Literature DB >> 23751154

Neurophysiological evidence of differential mechanisms involved in producing opposing and following responses to altered auditory feedback.

Weifeng Li1, Zhaocong Chen, Peng Liu, Baofeng Zhang, Dongfeng Huang, Hanjun Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: When hearing perturbations in voice auditory feedback, people produce responses that mostly oppose the perturbation direction, whereas a few responses follow the direction of feedback perturbation. The causes of opposing and following responses, however, remain poorly understood. The present event-related potential (ERP) study sought to examine the neurophysiological processing of opposing and following responses to pitch feedback perturbations during self-monitoring of vocal production.
METHOD: Twelve Mandarin-native speakers participated in the experiment. Vocal and neurophysiological responses to pitch perturbations (± 50 and ± 200 cents) in voice auditory feedback were measured. Individual-trial responses were categorized according to the response direction and then separately averaged in groups of opposing and following responses. ERPs indexed by the P1-N1-P2 complex corresponding to two types of vocal responses were also obtained.
RESULTS: Opposing and following vocal responses did not differ in the magnitude, but there were greater proportions of opposing to following responses to 50 cents stimuli. The amplitude and latency of the P1 and N1 components showed none of significance across conditions, whereas there was a direction × magnitude effect on the P2 response. Following responses elicited greater P2 amplitudes than opposing responses only when pitch feedback was perturbed for downward 200 cents, and upward pitch perturbation elicited greater P2 amplitudes than those with downward direction only in the production of opposing responses.
CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that cortical processing of opposing responses is different from that of following responses, which can be modulated by the physical properties of feedback perturbation. SIGNIFICANCE: Different neural mechanisms are involved in the production of opposing and following responses to feedback perturbations during self-monitoring of vocal production.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory feedback; Event-related potential; Following response; Opposing response; Voice control

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23751154     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  9 in total

1.  The impact of parkinson's disease on the cortical mechanisms that support auditory-motor integration for voice control.

Authors:  Xiyan Huang; Xi Chen; Nan Yan; Jeffery A Jones; Emily Q Wang; Ling Chen; Zhiqiang Guo; Weifeng Li; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Predicting auditory feedback control of speech production from subregional shape of subcortical structures.

Authors:  Xiaoying Tang; Na Chen; Siyun Zhang; Jeffery A Jones; Baofeng Zhang; Jingyuan Li; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Tiffany Voon; Monique Tardif; Dante Cilento; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Transfer Effect of Speech-sound Learning on Auditory-motor Processing of Perceived Vocal Pitch Errors.

Authors:  Zhaocong Chen; Francis C K Wong; Jeffery A Jones; Weifeng Li; Peng Liu; Xi Chen; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Attention modulates cortical processing of pitch feedback errors in voice control.

Authors:  Huijing Hu; Ying Liu; Zhiqiang Guo; Weifeng Li; Peng Liu; Shaozhen Chen; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Auditory-Motor Control of Vocal Production during Divided Attention: Behavioral and ERP Correlates.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Hao Fan; Jingting Li; Jeffery A Jones; Peng Liu; Baofeng Zhang; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Decreased Gray-Matter Volume in Insular Cortex as a Correlate of Singers' Enhanced Sensorimotor Control of Vocal Production.

Authors:  Wenda Wang; Lirao Wei; Na Chen; Jeffery A Jones; Gaolang Gong; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Training of Working Memory Impacts Neural Processing of Vocal Pitch Regulation.

Authors:  Weifeng Li; Zhiqiang Guo; Jeffery A Jones; Xiyan Huang; Xi Chen; Peng Liu; Shaozhen Chen; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Association Between Genetic Variation in FOXP2 and Sensorimotor Control of Speech Production.

Authors:  Siyun Zhang; Jiangli Zhao; Zhiqiang Guo; Jeffery A Jones; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.