OBJECTIVE: Study 903 was a 144-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Patients received either TDF (n = 299) or stavudine (d4T) (n = 301) with lamivudine (3TC) and efavirenz (EFV). Resistance analyses were performed at baseline and at virological failure to determine the effects of baseline resistance and the patterns of resistance at virological failure. METHODS: Plasma HIV-1 from patients at baseline and at virological failure (>400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 144 or early discontinuation) was analysed phenotypically and by population sequencing. RESULTS: Sixteen per cent of patients were classified as having virological failure (47 on TDF and 49 on d4T; P = 0.91). Patients with non-B HIV-1 subtypes or baseline nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-associated mutations responded similarly to the overall population. Resistance to EFV (K103N and others) or 3TC (M184V) developed most frequently (8.3% and 5.8%, respectively) and similarly in the two arms. In the d4T arm, a variety of NRTI mutations developed: K65R (n = 2), L74V (n = 2), V75M (n = 1), and T69A + Y115H (n = 1). K65R developed in eight TDF patients (2.7%); in seven of these eight patients, within 48 weeks. All eight patients began new regimens with a protease inhibitor (PI) and NRTIs, including two patients who remained on TDF; five of the eight patients achieved HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in second-line therapy with the remaining patients having no follow-up or being nonadherent. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of HIV-1 with TDF, 3TC and EFV was highly effective, with <3% of patients developing resistance to TDF over 144 weeks.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Study 903 was a 144-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infectedpatients. Patients received either TDF (n = 299) or stavudine (d4T) (n = 301) with lamivudine (3TC) and efavirenz (EFV). Resistance analyses were performed at baseline and at virological failure to determine the effects of baseline resistance and the patterns of resistance at virological failure. METHODS: Plasma HIV-1 from patients at baseline and at virological failure (>400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 144 or early discontinuation) was analysed phenotypically and by population sequencing. RESULTS: Sixteen per cent of patients were classified as having virological failure (47 on TDF and 49 on d4T; P = 0.91). Patients with non-B HIV-1 subtypes or baseline nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-associated mutations responded similarly to the overall population. Resistance to EFV (K103N and others) or 3TC (M184V) developed most frequently (8.3% and 5.8%, respectively) and similarly in the two arms. In the d4T arm, a variety of NRTI mutations developed: K65R (n = 2), L74V (n = 2), V75M (n = 1), and T69A + Y115H (n = 1). K65R developed in eight TDFpatients (2.7%); in seven of these eight patients, within 48 weeks. All eight patients began new regimens with a protease inhibitor (PI) and NRTIs, including two patients who remained on TDF; five of the eight patients achieved HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in second-line therapy with the remaining patients having no follow-up or being nonadherent. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of HIV-1 with TDF, 3TC and EFV was highly effective, with <3% of patients developing resistance to TDF over 144 weeks.
Authors: Henry Sunpath; Baohua Wu; Michelle Gordon; Jane Hampton; Brent Johnson; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Claudia Ordonez; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Vincent C Marconi Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: D Bradshaw; S Malik; C Booth; M Van Houtte; T Pattery; A Waters; J Ainsworth; A M Geretti Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-09-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Michele W Tang; Soo-Yon Rhee; Silvia Bertagnolio; Nathan Ford; Susan Holmes; Kim C Sigaloff; Raph L Hamers; Tobias F Rinke de Wit; Herve J Fleury; Phyllis J Kanki; Kiat Ruxrungtham; Claudia A Hawkins; Carole L Wallis; Wendy Stevens; Gert U van Zyl; Weerawat Manosuthi; Mina C Hosseinipour; Nicole Ngo-Giang-Huong; Laurent Belec; Martine Peeters; Avelin Aghokeng; Torsak Bunupuradah; Sherri Burda; Patricia Cane; Giulia Cappelli; Charlotte Charpentier; Anoumou Y Dagnra; Alaka K Deshpande; Ziad El-Katib; Susan H Eshleman; Joseph Fokam; Jean-Chrysostome Gody; David Katzenstein; Donato D Koyalta; Johnstone J Kumwenda; Marc Lallemant; Lutgarde Lynen; Vincent C Marconi; Nicolas A Margot; Sandrine Moussa; Thumbi Ndung'u; Phillipe N Nyambi; Catherine Orrell; Jonathan M Schapiro; Rob Schuurman; Sunee Sirivichayakul; Davey Smith; Maria Zolfo; Michael R Jordan; Robert W Shafer Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Viktor von Wyl; Valentina Cambiano; Michael R Jordan; Silvia Bertagnolio; Alec Miners; Deenan Pillay; Jens Lundgren; Andrew N Phillips Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kalyan Das; Rajiv P Bandwar; Kirsten L White; Joy Y Feng; Stefan G Sarafianos; Steven Tuske; Xiongying Tu; Arthur D Clark; Paul L Boyer; Xiaorong Hou; Barbara L Gaffney; Roger A Jones; Michael D Miller; Stephen H Hughes; Eddy Arnold Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2009-10-07 Impact factor: 5.157