Literature DB >> 23748570

The Two-Week Referral System for colorectal cancer--not fit for purpose.

Robert T Padwick1, Adeel A Bajwa, Annabel Shaw, Edmund Leung, James Francombe, Michael L Stellakis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The UK government target expects all suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to be seen within the Two-Week Referral (TWR) system made by general practitioners. These guidelines originally derived from only level 5 evidence. However, this has significant impact on the workload for colorectal surgeons. The aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of this colorectal service and whether the referral criteria are predictive of CRC.
METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients referred under the TWR guidance in 2010 was assessed. The first 573 TWRs were piloted for analysis. Clinical information from each patient was collected regarding TWR criteria and additional colorectal symptoms or risk factors. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine which symptoms independently correlated with CRC.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six CRCs were diagnosed via all methods of referral in 2010. There were 940 patients referred under the TWR guidelines in that year, when 50 CRC patients were identified. Amongst the 573 patients, 32 CRCs were diagnosed. Multiple regression analysis revealed tenesmus to be independently associated with CRC (p = 0.003, Pearson's r = 0.09185). None of the individual TWR criteria confidently predicted CRC.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that the current TWR guidelines cannot effectively predict CRC. There is an urgent need for an evidence-based approach to referral criteria for suspected CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23748570     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1730-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?

Authors:  R Jones; G Rubin; P Hungin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-30

Review 2.  Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system.

Authors:  S Rai; M J Kelly
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Cancer statistics, 2000.

Authors:  R T Greenlee; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Leung; J Grainger; N Bandla; L Wong
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?

Authors:  A James Eccersley; Elena M Wilson; Andreas Makris; J Richard Novell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  How has the 'two-week wait' rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  D P K Chohan; K Goodwin; S Wilkinson; R Miller; N R Hall
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Prediction of colorectal cancer by a patient consultation questionnaire and scoring system: a prospective study.

Authors:  S N Selvachandran; R J Hodder; M S Ballal; P Jones; D Cade
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The two week referral for colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  T W Barwick; S B Scott; N S Ambrose
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Debnath; N Dielehner; K A Gunning
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 10.  The effects of the Two-Week Rule on NHS colorectal cancer diagnostic services: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kymberley Thorne; Hayley A Hutchings; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  A large proportion of fecal immunochemical test-positive participants in colorectal cancer screening is symptomatic.

Authors:  Clasine M de Klerk; Manon van der Vlugt; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 4.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.