Literature DB >> 2375331

Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries.

C A Combs1, P A Robertson, R K Laros.   

Abstract

Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations occur frequently during operative vaginal deliveries. To identify risk factors for lacerations, 2832 consecutive forceps and vacuum extraction deliveries were analyzed. Third- and fourth-degree lacerations occurred in 30% of deliveries. Multiple logistic regression was used to control for intercorrelation between potential risk factors. Factors associated with increased risk for third- and fourth-degree lacerations were midline episiotomy, nulliparity, second-stage arrest, occipitoposterior position, low or mid station, use of forceps instead of vacuum, use of local anesthesia, and Asian race. When these factors were controlled, there was no effect of birth weight, faculty versus resident operator, gestational age, abnormalities of first-stage labor, or several other factors. Prevention of perineal lacerations requires that the operator identify the patient at risk. Possible options for management of high-risk patients include use of mediolateral episiotomy or no episiotomy, use of vacuum extraction instead of forceps, and use of conduction anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2375331     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90678-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Outcomes after vacuum-assisted deliveries. Births attended by community family practitioners.

Authors:  Colin Yarrow; Glenn Benoit; Michael C Klein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Can pelvic floor injury secondary to delivery be prevented?

Authors:  Yuval Lavy; Peter K Sand; Chava I Kaniel; Drorith Hochner-Celnikier
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Influence of training in the use and generation of evidence on episiotomy practice and perineal trauma.

Authors:  Jacqueline J Ho; Porjai Pattanittum; Robert P Japaraj; Tari Turner; Ussanee Swadpanich; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  E Gonzalez-Díaz; L Moreno Cea; A Fernández Corona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Risk and protective factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: A retrospective nationwide study.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Marschalek; Christof Worda; Lorenz Kuessel; Heinz Koelbl; Willi Oberaigner; Hermann Leitner; Julian Marschalek; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  French guidelines for restrictive episiotomy during instrumental delivery were not followed by an increase in obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Bertrand Gachon; Xavier Fritel; Olivier Rivière; Bruno Pereira; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.