Literature DB >> 23751332

Treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater: ozone or powdered activated carbon?

Jonas Margot1, Cornelia Kienle, Anoÿs Magnet, Mirco Weil, Luca Rossi, Luiz Felippe de Alencastro, Christian Abegglen, Denis Thonney, Nathalie Chèvre, Michael Schärer, D A Barry.   

Abstract

Many organic micropollutants present in wastewater, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides, are poorly removed in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). To reduce the release of these substances into the aquatic environment, advanced wastewater treatments are necessary. In this context, two large-scale pilot advanced treatments were tested in parallel over more than one year at the municipal WWTP of Lausanne, Switzerland. The treatments were: i) oxidation by ozone followed by sand filtration (SF) and ii) powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption followed by either ultrafiltration (UF) or sand filtration. More than 70 potentially problematic substances (pharmaceuticals, pesticides, endocrine disruptors, drug metabolites and other common chemicals) were regularly measured at different stages of treatment. Additionally, several ecotoxicological tests such as the Yeast Estrogen Screen, a combined algae bioassay and a fish early life stage test were performed to evaluate effluent toxicity. Both treatments significantly improved the effluent quality. Micropollutants were removed on average over 80% compared with raw wastewater, with an average ozone dose of 5.7 mg O3 l(-1) or a PAC dose between 10 and 20 mg l(-1). Depending on the chemical properties of the substances (presence of electron-rich moieties, charge and hydrophobicity), either ozone or PAC performed better. Both advanced treatments led to a clear reduction in toxicity of the effluents, with PAC-UF performing slightly better overall. As both treatments had, on average, relatively similar efficiency, further criteria relevant to their implementation were considered, including local constraints (e.g., safety, sludge disposal, disinfection), operational feasibility and cost. For sensitive receiving waters (drinking water resources or recreational waters), the PAC-UF treatment, despite its current higher cost, was considered to be the most suitable option, enabling good removal of most micropollutants and macropollutants without forming problematic by-products, the strongest decrease in toxicity and a total disinfection of the effluent.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Effluent toxicity; Organic micropollutant; Ozone; Pharmaceutical; Powdered activated carbon; Wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23751332     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  26 in total

1.  Proposal to optimize ecotoxicological evaluation of wastewater treated by conventional biological and ozonation processes.

Authors:  Adriana Wigh; Alain Devaux; Vanessa Brosselin; Adriana Gonzalez-Ospina; Bruno Domenjoud; Selim Aït-Aïssa; Nicolas Creusot; Antoine Gosset; Christine Bazin; Sylvie Bony
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of propranolol hydrochloride and losartan potassium to Lemna minor L. (1753) individually and in binary mixtures.

Authors:  Aline A Godoy; Fábio Kummrow; Paulo Augusto Z Pamplin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Fish embryo tests with Danio rerio as a tool to evaluate surface water and sediment quality in rivers influenced by wastewater treatment plants using different treatment technologies.

Authors:  Paul Thellmann; Heinz-R Köhler; Annette Rößler; Marco Scheurer; Simon Schwarz; Hans-Joachim Vogel; Rita Triebskorn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Chris J Salice; Bjorn Birnir; Randy J F Bruins; Peter Calow; Virginie Ducrot; Nika Galic; Kristina Garber; Bret C Harvey; Henriette Jager; Andrew Kanarek; Robert Pastorok; Steve F Railsback; Richard Rebarber; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Thermodynamic study of seven micropollutants adsorption onto an activated carbon cloth: Van't Hoff method, calorimetry, and COSMO-RS simulations.

Authors:  Sylvain Masson; Cyril Vaulot; Laurence Reinert; Sylvie Guittonneau; Roger Gadiou; Laurent Duclaux
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Behavior of sartans (antihypertensive drugs) in wastewater treatment plants, their occurrence and risk for the aquatic environment.

Authors:  Anne Bayer; Robert Asner; Walter Schüssler; Willi Kopf; Klaus Weiß; Manfred Sengl; Marion Letzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity reduction of the polluted urban river after ecological restoration: a field-scale study of Jialu River in northern China.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Rui Zhang; Long Qin; Haixiao Zhu; Yu Huang; Yingang Xue; Shuqing An; Xianchuan Xie; Aimin Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Pesticides in the typical agricultural groundwater in Songnen plain, northeast China: occurrence, spatial distribution and health risks.

Authors:  Fuyang Huang; Zeyan Li; Chong Zhang; Théogène Habumugisha; Fei Liu; Ximing Luo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 4.609

9.  Combining in vitro reporter gene bioassays with chemical analysis to assess changes in the water quality along the Ammer River, Southwestern Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian E Müller; Beate I Escher; Marc Schwientek; Martina Werneburg; Christiane Zarfl; Christian Zwiener
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.893

10.  Carbamazepine and Diclofenac Removal Double Treatment: Oxidation and Adsorption.

Authors:  Alejandro Aldeguer Esquerdo; Pedro José Varo Galvañ; Irene Sentana Gadea; Daniel Prats Rico
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.