BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is increasingly available for patients infected with subtype C HIV-1. This subtype is reported to develop the principal TDF resistance mutation in the HIV reverse transcriptase, K65R, with greater propensity than other subtypes. We sought to describe K65R development during TDF use in a cohort of patients infected with subtype C HIV. METHODS: Using a prospectively followed cohort with 6 monthly HIV RNA assays, we identified virological failure (defined as an HIV RNA > 1,000 copies/ml) during treatment that included TDF. Residual serum, stored at the time of the HIV RNA assay, was used for consensus sequencing and allele-specific PCR. We assessed prevalence of resistance at failure during TDF-containing treatment and associated factors. RESULTS: Among 1,682 patients on a TDF-containing regimen, 270 developed failure of which 40 were assessed for resistance. By sequencing, the K65R was identified in 5 (12%), major non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations in 24 (57%) and the M184V/I in 12 (28%) patients. The K65R was associated with lower HIV RNA at failure (HIV RNA 3.3 versus 4.2 log10 copies/ml) and prior stavudine exposure. An additional five patients had minority K65R populations identified by allele-specific PCR. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the K65R prevalence at virological failure is moderately higher in our subtype C population than some non-subtype C HIV cohorts. However, we did not find that the K65R was highly selected in HIV-1 subtype-C-infected patients with up to 6 months of failure of a TDF-containing regimen.
BACKGROUND:Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is increasingly available for patients infected with subtype C HIV-1. This subtype is reported to develop the principal TDF resistance mutation in the HIV reverse transcriptase, K65R, with greater propensity than other subtypes. We sought to describe K65R development during TDF use in a cohort of patients infected with subtype C HIV. METHODS: Using a prospectively followed cohort with 6 monthly HIV RNA assays, we identified virological failure (defined as an HIV RNA > 1,000 copies/ml) during treatment that included TDF. Residual serum, stored at the time of the HIV RNA assay, was used for consensus sequencing and allele-specific PCR. We assessed prevalence of resistance at failure during TDF-containing treatment and associated factors. RESULTS: Among 1,682 patients on a TDF-containing regimen, 270 developed failure of which 40 were assessed for resistance. By sequencing, the K65R was identified in 5 (12%), major non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations in 24 (57%) and the M184V/I in 12 (28%) patients. The K65R was associated with lower HIV RNA at failure (HIV RNA 3.3 versus 4.2 log10 copies/ml) and prior stavudine exposure. An additional five patients had minority K65R populations identified by allele-specific PCR. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the K65R prevalence at virological failure is moderately higher in our subtype C population than some non-subtype C HIV cohorts. However, we did not find that the K65R was highly selected in HIV-1 subtype-C-infectedpatients with up to 6 months of failure of a TDF-containing regimen.
Authors: Henry Sunpath; Baohua Wu; Michelle Gordon; Jane Hampton; Brent Johnson; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Claudia Ordonez; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Vincent C Marconi Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Bluma G Brenner; Maureen Oliveira; Florence Doualla-Bell; Daniela D Moisi; Michel Ntemgwa; Fernando Frankel; Max Essex; Mark A Wainberg Journal: AIDS Date: 2006-06-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: K Theys; J Vercauteren; J Snoeck; M Zazzi; R J Camacho; C Torti; E Schülter; B Clotet; A Sönnerborg; A De Luca; Z Grossman; D Struck; A-M Vandamme; A B Abecasis Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Joel E Gallant; Edwin DeJesus; José R Arribas; Anton L Pozniak; Brian Gazzard; Rafael E Campo; Biao Lu; Damian McColl; Steven Chuck; Jeffrey Enejosa; John J Toole; Andrew K Cheng Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nicolas A Margot; Erica Isaacson; Ian McGowan; Andrew K Cheng; Robert T Schooley; Michael D Miller Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-06-14 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: S Charalambous; A D Grant; J H Day; L Pemba; R E Chaisson; P Kruger; D Martin; R Wood; B Brink; G J Churchyard Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2007-01
Authors: Joel E Gallant; Schlomo Staszewski; Anton L Pozniak; Edwin DeJesus; Jamal M A H Suleiman; Michael D Miller; Dion F Coakley; Biao Lu; John J Toole; Andrew K Cheng Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-07-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Koen K A Van Rompay; Jeffrey A Johnson; Emily J Blackwood; Raman P Singh; Jonathan Lipscomb; Timothy B Matthews; Marta L Marthas; Niels C Pedersen; Norbert Bischofberger; Walid Heneine; Thomas W North Journal: Retrovirology Date: 2007-04-06 Impact factor: 4.602
Authors: Irene Ketseoglou; Azwidowi Lukhwareni; Kim Steegen; Sergio Carmona; Wendy S Stevens; Maria A Papathanasopoulos Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Gert U van Zyl; Lisa M Frenkel; Michael H Chung; Wolfgang Preiser; John W Mellors; Jean B Nachega Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Maria Casadellà; Marc Noguera-Julian; Henry Sunpath; Michelle Gordon; Cristina Rodriguez; Mariona Parera; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Vincent C Marconi; Roger Paredes Journal: AIDS Date: 2016-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Lindiwe Skhosana; Kim Steegen; Michelle Bronze; Azwidowi Lukhwareni; Esrom Letsoalo; Maria A Papathanasopoulos; Sergio C Carmona; Wendy S Stevens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240