Literature DB >> 23750377

Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model.

D T Kenrick1, E K Sadalla, G Groth, M R Trost.   

Abstract

Individual differences are explicitly connected to social interaction in Darwin's notion of sexual selection. Traits that increase the probability of successful reproduction will tend to increase in frequency. This process operates partly through differential choice, by one sex, of certain traits in the other. According to the parental investment model, females frequently have more stringent criteria for the traits they will accept in a mate because they have a relatively larger investment in each offspring. Because human mating arrangements often involve a substantial commitment of resources by the male, it is necessary to invoke a distinction between the selectivity involved during casual mating opportunities and the selectivity exercised when choosing a long-term partner. Ninety-three undergraduate men and women rated their minimum criteria on 24 partner characteristics at four levels of commitment. In line with an unqualified parental investment model, females were more selective overall, particularly on status-linked variables. In line with a qualified parental investment model, males' trait preferences depended upon the anticipated investment in the relationship. Males had lower requirements for a sexual partner than did females, but were nearly as selective as females when considering requirements for a long-term partner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 23750377     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers        ISSN: 0022-3506


  37 in total

1.  Environmental tracking by females : Sexual lability.

Authors:  D Thiessen
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1994-06

2.  NO RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE AND FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS IN A LARGE, GENETICALLY INFORMATIVE SAMPLE.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Brendan P Zietsch; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; John K Hewitt; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.178

3.  Increased heritability for lower IQ levels?

Authors:  J M Bailey; W Revelle
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Ethnic and gender differences in sexuality: variations in sexual behavior between Asian and non-Asian university students.

Authors:  C M Meston; P D Trapnell; B B Gorzalka
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1996-02

5.  An economic approach to the evolution of male-female exchange.

Authors:  William O Shropshire
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2003-09

6.  Sexually dimorphic mate preference in Japan : An analysis of lonely hearts advertisements.

Authors:  R Oda
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2001-09

7.  Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios.

Authors:  Gary L Brase; Gary Walker
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2004-06

8.  Mate choice in modern societies : Testing evolutionary hypotheses with behavioral data.

Authors:  D Pérusse
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1994-09

9.  Sexual selection and physical attractiveness : Implications for mating dynamics.

Authors:  S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

10.  Gender Interacts with Opioid Receptor Polymorphism A118G and Serotonin Receptor Polymorphism -1438 A/G on Speed-Dating Success.

Authors:  Karen Wu; Chuansheng Chen; Robert K Moyzis; Ellen Greenberger; Zhaoxia Yu
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.