Literature DB >> 11281095

Use of interreflection and shadow for surface contact.

C Madison1, W Thompson, D Kersten, P Shirley, B Smits.   

Abstract

The interaction of light with surfaces results in a number of lighting effects that may serve as valuable visual cues. Previous research on shadows has shown them to be effective in determining the three-dimensional (3-D) layout of a scene, but interreflections have been ignored as cues for spatial layout. Interreflections as well as shadows may help to disambiguate the 3-D layout of objects by providing information about an object's contact with a surface. We generated computer images of a box on an extended textured ground plane that was either in contact with the ground or was slightly above the ground. Images were rendered for four conditions: (1) no shadow + no interreflection, (2) shadow only, (3) interreflection only, and (4) shadow + interreflection. A photometrically incorrect condition was also included. The participants rated the degree of contact for each image on a scale, which was used to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and a measure of sensitivity. In the images with no shadows or interreflections, the participants performed at chance levels. Interreflections, shadows, and a combination of interreflections and shadows all resulted in high sensitivity for judging object contact. More important, information from shadows and interreflections can be combined, resulting in near-perfect judgment of surface contact. Interreflections and shadows can be effective cues for object contact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11281095     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Inaccurate representation of the ground surface beyond a texture boundary.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Perceived relative distance on the ground affected by the selection of depth information.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

3.  Changes in angular size and speed affect the judged height of objects moving over a ground surface.

Authors:  Junjun Zhang; Myron L Braunstein; George J Andersen
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The visible ground surface as a reference frame for scaling binocular depth of a target in midair.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Liu Zhou; Pan Shi; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The visual system's intrinsic bias and knowledge of size mediate perceived size and location in the dark.

Authors:  Liu Zhou; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Is the perception of 3D shape from shading based on assumed reflectance and illumination?

Authors:  James T Todd; Eric J L Egan; Flip Phillips
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-09-18

7.  Perspective Space as a Model for Distance and Size Perception.

Authors:  Casper J Erkelens
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-29

8.  Multiple Photographs of a Perspective Scene Reveal the Principles of Picture Perception.

Authors:  Casper J Erkelens
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-26

9.  Contours produced by internal specular interreflections provide visual information for the perception of glass materials.

Authors:  James T Todd; J Farley Norman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Ambiguity in high definition: Gaze determines physical interpretation of ambiguous rotation even in the absence of a visual context.

Authors:  David Souto; Lily Smith; Jennifer Sudkamp; Marina Bloj
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.