)
SEC size (kDa)
(h)
AUC (h μg ml−1)
CL (ml h−1
kg−1)
PK factor
kon (M−1
s−1)
koff (s−1)
KD (nM)
Fab
48.0
31
1.34
17.03
293.56
1
7.63 × 105
8.72 × 10−5
0.114 ± 0.009
Fab-PAS#1(100)
56.5
117.3
2.71
123.39
40.52
2.0
–
–
–
Fab-PAS#1(200)
66.0
219
5.20
254.78
19.63
3.9
2.68 x 105
2.90 × 10−5
0.108 ± 0.009
Fab-PAS#1(400)
82.5
451
14.38
870.31
5.75
10.7
1.48 × 105
2.51 × 10−5
0.170 ± 0.017
Fab-PAS#1(600)
99.0
691
28.19
1751.36
2.85
21.0
1.08 × 105
2.63 × 10−5
0.244 ± 0.015
Fab-2xPAS#1(200)
82.7
449
37.22
2915.36
1.72
27.8
1.22 × 105
4.48 × 10−5
0.367 ± 0.020
Fab-ABD
53.3
40.1
28.92
2376.35
2.10
21.6
–
–
–
Fab-PEG(20)2
88.1
478
35.33
2726.88
1.83
26.4
1.63 × 105
3.22 × 10−5
0.198 ± 0.016
IFN
21.0
23.7
0.54
12.62
396.25
1
3.32 × 106
7.89 × 10−3
2.37 ± 0.02
PAS#1(200)-IFN
37.4
190
2.64
111.05
45.03
4.9
1.28 × 106
11.8 × 10−3
9.25 ± 0.06
PAS#1(400)-IFN
54.0
416
7.90
451.52
11.07
14.6
1.47 × 106
13.3 × 10−3
9.01 ± 0.05
PAS#1(600)-IFN
70.5
610
15.85
1171.15
4.27
29.4
1.46 × 106
13.1 × 10−3
8.99 ± 0.06
PEG-IFN
59.2
–
–
–
–
–
0.98 × 106
16.4 × 10−3
16.7 ± 0.12
hGH
23.6
22.5
0.047
5.67
882.13
1
9.70 × 105
2.83 × 10−5
29.2 ± 2.0 × 10−3
PAS#1(600)-hGH
73.1
612
4.42
415.88
12.02
94
4.60 × 105
3.58 × 10−5
77.8 ± 2.1 × 10−3
Biophysical and in vivo murine PK data of
PASylated proteinsTo gain further information on the conformational properties of the PAS tag,
circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded for the IFN fusion proteins
(Fig. 2F). The CD spectrum
of the unfused IFN exhibited the typical features of an α-helical protein
with two characteristic minima around 208 and 220 nm. However, the spectra of
the corresponding PAS fusion proteins revealed an evident deviation: with
increasing length of the polymer a predominant negative minimum around 200 nm
arose. To visualize the spectroscopic contributions by the PAS fusion partner in
greater detail, we calculated the molar difference CD spectra with respect to
the unfused IFN (Fig. 2G). For
all PAS fusion proteins a strong minimum at 198 nm appeared, which is clearly
indicative of random coil conformation (Fändrich and Dobson, 2002). Furthermore, if considered on a
molar basis, the negative amplitude at 198 nm increased proportionally to the
length of the PAS tag, thus revealing that the PAS polypeptide as part of the
recombinant fusion protein represents a true random chain under physiological
buffer conditions. Very similar difference CD spectra were also observed for the
PASylated Fab and hGH (Supplementary Fig. S3), demonstrating that the PAS random coil
conformation is not influenced by the secondary structure of the biologically
active fusion partner, i.e. predominantly α-helix for IFN and hGH versus
β-sheet in the case of the Fab.The biophysical behavior of PAS#1 fusion proteins was further investigated
with regard to isoelectric and hydrophilic properties. Isoelectric focusing
(IEF) experiments, carried out for PAS600-IFN (Fig. 2C) and PAS600-hGH (not shown), revealed a negligible
influence on the isoelectric point (pI) of the biologically
active protein, in line with the complete absence of charged side chains in the
PAS sequence. On the other hand, hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC)
showed a very similar, even slightly earlier elution upon decreasing solvent
polarity for PAS#1(600)-hGH compared with the original protein,
illustrating the low hydrophobicity of the PAS polypeptide despite the lack of
strongly polar side chains (Fig. 3). Finally, we tested the influence of the PAS tag on the folding
stability of the biologically active fusion partner hGH by thermal unfolding in
a CD spectrometer. Both the unmodified recombinant hGH and its PASylated version
showed a single unfolding transition with unchanged cooperativity
(Fig. 3C). While hGH
itself had a melting temperature (Tm) of 85.4
°C, its PAS#1(600) fusion was even slightly more stable
(Tm = 88.6 °C), demonstrating that
the natively unstructured PAS tag does not negatively influence the stability of
the folded protein moiety. Notably, whereas hGH showed aggregation upon thermal
unfolding the cuvette stayed clear for the PASylated protein, indicating a
solubilizing effect of the PAS polypeptide. Similar observations were made
during thermal unfolding of the PASylated IFN (not shown).
Fig. 3.
Biophysical characterization of PAS#1(600)-hGH.
(A) Mass spectrometric analysis of
PAS#1(600)-hGH by ESI-MS, confirming the calculated molecular
mass of 73121.65 Da as well as precisely monodisperse composition,
without any indication of prematurely terminated gene products.
(B) Hydrophobicity analysis of PASylated hGH by
reverse-phase (RP) HPLC. HIC of the original recombinant hGH and its
PASylated version was performed on a Resource RPC column using an
elution gradient from 2% v/v acetonitrile, 0.065% v/v
TFA to 80% v/v acetonitrile, 0.05% v/v TFA. Both
profiles show a single homogeneous peak with slightly earlier
elution of PAS#1(600)-hGH (51.8% acetonitrile) in
comparison with the corresponding unfused protein (52.3%
acetonitrile). (C) Thermal denaturation of hGH and
PAS#1(600)-hGH as determined by far UV CD measurement.
Thermal unfolding of a 8.2 µM protein solution in 50 mM
K2SO4, 20 mM K-Pi pH 7.5 was
followed at a wavelength of 208 nm where maximal spectral change
upon unfolding was observed and the normalized unfolded fraction,
f(u), was plotted as a function of temperature. The melting
temperatures (Tm) of hGH and
PAS#1(600)-hGH were 85.4°C and 88.6°C,
respectively.
Biophysical characterization of PAS#1(600)-hGH.
(A) Mass spectrometric analysis of
PAS#1(600)-hGH by ESI-MS, confirming the calculated molecular
mass of 73121.65 Da as well as precisely monodisperse composition,
without any indication of prematurely terminated gene products.
(B) Hydrophobicity analysis of PASylated hGH by
reverse-phase (RP) HPLC. HIC of the original recombinant hGH and its
PASylated version was performed on a Resource RPC column using an
elution gradient from 2% v/v acetonitrile, 0.065% v/v
TFA to 80% v/v acetonitrile, 0.05% v/v TFA. Both
profiles show a single homogeneous peak with slightly earlier
elution of PAS#1(600)-hGH (51.8% acetonitrile) in
comparison with the corresponding unfused protein (52.3%
acetonitrile). (C) Thermal denaturation of hGH and
PAS#1(600)-hGH as determined by far UV CD measurement.
Thermal unfolding of a 8.2 µM protein solution in 50 mM
K2SO4, 20 mM K-Pi pH 7.5 was
followed at a wavelength of 208 nm where maximal spectral change
upon unfolding was observed and the normalized unfolded fraction,
f(u), was plotted as a function of temperature. The melting
temperatures (Tm) of hGH and
PAS#1(600)-hGH were 85.4°C and 88.6°C,
respectively.To investigate the influence of the detailed composition of the PAS sequences
(Fig. 1C) on their
biophysical properties we fused the polymerPAS#5 (with 192 residues from
8 ligated 24mer cassettes) to the N-terminus of IFN and
characterized the purified fusion protein by analytical SEC and CD spectroscopy
(not shown). Again, the PAS#5 polypeptide revealed the characteristic CD
minimum for a random coil, and in SEC the hydrodynamic volume of the fusion
protein was increased by a factor 4.4, similar to the PAS#1(200) fusion
protein. To further study the role of the Pro residues on the properties of PAS
polypeptides we designed the sequence PAS#1P2 in which the number of Pro
residues was reduced from 7 to 2 per 20-residue stretch (cf. Fig. 1C). The resulting 200 residue polymer
(from 10 ligated 20mer cassettes) was fused both to IFN and to the 4D5 Fab
fragment. Although both fusion proteins could be produced in the periplasm of
E.coli in a soluble form they showed clearly reduced yields
(ca. 30% in comparison with the corresponding PAS#1 versions).
Furthermore, they exhibited a much faster electrophoretic mobility in
SDS–PAGE (as shown in Supplementary Fig. S4 for the Fab fragment), indicating a more
compact, less random-like conformation and/or better binding of SDS. Indeed,
analytical SEC revealed a significantly smaller apparent molecular size, e.g. of
82.2 kDa for PAS#1P2(200)-IFN (cf. above). Thus, lowering the proportion
of Pro results in a collapse of the conformationally expanded PAS random coil
and, consequently, the Pro content appears as an important parameter for their
beneficial biophysical characteristics.
PAS fusion leads to strongly prolonged PK in mice while retaining high
target-binding activity
Based on the enlarged hydrodynamic volume we anticipated that conjugation of
proteins with PAS polypeptides should lead to reduced clearance via kidney
filtration in vivo, similar to coupling with PEG. Therefore,
the PK of PASylated IFN and 4D5 Fab fragment was investigated in BALB/c mice and
compared with the corresponding unfused proteins. After i.v. injection blood
samples were taken at fixed time points and recombinant protein concentrations
in plasma were determined using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA; Fig. 4,
Table I), followed by
numerical analysis with WinNonlin software.
Fig. 4.
Effect of PASylation on protein PK. (A) PK of
recombinant IFN and its PASylated versions in the blood of female
BALB/c mice up to 48 h post i.v. injection at a dose of 5 mg/kg body
weight (b.w.). The protein concentration in plasma was quantified in
a sandwich ELISA using appropriate calibration curves and plotted
against the time of sampling. Data were fitted with WinNonlin ver.
6.1 assuming a bi-exponential decay. Resulting parameters are listed
in Table I.
(B) PK of the 4D5 Fab fragment and its PASylated
forms—as well as a PEGylated version and an ABD fusion (see
text)—measured as in (A). Plasma concentration values were
plotted in a semi-logarithmic fashion. (C) Plot of the
AUC values (normalized to the unmodified protein, left) determined
from the PK analysis in (B) and of the apparent
MW from the SEC analysis in
Fig. 2D
(right) against the length of the PAS sequence for the PASylated Fab
fragments. For comparison, the dotted line indicates the true
protein mass.
Effect of PASylation on protein PK. (A) PK of
recombinant IFN and its PASylated versions in the blood of female
BALB/c mice up to 48 h post i.v. injection at a dose of 5 mg/kg body
weight (b.w.). The protein concentration in plasma was quantified in
a sandwich ELISA using appropriate calibration curves and plotted
against the time of sampling. Data were fitted with WinNonlin ver.
6.1 assuming a bi-exponential decay. Resulting parameters are listed
in Table I.
(B) PK of the 4D5 Fab fragment and its PASylated
forms—as well as a PEGylated version and an ABD fusion (see
text)—measured as in (A). Plasma concentration values were
plotted in a semi-logarithmic fashion. (C) Plot of the
AUC values (normalized to the unmodified protein, left) determined
from the PK analysis in (B) and of the apparent
MW from the SEC analysis in
Fig. 2D
(right) against the length of the PAS sequence for the PASylated Fab
fragments. For comparison, the dotted line indicates the true
protein mass.The PAS#1-IFN fusion proteins showed bi-exponential decay, irrespective of
the presence of the PAS tag, whereupon the unfused IFN exhibited the fastest
excretion of all. In contrast, the values for the terminal elimination half-life
of the PASylated IFN were dramatically increased depending on the length of the
attached polymer, from 32 min for the unfused protein to 15.85 h for the
PAS#1(600) fusion (Table I), thus demonstrating a strong prolongation effect of the PAS tag
on in vivo PK. This was reflected by the values obtained for
the clearance (decrease from 396.3 to 4.3 ml h−1
kg−1) and an almost 100-fold increase in the area under
the curve (AUC), from 12.6 to 1171 h μg ml−1. Thus, by
varying the length of the PAS polypeptide the in vivo half-life
can be simply adjusted to the desired experimental application.The 4D5 Fab fragment fused with the PAS#1 polypeptide at the
C-terminus of its light chain showed a similar
bi-exponential PK profile (Fig. 4B). Again, the values strongly increased with growing length of the PAS
sequence, culminating in a factor 21 for the PAS#1(600) fusion compared
with the original Fab. Surprisingly, the duoPAS Fab, with a molecular mass
almost identical to the linear Fab-PAS400 fusion, showed a terminal half-life
that was even longer than the one of Fab-PAS600, with a 66% higher AUC,
even though its apparent molecular size as measured by SEC was nearly 250 kDa
smaller. Notably, this branched PAS fusion protein also showed a longer PK than
the PEG(20)2 conjugate. Hence, similar to branched PEG (Jevsevar ), not only the hydrodynamic volume—which is mainly
determined by the length of the polymer chain—seems to be an important
parameter for kidney filtration but also the average density of the random coil.
Apart from that it is noteworthy that the branched PASylated Fab fragment also
showed a longer plasma half-life than the corresponding fusion protein with the
streptococcal albumin-binding domain, which effects
retarded clearance by mediating association with serum albumin (Schlapschy ).Interestingly, when plotting the apparent molecular size measured by analytical
SEC against the sequence length of the PAS#1 polypeptide, a linear
relationship was observed (Fig. 4C). This was unexpected because classical polymer theory predicts a
square root dependence of the average dimensions of a true random chain upon
sequence length Cantor and Schimmel,
1980). When plotting the measured plasma AUC of the PASylated Fab
fragments against the PAS length even an ascending slope became apparent,
indicating that clearance gets increasingly sensitive to an extension of chain
length—not unlike the effect of PEG conjugation described before (Mehvar, 2000). Thus, one can
anticipate that still longer circulation in blood than described here may be
realized via PASylation. In fact, PAS fusion proteins with up to 1000 residues
were successfully prepared up to now.To analyse the effect of the attached PAS polypeptide on the biochemical activity
of the functional protein component we measured thermodynamic affinities and
binding kinetics using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy (SPR, BIAcore),
both for the 4D5 Fab fragment toward its antigen, i.e. the recombinant
ErbB2/Her2 ectodomain, and for IFN toward its receptor, a humanIFN-α/β R2-Fc chimera (Table I; Supplementary Fig. S5). All real-time SPR traces showed typical
association and dissociation phases and could be fitted to the ideal Langmuir
model for bimolecular complex formation. In both cases the PASylated proteins
behaved very similar to the unfused molecules, and with growing length of the
PAS tag there was only a marginal increase in the dissociation constant
(KD), up to a factor 2.1 for the
Fab-PAS#1(600) fusion. This was mostly due to a slower rate constant of
association (kon), in line with a hampered diffusion
through the surface matrix of the sensorchip.In comparison, for the PEGylated Fab fragment kon was reduced to a
similar extent as for the PAS#1(400) fusion. Furthermore, binding of the
PASylated Fab to its native cell-bound target receptor was studied using
fluorescence-activated cell sorting of the SK-BR-3tumor cell line (Supplementary Fig. S6). In this instance a more pronounced loss
in apparent affinity was observed for the PASylated Fab fragment (from 2 nM for
the unmodified Fab to 15.9 nM for Fab-PAS600), possibly indicating reduced
sterical accessibility of the bulky molecule to the Her2 receptor when exposed
directly on the cellular plasma membrane, embedded among the glycocalyx.In the SPR analysis of IFN, PASylation led to an increase in
KD from 2.4 nM to about 9 nM, that is by less
than a factor 4. Interestingly, this decrease was essentially independent of the
polymer length, indicating an effect primarily resulting from structural
modification of the N-terminus of the cytokine rather than from
the increase in hydrodynamic volume. This time, PEGylation caused a clearly
larger decline in affinity by a factor 7 (see Table I).
In vivo activity of PASylated hGH as an established
biopharmaceutical
To investigate the bioactivity of a PASylated protein, hGH (somatropin) was
chosen as an established model biopharmaceutical (Franklin and Geffner, 2009). Recombinant hGH as well
as its fusion with a PAS#1(600) polypeptide were produced in
E.coli and purified to homogeneity (Fig. 3A), including endotoxin depletion.
According to SEC analysis the PASylated hGH showed an expanded hydrodynamic
volume, larger by a factor 26 compared with the unfused protein (not shown),
while CD spectroscopy indicated random coil conformation for the PAS tag with a
spectral signature very similar to the PASylated IFN described above (Supplementary Fig. S3). Affinity measurements using SPR with an
immobilized hGH receptor Fc chimera (Fig. 5) uncovered high binding activity with a
KD value of 77.8 ± 2.1 pM for PAS-hGH.
This number was very close to that for the original recombinant protein
(KD = 29.2 ± 2.0 pM), once again
demonstrating that PASylation has only a marginal effect on receptor affinity.
As observed in the other instances before, the slightly higher
KD value was mainly due to a decrease in the
rate constant of association (kon) whereas
koff was nearly unaffected by the PAS tag (cf.
Table I).
Fig. 5.
In vitro/in vivo activity and
plasma half-life of PASylated hGH. (A) Real-time
kinetic analysis of PAS#1(600)-hGH binding to the hGH
receptor as Fc chimera immobilized on a Xantec CMPD sensorchip
(ΔRU ≈ 200) measured on a BIAcore 2000 instrument. The
signals for various hGH concentrations are depicted as red lines
while curve fits according to a 1 : 1 Langmuir model are shown in
black. The resulting kinetic and affinity parameters are listed in
Table I.
(B) PK of hGH and its PAS#1(600) fusion in
the blood of C57BL6/J mice up to 24 h post i.v. versus s.c.
injection. In the case of i.v. application, WinNonlin data analysis
revealed a terminal half-life of 4.42 h for PAS#1(600)-hGH,
contrasting with 0.047 h for hGH. The PK profiles for s.c.
administration show distinct resorption and elimination phases with
a terminal half-life of 3.72 h for PAS#1(600)-hGH.
(C) PD study in growth-retarded homozygous
(lit/lit) mice of strain C57BL/6J (age: ca. 8 weeks, weight:
10–12 g). Four groups (N = 7 or 8)
were injected s.c. starting on Day 0 with either PBS vehicle or a
fixed dose of 43 nmol/kg (b.w.) of hGH or of PAS#1(600)-hGH
each day or of PAS#1(600)-hGH every second day (see arrows).
Body weights were measured and normalized according to the mean b.w.
for each mouse during eight days before the first injection (i.e.
set to 100%). These normalized values (depicted with error
bars representing the standard deviation) were averaged for each
group on a daily basis and linearly fitted. The slope of the
straight line represents the daily increase in b.w.: PBS: 0.86
± 0.14%/day; hGH: 1.48 ± 0.08%/day;
PAS#1(600)-hGH: 3.01 ± 0.09%/day;
PAS#1(600)-hGH injected every 2nd day: 2.84 ±
0.12%/day. (D) Comparison of IGF-1 biomarker
concentration in the plasma of mice from (C) at the end of the
experiment as measured in a sandwich ELISA.
In vitro/in vivo activity and
plasma half-life of PASylated hGH. (A) Real-time
kinetic analysis of PAS#1(600)-hGH binding to the hGH
receptor as Fc chimera immobilized on a Xantec CMPD sensorchip
(ΔRU ≈ 200) measured on a BIAcore 2000 instrument. The
signals for various hGH concentrations are depicted as red lines
while curve fits according to a 1 : 1 Langmuir model are shown in
black. The resulting kinetic and affinity parameters are listed in
Table I.
(B) PK of hGH and its PAS#1(600) fusion in
the blood of C57BL6/J mice up to 24 h post i.v. versus s.c.
injection. In the case of i.v. application, WinNonlin data analysis
revealed a terminal half-life of 4.42 h for PAS#1(600)-hGH,
contrasting with 0.047 h for hGH. The PK profiles for s.c.
administration show distinct resorption and elimination phases with
a terminal half-life of 3.72 h for PAS#1(600)-hGH.
(C) PD study in growth-retarded homozygous
(lit/lit) mice of strain C57BL/6J (age: ca. 8 weeks, weight:
10–12 g). Four groups (N = 7 or 8)
were injected s.c. starting on Day 0 with either PBS vehicle or a
fixed dose of 43 nmol/kg (b.w.) of hGH or of PAS#1(600)-hGH
each day or of PAS#1(600)-hGH every second day (see arrows).
Body weights were measured and normalized according to the mean b.w.
for each mouse during eight days before the first injection (i.e.
set to 100%). These normalized values (depicted with error
bars representing the standard deviation) were averaged for each
group on a daily basis and linearly fitted. The slope of the
straight line represents the daily increase in b.w.: PBS: 0.86
± 0.14%/day; hGH: 1.48 ± 0.08%/day;
PAS#1(600)-hGH: 3.01 ± 0.09%/day;
PAS#1(600)-hGH injected every 2nd day: 2.84 ±
0.12%/day. (D) Comparison of IGF-1 biomarker
concentration in the plasma of mice from (C) at the end of the
experiment as measured in a sandwich ELISA.Biochemical stability of PAS-hGH was studied in vitro by
incubation with mouse plasma (Supplementary Fig. S7), demonstrating resistance against
proteolysis for at least 2 days at 37°C. On the other hand, we
investigated biodegradability of the PASylated hGH (Supplementary Fig. S8), as it is well known that PEGylated
proteins can accumulate in tissues, e.g. leading to renal vacuolation (Bendele ). When the fusion protein was incubated with varying dilutions of a
freshly prepared mouse kidney homogenate PAS-hGH was rapidly degraded.
Consequently, in contrast to the poorly degradable chemical polymerPEG, PAS
polypeptides should be easily metabolized.The PK profile of PAS-hGH in comparison with the unfused protein was investigated
both for i.v. and s.c. application, the latter to mimic clinical drug
administration. In case of the i.v. bolus injection the recombinant hGH was very
rapidly cleared from the blood stream (Fig. 5B) with a terminal half-life of less than 3 min,
reflecting the known receptor-mediated uptake on top of renal elimination (Webster ). However, a much delayed clearance was seen with the PASylated hGH,
showing a 94-fold longer terminal half-life of 4.42 h. Following s.c.
application, PASylated hGH exhibited the typical PK profile according to the
Bateman function (Garrett, 1994),
with strong increase in plasma concentration already shortly after
administration (2–4 h), indicating quick and high bioavailability. The
subsequent elimination half-life was 3.72 h, similar to that of the i.v.
application. Notably, AUC after s.c. injection was 50-fold larger for PAS-hGH
than for the unfused protein, thus promising much increased drug exposure.The in vivo bioactivity of PAS-hGH was investigated in a
C57BL/6J-Ghrhr/J mouse model exhibiting
growth retardation due to a defect in growth hormone release (Fig. 5C). The dwarfism of these
‘little’ mice can be reversed by s.c. administration of hGH (Bellini and Bartolini, 1993). To
assess the normal (background) growth rate, one group of the homozygous female
mice received a daily dose of buffer vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline; PBS),
which led to a body weight gain of 0.86% per day. A second and third
group received a daily dose of 43 nmol/kg (b.w.) of unfused hGH or of
PAS#1(600)-hGH, respectively, which resulted in an additional daily
weight increase of 0.62 and of 2.15%. Thus, PAS#1(600)-hGH had a
more than 3-fold stronger growth-promoting effect than the original hGH.
Furthermore, a fourth group received the same injection of PAS#1(600)-hGH
only every second day. Remarkably, this led to a net growth rate
(1.98%/day) nearly identical to that upon daily dosing, which confirms
the prolonged action of the PASylated protein drug.In all groups tested the growth effect remained essentially constant for at least
10 days and the animals showed normal behavior, food intake and drinking,
resulting in a body weight gain by >25% for PAS-hGH at the end of
the experiment, without any signs of drug toxicity. These findings demonstrate
that PASylation can boost bioactivity of hGH in an established animal model
resulting in an at least 6-fold higher PD effect—based on the average
molar dose—hence allowing lower dosing at longer intervals.The enhanced bioactivity of PAS-hGH was further confirmed by measuring the
insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 level, which is upregulated upon stimulation
via hGH in a concentration-dependent manner and serves as biomarker for drug
activity (Salvatori, 2004), at the
end of the experiment. In fact, PASylated hGH led to a 2.8-fold higher IGF-1
plasma concentration compared with the mice treated with hGH alone
(Fig. 5D). Furthermore,
organs taken from mice treated daily with PAS#1(600)-hGH showed no
histological changes in kidney, liver and spleen (Supplementary Fig. S9), which supports the good tolerability of
the PASylated protein. Finally, plasma taken from the mice treated daily with
PAS-hGH or with hGH was tested for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). IgG reactive
against the hGH moiety was detectable on a western blot (Supplementary Fig. S10), in accordance with the known
immunogenicity of hGH in mice (Lee
). However, there was no
cross-reactivity with several unrelated proteins fused with the same
PAS#1 sequence, indicating that the PAS polypeptide itself is not
immunogenic. This finding was also supported in a mouse immunization and epitope
analysis conducted with the PASylated IFN (Supplementary Figs S11–13).
Discussion
We propose a new technology, dubbed PASylation, that enables the preparation of
biologically and/or pharmaceutically functional proteins furnished with prolonged
in vivo activity. PASylation mimics the advantageous
biophysical properties of the chemical polymerPEG, especially the expanded
hydrodynamic volume that provokes slow down of kidney filtration. In contrast,
fusion with the biological PAS polypeptide(s) avoids obvious drawbacks of
PEGylation, namely the effort for chemical conjugation with the costly protein
component as well as isolation of functional product, the inherent polydispersity of
the polymer and the risk of organ accumulation due to cellular uptake without an
efficient route for metabolization.The biophysical evidence available, in particular from SEC and CD experiments,
clearly indicates a random chain behavior of PAS polypeptides that is responsible
for their PEG-like characteristics in solution and, consequently, for the retarded
renal clearance of their conjugates. Obviously, the dominating molecular
contribution of the polar peptide backbone groups, together with the hydroxyl groups
of Ser residues, in relation to the very small hydrocarbon side chains of the PAS
amino acids cause the strongly hydrophilic properties—despite the complete
lack of charges (as in PEG).In fact, the molar ratio between apolar hydrocarbon and polar hydrogen bond
donor/acceptor atomic groups, i.e. CHn:(NH/CO/OH), for the PAS#1
sequence is 54:43 = 1.25 whereas the corresponding value is significantly
larger for PEG, with a CH2:O ratio of 2. Hence, as long as exposed to the
solvent as part of the natively unfolded chain the polar peptide groups ensure a
strongly hydrophilic character of the PAS polymer. Furthermore, the abrupt change in
the random coil structure when lowering the proportion of Pro residues within a PAS
sequence underlines the role of this imino acid for the beneficial properties,
probably both due to its nature as secondary structure breaker and to its
N-terminal cis/trans
isomerism that increases the backbone entropy of the random chain. Apart from that,
the exact sequence of the Pro, Ala and Ser amino acids seems to play a minor role.
Indeed, no screening effort for the optimization of PAS sequences was necessary,
once the fundamental principle had been uncovered.All observations so far indicate a rather inert biochemical behavior of the PAS
polypeptides. Generally, there is no detectable association tendency in solution,
whereas a PAS tag seems to solubilize its fusion partner to a certain extent.
Conversely, there is no shielding effect as sometimes described for PEG (Jevsevar )
and also for other amino acid polymer sequences (Schellenberger ); instead,
PASylated proteins retain their target- or receptor-binding activities in an almost
quantitative manner. Except for the rather inert alcohol group of Ser, there are no
chemically reactive side chains present in the PAS polypeptides, which results in
strong resistance against post-translational modification, especially hydrolysis and
air oxidation. The high grade of definition of all PAS fusion proteins prepared up
to now is reflected by the monodisperse mass spectra and the plain IEF profiles and
should constitute a major advantage for bioprocess development.Furthermore, PAS sequences are well compatible with the cellular secretion
machinery—not only for E.coli but also for eukaryotic host
cells such as Pichia pastoris and CHO or HEK cell lines (to be
published)—which does not only facilitate the formation of disulfide bridges
that are present in the majority of therapeutic proteins but also directly leads to
a mature N-terminus (after intracellular processing by signal
peptidase). Also, the inert and natively unfolded constitution make PAS polypeptides
poor antigens for antibodies, beside their inherent lack of T-cell epitopes, which
was clearly demonstrated by the absence of immune reactivity toward the PAS moiety
both in animal immunization and repeated dose administration experiments.Fab fragments with their pair of C-termini remote from the combining
site have provided a nice model system in order to generate quasi-branched PAS tags,
similarly to the branched PEG reagents that are nowadays in use for chemical
conjugation (Jevsevar ). Interestingly, the branching led to a significantly stronger
PK-extending effect than for a linear PAS chain of the same length. This phenomenon
has been repeatedly observed in our laboratory for other proteins of interest. Of
course, PAS polypeptides can also be linked to both N- and
C-termini of the same protein component (provided there is no
prohibitory sterical interference with target association) and they can even serve
as linkers between two biochemically active proteins to generate bispecific reagents
with prolonged plasma half-life.Generally, due to the laws of allometric scaling (Mahmood, 2005) the plasma half-life of typically sized
proteins subject to biomedical research—including antibody fragments, growth
factors, cytokines, receptor fragments, enzymes or even bioactive peptides—in
small laboratory animals like mice or rats is extremely short, usually in the range
of minutes. This phenomenon is often underestimated when designing animal
experiments such that overly high doses are required in order to study in
vivo activity, which on the contrary can lead to undesired side
effects.PASylation provides a simple and inexpensive approach to researchers familiar with
recombinant protein preparation in order to equip their biomolecule of interest with
a satisfactory and even tunable circulation half-life. The resulting fusion protein
is highly homogeneous both with regard to molecular size and to the site of PAS
attachment, contrasting with most of the PEGylation techniques available to date.
Moreover, upon scaling up no costly reagents or additional bioprocessing steps are
needed; consequently, PASylation also offers prospects for biopharmaceutical drug
development, going beyond preclinical research.A few other structurally disordered and/or low complexity amino acid biopolymers have
been proposed before in order to tailor PK properties, in particular the Gly-rich
homo amino acid polymers (Schlapschy
) and the PESTAG sequences (dubbed XTEN,
Schellenberger ). While the former suffer from limited solubility and an
insufficient hydrodynamic volume effect the latter contain a large proportion of Glu
residues, leading to high overall anionic charge and a very low pI
value for the fusion protein—which can affect tissue distribution and cell
surface receptor affinity. Nevertheless, XTEN fusion proteins have already been
subject to phase I clinical trials (Schellenberger ; Cleland ), thus indicating
safety and tolerability of unstructured polypeptide fusion technologies.As we have demonstrated here, PASylation offers unique advantages, that is,
surprisingly similar biophysical behavior compared with PEGylation, strong and
tunable PK extending effects and conservation of high target-binding activity.
Finally, this technology allows efficient secretion in microbial as well as
eukaryotic host organisms due to the biochemically inert, uncharged, yet hydrophilic
nature of the PAS polypeptides.
Materials and methods
Gene synthesis for the PAS amino acid sequences
Recombinant DNA manipulation was performed using general procedures (Sambrook ). Gene fragments encoding building blocks of 20 or 24 amino
acids were obtained by hybridization of two complementary oligodeoxynucleotidesas shown in Fig. 1C and
ligated in a directed manner via their mutually compatible but non-palindromic
sticky ends according to a previously described strategy (Schlapschy ). The
synthetic gene fragments resulting from concatamer formation in the presence of
a limiting amount of DNA ligase—e.g. 300 or 600 bp for a
PAS#1(100) or PAS#1(200) cassette, respectively—were
isolated by excising the DNA band with desired length from the ladder of
ligation products after electrophoretic separation on a preparative agarose gel.
These DNA fragments were initially cloned on an intermediate plasmid based on
pASK75 (Skerra, 1994), which
carries two SapI restriction sites
(5′-GCTCTTCN′NNN) in reverse orientation, leading to the same pair
of sticky ends with 5′-GCC/5′-GGC overhangs. This vector
(pASK-2xSapI) was cut with SapI, dephosphorylated with shrimp
alkaline phosphatase (USB, Cleveland, OH, USA), and ligated with the synthetic
DNA fragment. After transformation of E.coli XL1-Blue (Bullock ), plasmids were prepared and the cloned inserts were characterized
by restriction analysis and automated double-stranded DNA sequencing (ABIPrism
310 Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany) using suitable
flanking primers. From the resulting vector, the PAS-encoding DNA cassette could
be excised again via SapI digest (this time cutting on both
sides of the insert) and used for subcloning as described below.
Construction of expression plasmids for the production of Fab fragments as
fusion with different PAS sequences
Starting with the previously described expression plasmid pASK88-4D5 (Schlapschy ), the Strep-tag II (Schmidt and Skerra, 2007) was fused to the
C-terminus of the light chain using PCR mutagenesis,
resulting in pASK88-4D5-HC-His/LC-StrepII (HC: heavy chain; LC: light chain).
Then, a SapI restriction site was introduced at the
3′-end of the human Cκ gene directly upstream of the
Strep-tag II, generating upon cleavage a sticky end that
corresponds to a GCC (Ala) codon as above. The various PAS cassettes cloned
before on pASK-2xSapI were excised via restriction digest with
SapI and ligated with the likewise cut plasmid
pASK88-4D5-HC-His/LC-StrepII. To generate longer PAS-encoding inserts, an excess
of the PAS DNA cassette was used for ligation, thus allowing multiple insertion
in a head to tail fashion. Alternatively, a plasmid carrying already one insert
was linearized again using the SapI site at its upstream end
and subjected to ligation with a new PAS DNA cassette. The plasmids were named
pASK88-4D5-HC-His/LC-PAS#X(aa)-StrepII with X denoting the PAS version
and aa indicating the length of the inserted amino acid polymer (cf. Fig. 1; SII: Strep-tag
II).For construction of
pASK88-4D5-HC-PAS#1(200)-His/LC-PAS#1(200)-StrepII, first a
SapI restriction site was introduced into pASK88-4D5 at the
3′-end of the humanCH1 gene directly upstream of the
His6-tag. Then, the cloned PAS#1(200) gene cassette was
inserted via this restriction site as before. Finally, the gene cassette for the
entire Ig light chain was substituted via the NcoI and
HindIII restriction sites with the one carrying a
C-terminal PAS#1(200) sequence from
pASK88-4D5-HC-His/LC-PAS#1(200)-StrepII.The cDNA for humanIFNα2b was amplified from the plasmid IRAMp995M1713Q
(Deutsches Ressourcenzentrum für Genomforschung, RZPD, Berlin, Germany)
using the primers
5′-TCTGTGGGCGCCAGCTCTTCTGCCTGTGATCTGCCTCAAACCCAC
and 5′-GAACCAAAGCTTATTCCTTACTTCTTAAAC. The first
primer contained a KasI restriction site at the 5′-end,
followed by a SapI recognition site (both underlined), whereas
the second primer contained a HindIII site (underlined). The
PCR product was purified and digested with KasI and
HindIII and ligated with the vector pASK-IBA4 (IBA,
Göttingen, Germany) which had been cut likewise. The cDNA for hGH was
amplified from the plasmid IRATp970A09116D (RZPD) using the primers
5′-CCGCTAGCCATCACCACCATCACCATGGCGCCAGCTCTTCTGCCTTCCCAACCATTCCCTTATCC
and 5′-GCCACC AAGCTTAGAAGCCACAGCTGCCC. The first
primer encoded an N-terminal His6-tag and contained
an NheI restriction site at the 5′-end, followed by
KasI and SapI recognition sites (all
underlined), whereas the second primer contained a HindIII site
(underlined). The PCR product was purified, digested with NheI
and HindIII, and ligated with the vector pASK75 (Skerra, 1994) which had been cut
likewise. After transformation of E.coli XL1-Blue, plasmids
were prepared and the sequences of the cloned inserts were confirmed by
restriction analysis and double-stranded DNA sequencing. The plasmids coding for
IFN and hGH as fusions with an N-terminal
Strep-tag II or His6-tag, respectively, were
designated pASK-IBA4-IFN and pASK75-His6-hGH.For the construction of corresponding expression plasmids encoding IFN or hGH as
fusion proteins with PAS#1 sequences of different lengths, pASK-IBA4-IFN
or pASK75-His6-hGH were cut with SapI,
dephosphorylated with shrimp alkaline phosphatase, and ligated with an excess of
the cloned PAS#1(200) gene cassette from above. After transformation of
E.coli JM83 (Yanisch-Perron ), plasmids were
prepared and the presence and size of the inserts were confirmed by restriction
analysis. The resulting plasmids were designated
pASK-IBA4-PAS#1(200/400/600)-IFN and
pASK75-PAS#1(200/400/600)-hGH, respectively.
Recombinant protein production and purification
All recombinant proteins were produced in E.coli KS272 (Meerman and Georgiou, 1994) harboring
the corresponding expression plasmid and, if useful, the helper plasmid pTUM4
(Schlapschy ). Bacteria were cultivated either in shake flasks containing 2 l
LB medium (Sambrook ) supplemented with 100 mg/l ampicillin, 30
mg/l chloramphenicol (for pTUM4), 1 g/l proline and 5 g/l glucose or,
alternatively, in a 4- or 8-l bench-top fermenter with a syntheticglucosemineral salt medium supplemented with 100 mg/l ampicillin, 30 mg/l
chloramphenicol and 1 g/l proline according to a published procedure (Schiweck and Skerra, 1995). In the
shake flask, recombinant gene expression was induced with 200 μg/l
anhydrotetracycline (aTc) (Skerra,
1994) at OD550 = 0.5 for up to 3 h at 22°C.
During fermenter production, induction was achieved by addition of 500
μg/l aTc as soon as the culture reached OD550 = 20 for
a period of up to 2.5 h. Immediately thereafter, the cells were harvested by
centrifugation and a periplasmic extract was prepared in the presence of 500 mM
sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0 supplemented with lysozyme as
appropriate.The Fab fragments and hGH were purified from the periplasmic extract via the
His6-tag using a Ni2+ charged HisTrap HP IMAC
column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) (Schiweck and Skerra, 1995). To further purify the PASylated Fab
fragments or to isolate IFN from the periplasmic extract,
Strep-Tactin affinity chromatography (Schmidt and Skerra, 2007) was employed. All proteins
were finally polished by SEC on Superdex 75 or 200 pg HiLoad 16/60 columns (GE
Healthcare) in PBS (4 mM KH2PO4, 16 mM
Na2HPO4, 115 mM NaCl).Purified proteins were concentrated by ultrafiltration using Amicon Ultra
centrifugal filter units (10 000 or 30 000 MWCO; 4 ml or 15 ml; Millipore,
Billerica, MA, USA) to about 1.0 mg/ml. For endotoxin removal proteins were
applied to anion exchange chromatography (Q Sepharose Fast Flow, GE Healthcare),
followed by an EndoTrap Red depletion step (Hyglos, Regensburg, Germany).
Typical endotoxin contents were below 10 EU/mg of protein as measured with an
Endosafe-PTS system using cartridges with 0.1–10 EU/ml sensitivity
(Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA, USA).SDS–PAGE was performed using a high molarity Tris buffer system (Fling and Gregerson, 1986) followed
by Coomassie brilliant blue staining. Protein concentrations were determined
according to the absorption at 280 nm using calculated extinction coefficients
(Gill and von Hippel, 1989) of
68 290 M−1 cm−1 for the original 4D5 Fab
fragment, 72 130 M−1 cm−1 for its ABD
fusion, 73 980 M−1 cm−1 for its fusion with
the different PAS sequences (which themselves show no ultraviolet absorption at
this wavelength), 16 050 M−1 cm−1 for hGH
and its fusions and 23 590 M−1 cm−1 for IFN
and its fusions. Reported yields of purified protein [mg L−1
OD−1] were normalized to 1 l of bacterial culture and
OD550 at harvest of 1.0.Analytical SEC was performed on a Superdex 200 HR 10/300 GL column (GE
Healthcare) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min using an Äkta Purifier 10 system
(GE Healthcare) with PBSas running buffer. The purified proteins (250
μl) were applied at a concentration of 0.25 mg/ml. ESI-MS was recorded
using an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) 6210 time-of-flight LC/MS
instrument.
CD spectroscopy
Secondary structure was analysed using a J-810 spectropolarimeter (Jasco,
Groß-Umstadt, Germany) equipped with a quartz cuvette 106-QS (0.1 mm path
length; Hellma, Muehllheim, Germany). Spectra were recorded at room temperature
from 190 to 250 nm by accumulating 32 runs (bandwidth 1 nm, scan speed 100
nm/min, response 4 s) using 3–20 μM protein solutions in 50 mM
K2SO4, 20 mM K-Pi pH 7.5. After correction
for buffer blanks, spectra were smoothed using the instrument software and the
molar ellipticity ΘM was calculated according to the equation
ΘM = Θobs/(cd),
wherein Θobs denotes the measured ellipticity, c the protein
concentration [mol/l], and d the path length of the quartz
cuvette [cm]. The normalized data were plotted—if applicable, after
mutual subtraction—against the wavelength using KaleidaGraph software
(Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA).For thermal unfolding, solutions of hGH and PAS#1(600)-hGH at a protein
concentration of 8.2 µM in 50 mM K2SO4, 20 mM
K-Pi pH 7.5 were applied in a thermostated 1 mm path length
cuvette sealed with a teflon lid. The sample was heated at a constant
temperature gradient of 60 K/h from 20°C to 100°C. Data were
collected each 0.2 K step at a wavelength of 208 nm where maximal spectral
change upon unfolding was observed. Data were fitted by non-linear least-squares
regression using KaleidaGraph and an equation for a two-state model of the
unfolding transition as previously described (Schlehuber and Skerra, 2002). Using the parameters
from the corresponding curve fit, the normalized unfolded fraction, f(u), was
plotted as a function of temperature.
PK animal experiments
For PK studies, female BALB/c mice (18–20 g) from Charles River
Laboratories were injected i.v. with the unfused 4D5 Fab fragment, its
PAS#1(100/200/400/600) or ABD fusions or the PEG(20)2
conjugate, and with the unfused IFN or its PAS#1(200/400/600) fusions. In
the case of hGH and its PAS#1(600) fusion female C57BL/6 mice
(18–20 g) (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were used for i.v.
and s.c. injection, in line with the genetic background of the
‘little’ mice used in the PD study described further below.All mice per group (N = 3) simultaneously received a dose
of 5 mg protein/kg (b.w.) in PBS, typically 100 µl of a 1 mg/ml protein
solution for a mouse with 20 g b.w. Blood samples were taken after 15 min, 30
min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h and 48 h from the tail vein
(group I: 15 min, 2 h, 6 h and 24 h; group II: 30 min, 3 h, 8 h and 36 h; group
III: 1, 4, 12 and 48 h). The plasma was prepared by centrifugation at 4°C
and 14 000 rpm for 20 min and stored at −20°C.To determine the plasma half-life of the 4D5 Fab fragment, IFN or hGH as well as
their PASylated versions, the concentration values, determined from ELISA
measurements (see below), were plotted against time post injection and
numerically fitted using WinNonlin version 6.1 software (Pharsight, St Louis,
MO, USA). Bi-exponential decay or a two-compartment system (in line with the
Bateman function) were assumed in the case of i.v. bolus or s.c. injections,
respectively. Data (including standard deviations) and curve fits were finally
plotted with KaleidaGraph.
PD study of in vivo activity for PASylated hGH
In vivo bioactivity of PASylated hGH in comparison with hGH was
studied in growth retarded dwarf miceas an established animal model (Bellini and Bartolini, 1993). To this
end, female ‘little’ mice (C57BL/6J lit/lit; Jackson Laboratory)
at an age of around 8 weeks and with an average body weight of 10–12 g
were used. All animals were kept in clear plastic cages in an air-conditioned
animal house. The temperature was maintained at 22°C and lighting was
regulated on a 12 h light, 12 h dark schedule. Mice were divided into four
groups with N = 7–8 animals. Groups I and II
received for up to 9 days a daily s.c. dose of 43 nmol/kg (b.w.) in 50 µl
PBS of hGH (=1.0 mg/kg (b.w.)) or PAS#1(600)-hGH (=3.12
mg/kg (b.w.)), respectively. Group III received an s.c. vehicle injection of 50
µl PBS whereas group IV was injected with PAS#1(600)-hGH with the
same dosage as group II but only every second day.Animal body weight was measured daily on a balance for 8 days (Day −7 to
Day 0) prior to the first sample injection (on Day 0) and then throughout the
entire period of the assay (Days 1–9). For each group the mean value of
the body weight was determined on each day. Then, the accumulated mean value for
the first 8 days (no injections, including Day 0) was calculated and used as
starting point in order to calculate the relative increase in average body
weight for each day during the treatment period. These values were plotted
against time and linearly fitted to deduce the growth rate using
KaleidaGraph.
ELISA for quantification of recombinant proteins in animal plasma
In the case of the 4D5 Fab fragment and its PASylated versions, 96-well
microtiter plates (12 × 8 well ELISA strips with high binding capacity;
NUNC, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated for 1 h with 50 μl of the
recombinant Her2/ErbB2 ectodomain (kindly provided by Tim Adams, CSIRO,
Parkville, Australia) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml in 50 mM
NaHCO3 pH 9.6 at room temperature. For quantification of humanIFN and its PASylated versions microtiter plates were coated with 100 μl
of a 5 μg/ml solution of the mouse anti-humanIFNα2b antibody 9D3
(Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in the same buffer. For quantification of hGH and its
PASylated versions the microtiter plates were coated with 50 µl of a 0.8
µg/ml solution of the mouse anti-hGH antibody GhG2 (Abcam).After that the wells were blocked with 200 µl 3% (w/v) bovine serum
albumin in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS/T) for 1 h and washed three
times with PBS/T. The plasma samples were applied in dilution series in PBS/T
supplemented with up to 0.5% (v/v) mouse plasma from an untreated animal
(to maintain constant content of sample matrix) and incubated for 1 h. The wells
were then washed three times with PBS/T and incubated for 1 h either with 50
μl of a 1 : 1000 dilution in PBS/T of anti-human Cκ-light chain
IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), to detect the Fab,
or with 50 μl of a 1 : 1000 diluted solution of an unrelated mouse
anti-humanIFNα2b antibody horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugate
(4E10-HRP; Abcam) or with 50 µl of a 1 : 1000 dilution of an unrelated
mouse anti-hGH antibody HRP-conjugate (GhB9-HRP; Abcam).After washing twice with PBS/T and twice with PBS the enzymatic activity was
detected using p-nitrophenyl phosphate or
2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) diammonium salt
(ABTS) as chromogenic substrates for the phosphatase and peroxidase reporter
enzymes, respectively. After 15 min at 25°C the absorbance at 405 nm was
measured using a SpectraMax 250 microtiter plate reader (Molecular Devices,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and concentrations of the recombinant proteins in the plasma
samples were quantified by comparison with standard curves that had been
determined for dilution series of the corresponding purified recombinant
proteins at defined concentrations in PBS/T containing 0.5% (v/v) mouse
plasma from untreated animals.
IGF-1 ELISA
To test the effect of hGH on an established biomarker (Yakar ) at the end of
the mousePD study, IGF-1 titers in the ‘little’ mice were
measured using a commercial Quantakine sandwich ELISA kit (R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN, USA). Plasma samples taken on Day 9 from 7 or 8 mice treated
daily with hGH or PAS#1(600)-hGH, respectively, were first diluted 1 : 50
with calibrator diluent. A concentration series with three further dilutions (1
: 100, 1 : 200, 1 : 400) was then prepared and the IGF-1 concentrations were
determined by ELISA using a standard curve with mouseIGF-1 of known
concentration (provided with the kit). Mean concentrations and standard
deviations from these measurements were first calculated for each mouse and then
for the two groups. A heteroskedastic T-test using Excel software (Microsoft,
Redmond, WA, USA) revealed a P value of 0.0016 (cf. Fig. 5D).
BIAcore real-time affinity measurements
Surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy was performed on a BIAcore 2000 or BIAcore
X Instrument (BIAcore, Uppsala, Sweden). To measure antigen affinity of the 4D5
Fab fragment and its PASylated versions the recombinant Her2/ErbB2 ectodomain
(100 µg/ml in 10 mM Na-acetate pH 4.5) was immobilized on a CMD200L
sensorchip (Xantec, Düsseldorf, Germany) using an amine coupling kit (GE
Healthcare), resulting in a surface density of around 540 resonance units
(ΔRU). In the case of IFN and hGH a CMPD chip (Xantec) was used and the
corresponding receptor ectodomains were applied as Fc fusion proteins
(R&D Systems) and immobilized via an amine-coupled anti-Fc antibody
(Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, UK), typically leading to ΔRU of
200–250. The Fab fragment, IFN and hGH were injected in appropriate
concentration series using PBS containing 0.005% (v/v) Tween 20as
running buffer. Complex formation was observed at a continuous flow rate of 25
µl/min and the kinetic parameters were determined by fitting data to a
Langmuir binding model for bimolecular complex formation using BIAevaluation
software version 4.1 (BIAcore). The sensorgrams were corrected by double
subtraction of the corresponding signals measured for the in-line control blank
channel and an averaged baseline determined from several buffer blank injections
(Myszka, 1999). Chip
regeneration was achieved with 10 mM glycine/HCl pH 2.2, 500 mM NaCl in the case
of the Fab fragment and with 10 mM glycine/HCl pH 2.7 in the case of IFN and
hGH.
PEGylation of the 4D5 Fab fragment
To prepare a site-specifically PEGylated 4D5 Fab fragment a version without
interchain disulfide bridge was used. Therefore, the Cys residue at the
C-terminus of the CH1 domain was deleted such
that the free singular Cys residue at the C-terminus of
Cκ was available for coupling with a maleimide conjugate
of branched PEG(20)2. The Fab fragment was produced in
E.coli via periplasmic secretion in the 2-l shake flask as
described above and its free thiol group was first activated by mild reduction
with 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol for 30 min at 30°C. After buffer exchange
via gel filtration on a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare), equilibrated
with nitrogen-saturated 100 mM Tris-acetate pH 5 containing 5 mM EDTA, 41.7 nmol
of the Fab fragment in a volume of 1.9 ml was mixed with the 3-fold molar amount
of PEG(20)2 (Sunbright GL2-MA400; NOF, Tokyo, Japan) dissolved in 100
µl water. The coupling reaction, with a total volume of 2 ml, was started
by addition of approximately 70 µl 1 M Tris base to adjust the pH to 7.5.
After 1 h incubation at room temperature uncoupled Fab was removed by SEC on a
Superdex S200 pg HighLoad 16/60 column. Excess PEG(20)2 was finally
removed by IMAC on a Zn2+ charged IDA sepharose column
(Chelating Sepharose Fast Flow; GE Healthcare). Eluate fractions were analysed
by SDS–PAGE, pooled, and dialysed against PBS. After concentration by
ultrafiltration using Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter devices (30 000 MWCO; 4
ml; Millipore) to about 1.5 mg/ml, endotoxin was removed by an EndoTrap Red
depletion step (Hyglos), and the 1 mg/ml protein solution was stored at
−20°C.
Isoelectric focusing
IEF was performed with the multi electrophoresis chamber IEF-system (SCIE-PLAS,
Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions using precast
IsoGel agarose IEF gels (Lonza, Allendale, NJ, USA) with a pH range of
3–10. 2 µg of each protein sample was applied in 4 M urea solution
in a total volume of 2 µl. The pH range 3.6–9.3 IEF mix
(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was applied as standard. Gels were run for
20 min at 1 W, followed by 100 min at 500 V and by 100 min at 1000 V. Then, the
gel was dried overnight on blotting paper (Lonza) at ambient temperature, washed
in water for 5 min and again dried at 55°C. After incubation in fixing
solution (36% v/v methanol, 6% w/v trichloroacetic acid,
3.6% w/v sulfosalicylic acid) for 4 h the gel was stained with 1%
w/v Coomassie brilliant blue (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) in 25% v/v
ethanol, 9% v/v acetic acid. After destaining in 25% v/v ethanol,
9% v/v acetic acid the gel was dried and scanned. Theoretical
pI values were calculated with the UWGCG software package
(Devereux ).
Reverse-Phase HPLC
The purified protein solution in PBS was adjusted to 2% v/v acetonitrile,
0.065% v/v trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and 1 ml was applied to a Resource
RPC 1 ml column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with buffer A (2% v/v
acetonitrile, 0.065% v/v TFA). For elution, a 0–100%
gradient of buffer B (80% v/v acetonitrile, 0.05% v/v TFA) was
applied over 20-bed volumes at a flow rate of 2 ml/min while monitoring protein
elution at both 280 and 225 nm (PAS only absorbs in the peptide backbone region
due to the absence of aromatic side chains).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Leading Edge Cluster
m (grant no. 01EX1022B and
01EX1022C) funded by the Bundesministerium für
Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany. Funding to pay the Open
Access publication charges for this article was provided by XL-protein GmbH.
Authors: Diane E Milenic; Karen J Wong; Kwamena E Baidoo; Tapan K Nayak; Celeste A S Regino; Kayhan Garmestani; Martin W Brechbiel Journal: MAbs Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Volker Schellenberger; Chia-Wei Wang; Nathan C Geething; Benjamin J Spink; Andrew Campbell; Wayne To; Michael D Scholle; Yong Yin; Yi Yao; Oren Bogin; Jeffrey L Cleland; Joshua Silverman; Willem P C Stemmer Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Ernest C Borden; Ganes C Sen; Gilles Uze; Robert H Silverman; Richard M Ransohoff; Graham R Foster; George R Stark Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Alyssa B Chinen; Chenxia M Guan; Jennifer R Ferrer; Stacey N Barnaby; Timothy J Merkel; Chad A Mirkin Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Rahul Rattan; Somnath Bhattacharjee; Hong Zong; Corban Swain; Muneeb A Siddiqui; Scott H Visovatti; Yogendra Kanthi; Sajani Desai; David J Pinsky; Sascha N Goonewardena Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Markus J Harder; Nadine Kuhn; Hubert Schrezenmeier; Britta Höchsmann; Inge von Zabern; Christof Weinstock; Thomas Simmet; Daniel Ricklin; John D Lambris; Arne Skerra; Markus Anliker; Christoph Q Schmidt Journal: Blood Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: David Wensel; Yongnian Sun; Zhufang Li; Sharon Zhang; Caryn Picarillo; Thomas McDonagh; David Fabrizio; Mark Cockett; Mark Krystal; Jonathan Davis Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 5.191