Literature DB >> 23750073

Hydrogel based sensor arrays (2 × 2) with perforated piezoresistive diaphragms for metabolic monitoring (in vitro).

M P Orthner1, G Lin, M Avula, S Buetefisch, J Magda, L W Rieth, F Solzbacher.   

Abstract

This report details the first experimental results from novel hydrogel sensor array (2 × 2) which incorporates analyte diffusion pores into a piezoresistive diaphragm for the detection of hydrogel swelling pressures and hence chemical concentrations. The sensor assembly was comprised of three components, the active four sensors, HPMA/DMA/TEGDMA (hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA), N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMA) and crosslinker tetra-ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA)) hydrogel, and backing plate. Each of the individual sensors of the array can be used with various hydrogels used to measure the presence of a number of stimuli including pH, ionic strength, and glucose concentrations. Ideally, in the future, these sensors will be used for continuous metabolic monitoring applications and implanted subcutaneously. In this paper and to properly characterize the sensor assembly, hydrogels sensitive to changes ionic strength were synthesized using hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA), N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMA) and crosslinker tetra-ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and inserted into the sensor assembly. This hydrogel quickly and reversibly swells when placed environments of physiological buffer solutions (PBS) with ionic strengths ranging from 0.025 to 0.15 M, making it ideal for proof-of-concept testing and initial characterization. The assembly was wire bonded to a printed circuit board and coated with 3 ± 0.5 μm of Parylene-C using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) to protect the sensor and electrical connections during ionic strength wet testing. Two versions of sensors were fabricated for comparison, the first incorporated diffusion pores into the diaphragm, and the second used a solid diaphragm with perforated backing plate. This new design (perforated diaphragm) was shown to have slightly higher sensitivity than solid diaphragm sensors with separate diffuse backing plates when coupled with the hydrogel. The sensitivities for the 1 mm × 1 mm, 1.25 mm × 1.25 mm, 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm perforated diaphragm sensors were 53.3 ± 6.5, 171.7 ± 8.8, and 271.47 ± 27.53 mV/V-M, respectively. These results show that perforations in the diaphragm can be used not only to allow the diffusion of analyte into the cavity but to increase mechanical stress in the piezoresistive diaphragm, thereby increasing sensor output signal. The time constants for swellingswelling) and contracting (τcontracting) were calculated by fitting the sensor output half cycles to an exponential growth function. We found that the sensors' response was initially retarded during the preliminary hydrogel conditioning period then improved after 3-5 cycles with values of approximately 9 and 7 min for τswelling and τcontracting. For all sensors tested τswelling > τcontracting. This may be due to the increased loading on the hydrogel from the diaphragm during the swelling process. During contraction the diaphragm aids the hydrogel by reversibly applying mechanical pressure and therefore reducing τcontracting. Long term stability testing showed the sensors remained functional for upwards of 2 weeks in the test phosphate buffer solution (PBS).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Array; Chemical sensor; Hydrogel; Piezoresistive; Pressure sensor

Year:  2010        PMID: 23750073      PMCID: PMC3673776          DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.01.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem        ISSN: 0925-4005            Impact factor:   7.460


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomolecule-sensitive hydrogels.

Authors:  Takashi Miyata; Tadashi Uragami; Katsuhiko Nakamae
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Constant-volume hydrogel osmometer: a new device concept for miniature biosensors.

Authors:  In Suk Han; Man-Hee Han; Jinwon Kim; Seok Lew; Young Jun Lee; Ferenc Horkay; Jules J Magda
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 3.  Research and development in biosensors.

Authors:  F W Scheller; U Wollenberger; A Warsinke; F Lisdat
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Hydrogel-based piezoresistive pH sensors: investigations using FT-IR attenuated total reflection spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Joerg Sorber; Gerald Steiner; Volker Schulz; Margarita Guenther; Gerald Gerlach; Reiner Salzer; Karl-Friedrich Arndt
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  A miniaturized carbon dioxide gas sensor based on sensing of pH-sensitive hydrogel swelling with a pressure sensor.

Authors:  S Herber; J Bomer; W Olthuis; P Bergveld; A van den Berg
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.838

6.  Development, Fabrication, and Characterization of Hydrogel Based Piezoresistive Pressure Sensors with Perforated Diaphragms.

Authors:  M P Orthner; Sebastian Buetefisch; J Magda; L W Rieth; F Solzbacher
Journal:  Sens Actuators A Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.407

7.  Free swelling and confined smart hydrogels for applications in chemomechanical sensors for physiological monitoring.

Authors:  G Lin; S Chang; C-H Kuo; J Magda; F Solzbacher
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 7.460

8.  Assessment of a new prototype hydrogel CO( 2 ) sensor; comparison with air tonometry.

Authors:  Rinze W F ter Steege; Sebastiaan Herber; Wouter Olthuis; Piet Bergveld; Albert van den Berg; Jeroen J Kolkman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 1.977

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli sensitive polymers and self regulated drug delivery systems: a very partial review.

Authors:  Ronald A Siegel
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Mucoadhesive PLGA Nanospheres and Nanocapsules for Lactoferrin Controlled Ocular Delivery.

Authors:  Rubén Varela-Fernández; Xurxo García-Otero; Victoria Díaz-Tomé; Uxía Regueiro; Maite López-López; Miguel González-Barcia; María Isabel Lema; Francisco Javier Otero-Espinar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.525

3.  Remote Microwave and Field-Effect Sensing Techniques for Monitoring Hydrogel Sensor Response.

Authors:  Olutosin Charles Fawole; Subhashish Dolai; Hsuan-Yu Leu; Jules Magda; Massood Tabib-Azar
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.891

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.