INTRODUCTION: Community-engaged health research, an approach to research which includes the participation of communities, promotes the translation of research to address and improve social determinants of health. As a way to encourage community-engaged research, the National Institutes of Health required applicants to the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) to include a community engagement component. Although grant-funding may support an increase in community-engaged research, faculties also respond to the rewards and demands of university promotion and tenure standards. This paper measures faculty perception of how three institutions funded by a CTSA support community-engaged research in the promotion and tenure process. METHODS: At three institutions funded by a CTSA, tenure track and nontenure track faculty responded to a survey regarding perceptions of how promotion and tenure committees value community-engaged research. RESULTS: Faculty view support for community-engaged research with some reserve. Only 36% agree that community-engaged research is valued in the promotion and tenure process. DISCUSSION: Encouraging community-engaged scholarship requires changing the culture and values behind promotion and tenure decisions. Institutions will increase community-engaged research and more faculty will adopt its principles, when it is rewarded by promotion and tenure committees.
INTRODUCTION: Community-engaged health research, an approach to research which includes the participation of communities, promotes the translation of research to address and improve social determinants of health. As a way to encourage community-engaged research, the National Institutes of Health required applicants to the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) to include a community engagement component. Although grant-funding may support an increase in community-engaged research, faculties also respond to the rewards and demands of university promotion and tenure standards. This paper measures faculty perception of how three institutions funded by a CTSA support community-engaged research in the promotion and tenure process. METHODS: At three institutions funded by a CTSA, tenure track and nontenure track faculty responded to a survey regarding perceptions of how promotion and tenure committees value community-engaged research. RESULTS: Faculty view support for community-engaged research with some reserve. Only 36% agree that community-engaged research is valued in the promotion and tenure process. DISCUSSION: Encouraging community-engaged scholarship requires changing the culture and values behind promotion and tenure decisions. Institutions will increase community-engaged research and more faculty will adopt its principles, when it is rewarded by promotion and tenure committees.
Authors: C P Bonell; J Hargreaves; S Cousens; D Ross; R Hayes; M Petticrew; B R Kirkwood Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Harry P Selker; Brian L Strom; Daniel E Ford; David O Meltzer; Stephen G Pauker; Harold A Pincus; Eugene C Rich; Chris Tompkins; Evelyn P Whitlock Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Lauren S Bloodworth; Seena L Haines; Kevin R Kearney; Earlene E Lipowski; Todd D Sorensen; Dennis F Thompson; Yuen-Sum Vincent Lau Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Irene E Headen; Michal A Elovitz; Ashley N Battarbee; Jamie O Lo; Michelle P Debbink Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 10.693
Authors: Brenna B Maddox; Mary L Phan; Y Vivian Byeon; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Rebecca E Stewart; Byron J Powell; Kelsie H Okamura; Melanie Pellecchia; Emily M Becker-Haimes; David A Asch; Rinad S Beidas Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-07-16
Authors: Tisha M Felder; Kathryn L Braun; Heather M Brandt; Samira Khan; Sora Tanjasiri; Daniela B Friedman; Cheryl A Armstead; Kolawole S Okuyemi; James R Hébert Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2015
Authors: Bowen Chung; Keith Norris; Carol Mangione; Homero E Del Pino; Loretta Jones; Daniel Castro; Christina Wang; Douglas Bell; Sitaram Vangala; Katherine Kahn; Arleen F Brown Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Lupita D Montoya; Lorelay M Mendoza; Christine Prouty; Maya Trotz; Matthew E Verbyla Journal: Environ Eng Sci Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 1.907