Literature DB >> 23750098

Should we ask our Children about Sex, Drugs and Rock & Roll?: Potentially Harmful Effects of Asking Questions About Risky Behaviors.

Gavan J Fitzsimons1, Sarah G Moore.   

Abstract

Research shows that asking questions can fundamentally change behavior. We review literature on this question-behavior effect, which demonstrates that asking questions changes both normal and risky behaviors. We discuss potential explanations for the effect and review recent findings that reveal interesting moderators of the influence of questions on behavior. We then highlight the potential impact of the question-behavior effect in an important public health context: screening adolescents for risky behavior. While medical guidelines emphasize the importance of asking adolescents questions about substance (drug, alcohol) use and sexual behaviors, research on the question-behavior effect suggests that asking adolescents about risky behaviors has the potential to increase the frequency with which they engage in these behaviors. We argue that the act of screening or measuring risky behavior is potentially counterproductive. We emphasize the importance of interventions beyond screening, and suggest ways in which screening can be carried out to minimize its impact. In short, asking questions about behaviors can change behavior, and asking questions about risky behaviors may itself be a risky undertaking.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 23750098      PMCID: PMC3674563          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2008.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consum Psychol        ISSN: 1057-7408


  40 in total

1.  A model of dual attitudes.

Authors:  T D Wilson; S Lindsey; T Y Schooler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Naive probability: a mental model theory of extensional reasoning.

Authors:  P N Johnson-Laird; P Legrenzi; V Girotto; M S Legrenzi; J P Caverni
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  How serious are the adverse effects of screening?

Authors:  W Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Increasing condom-use intentions among sexually active black adolescent women.

Authors:  L S Jemmott; J B Jemmott
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Implementing the guidelines for adolescent preventive services.

Authors:  N J Montalto
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 3.292

6.  Human cognition in its social context.

Authors:  R S Wyer; T K Srull
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

Authors:  G A Marlatt; J S Baer; D R Kivlahan; L A Dimeff; M E Larimer; L A Quigley; J M Somers; E Williams
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-08

8.  Feasibility of screening adolescents for suicide risk in "real-world" high school settings.

Authors:  Denise Hallfors; Paul H Brodish; Shereen Khatapoush; Victoria Sanchez; Hyunsan Cho; Allan Steckler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  License to Sin: The Liberating Role of Reporting Expectations.

Authors:  Gavan J Fitzsimons; Joseph C Nunes; Patti Williams
Journal:  J Consum Res       Date:  2007-06

Review 10.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.

Authors:  T D Wilson; N Brekke
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  8 in total

1.  Being surveyed can change later behavior and related parameter estimates.

Authors:  Alix Peterson Zwane; Jonathan Zinman; Eric Van Dusen; William Pariente; Clair Null; Edward Miguel; Michael Kremer; Dean S Karlan; Richard Hornbeck; Xavier Giné; Esther Duflo; Florencia Devoto; Bruno Crepon; Abhijit Banerjee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Response of sensitive behaviors to frequent measurement.

Authors:  William G Axinn; Elyse A Jennings; Mick P Couper
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2014-07-22

3.  Do Assessments of HIV Risk Behaviors Change Behaviors and Prevention Intervention Efficacy? An Experimental Examination of the Influence of Type of Assessment and Risk Perceptions.

Authors:  Laura R Glasman; Donald Skinner; Laura M Bogart; Seth C Kalichman; Timothy McAuliffe; Cheryl A Sitzler; Yoesrie Toefy; Lance S Weinhardt
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-06

4.  Panel conditioning in longitudinal studies: evidence from labor force items in the Current Population Survey.

Authors:  Andrew Halpern-Manners; John Robert Warren
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-11

Review 5.  The Impact of Asking Intention or Self-Prediction Questions on Subsequent Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chantelle Wood; Mark Conner; Eleanor Miles; Tracy Sandberg; Natalie Taylor; Gaston Godin; Paschal Sheeran
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-07-10

6.  Testing the Question-Behavior Effect of Self-Administered Surveys Measuring Youth Drug Use.

Authors:  John S Briney; Eric C Brown; Margaret R Kuklinski; Sabrina Oesterle; J David Hawkins
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 7.  Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Kypros Kypri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Study protocol for PRISE: a longitudinal study of sexual harassment during the transition from childhood to adolescence.

Authors:  Therése Skoog; Kristina Holmqvist Gattario; Carolina Lunde
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2019-11-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.