Literature DB >> 23749437

Applying the knowledge to action framework to plan a strategy for implementing breast cancer screening guidelines: an interprofessional perspective.

Sarah Munce1, Monika Kastner, Heidi Cramm, Shalini Lal, Sarah-Maude Deschêne, Mohammad Auais, Dawn Stacey, Melissa Brouwers.   

Abstract

Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) interventions may be one solution to improving the uptake of clinical guidelines. IKT research initiatives are particularly relevant for breast cancer research and initiatives targeting the implementation of clinical guidelines and guideline implementation initiatives, where collaboration with an interdisciplinary team of practitioners, patients, caregivers, and policy makers is needed for producing optimum patient outcomes. The objective of this paper was to describe the process of developing an IKT strategy that could be used by guideline developers to improve the uptake of their new clinical practice guidelines on breast cancer screening. An interprofessional group of students as well as two faculty members met six times over three days at the KT Canada Summer Institute in 2011. The team used all of the phases of the action cycle in the Knowledge to Action Framework as an organizing framework. While the entire framework was used, the step involving assessing barriers to knowledge use was judged to be particularly relevant in anticipating implementation problems and being able to inform the specific KT interventions that would be appropriate to mitigate these challenges and to accomplish goals and outcomes. This activity also underscored the importance of group process and teamwork in IKT. We propose that an a priori assessment of barriers to knowledge use (i.e., level and corresponding barriers), along with the other phases of the Knowledge to Action Framework, is a strategic approach for KT strategy development, implementation, and evaluation planning and could be used in the future planning of KT strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23749437     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0490-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  16 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  S H Woolf; R Grol; A Hutchinson; M Eccles; J Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-20

Review 3.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas; G MacLennan; C Fraser; C R Ramsay; L Vale; P Whitty; M P Eccles; L Matowe; L Shirran; M Wensing; R Dijkstra; C Donaldson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Predictors of high quality clinical practice guidelines: examples in oncology.

Authors:  Beatrice Fervers; Jako S Burgers; Margaret C Haugh; Melissa Brouwers; George Browman; Francoise Cluzeau; Thierry Philip
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Jacqueline Tetroe
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 6.  Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making.

Authors:  Sharon E Straus; Jacqueline M Tetroe; Ian D Graham
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Better guidelines for better care: enhancing the implementability of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Monika Kastner; Elizabeth Estey; Onil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  An automated tool for detecting medication overuse based on the electronic health records.

Authors:  Hojjat Salmasian; Daniel E Freedberg; Julian A Abrams; Carol Friedman
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Evidence of suboptimal management of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and symptomatic atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Lauren C Brown; Jeffrey A Johnson; Sumit R Majumdar; Ross T Tsuyuki; Finlay A McAlister
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review.

Authors:  Anneke L Francke; Marieke C Smit; Anke J E de Veer; Patriek Mistiaen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  3 in total

1.  Obstetrical brachial plexus injury (OBPI): Canada's national clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Christopher J Coroneos; Sophocles H Voineskos; Marie K Christakis; Achilleas Thoma; James R Bain; Melissa C Brouwers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Implementing a function-based cognitive strategy intervention within inter-professional stroke rehabilitation teams: Changes in provider knowledge, self-efficacy and practice.

Authors:  Sara E McEwen; Michelle Donald; Katelyn Jutzi; Kay-Ann Allen; Lisa Avery; Deirdre R Dawson; Mary Egan; Katherine Dittmann; Anne Hunt; Jennifer Hutter; Sylvia Quant; Jorge Rios; Elizabeth Linkewich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Facilitating Guideline Implementation in Primary Health Care Practices.

Authors:  Sanne Peters; André Bussières; Bart Depreitere; Stijn Vanholle; Julie Cristens; Mieke Vermandere; Aliki Thomas
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.